Motion Planning and Control of Autonomous Aggressive Vehicle Maneuvers

Aggressive vehicle maneuvers such as those performed by professional racing drivers achieve high agility motion at the edge of handling limits. These aggressive maneuvers can be used to design human-inspired active safety features for next-generation "accident-free" vehicles. We present a motion planning and control design for autonomous aggressive vehicle maneuvers. The motion planner takes advantages of the sparse stable trees and the enhanced rapidly exploring random tree (RRT*) algorithms. The use of the sparsity property helps to reduce the computational cost of the RRT* method by removing non-useful nodes in each iteration and therefore to rapidly converge to the optimal solution. The proposed motion control design allows the vehicle to operate outside the stability region to accomplish a safe, agile maneuver. A safety region is computed to augment the stability region and the motion control is built on a modified nonlinear model predictive control method. We implement the proposed planner and controller and demonstrate the autonomous aggressive maneuvers on a 1/7-scale racing vehicle platform. Comparison with human expert driver and other existing methods is also presented to demonstrate the performance and robustness. Note to Practitioners —Motion planning and control of human driver-inspired aggressive vehicle maneuvers is a challenging task because of high-agility, unstable fast vehicle motions. This paper is motivated by addressing this challenge in autonomous driving technologies. Instead of restricting vehicle motions within a stability region that is taken by existing methods, we augment the conservative stability region to a safety region with guaranteed performance. To improve the computational efficiency of sampling-based motion planners, we take advantage of sparsity and also integration of a nonlinear predictive control method to compute feasible vehicle motion in searching space. The stability of the vehicle motion controller and sub-optimality of the motion planner are analyzed and guaranteed. Using a scaled vehicle testbed, we validate and compare the proposed motion planning and control design with other existing methods and human expert driver. The experimental results demonstrate the superior performance than the other methods and comparable with human expert driving skills.