Intraoperative morphometric study of distal femur in Brazilian patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the treatment option for patients with severe osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee whose symptoms are refractory to conservative management. Unfortunately, the level of patient dissatisfaction is high, reaching up to 25%. The reasons for this dissatisfaction are multifactorial, but bone-implant mismatch significantly increases the chance of pain and functional limitation. Sex-specific prosthesis designs have been developed to overcome this issue, but their use is still controversial. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate possible sex differences in the shape of the distal femur in patients with osteoarthritis. Secondary objectives were to investigate interpersonal variability of the distal femur and to determine the number of femoral implant sizes required to meet shape variations.A cross-sectional observational study prospectively compared 294 knees of 293 patients with osteoarthritis according to sex (201 female/93 male). Six intraoperative measurements were performed on the distal femur (height and width of both lateral and medial condyles, total medial-lateral width of the femur, and intercondylar distance). Sex differences and interpersonal variability were analyzed by multiple linear regressions. Measurements were also correlated with patient height. An optimization analysis was used to estimate the number of femoral implant sizes required. There were significant sex differences in the distal femur, where men had higher values than women in all measurements. Great interpersonal variability was found. The height of the lateral condyle was correlated with patient height, but the correlation was not strong. Twenty-five femoral implant sizes were required to meet the shape variations in our sample.The shape of the distal femur in patients with osteoarthritis shows great interpersonal variability, with men showing significantly higher values than women. A total of 25 different implant sizes would be necessary to adequately meet the variations observed in our study population.