医学
危险系数
混淆
共病
内科学
队列
肿瘤科
癌症
卵巢癌
比例危险模型
查尔森共病指数
置信区间
作者
Yongmei Huang,J. Alejandro Rauh‐Hain,Thomas H. McCoy,June Y. Hou,Grace Clarke Hillyer,Jennifer S. Ferris,Dawn L. Hershman,Jason D. Wright,Alexander Melamed
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.03.016
摘要
Objective To develop and evaluate a multidimensional comorbidity index (MCI) that identifies ovarian cancer patients at risk of early mortality more accurately than the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) for use in health services research. Methods We utilized SEER-Medicare data to identify patients with stage IIIC and IV ovarian cancer, diagnosed in 2010–2015. We employed partial least squares regression, a supervised machine learning algorithm, to develop the MCI by extracting latent factors that optimally captured the variation in health insurance claims made in the year preceding cancer diagnosis, and 1-year mortality. We assessed the discrimination and calibration of the MCI for 1-year mortality and compared its performance to the commonly-used CCI. Finally, we evaluated the MCI's ability to reduce confounding in the association of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and all-cause mortality. Results We included 4723 patients in the development cohort and 933 in the validation cohort. The MCI demonstrated good discrimination for 1-year mortality (c-index: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.72–0.79), while the CCI had poor discrimination (c-index: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.56–0.63). Calibration plots showed better agreement between predicted and observed 1-year mortality risk for the MCI compared with CCI. When comparing all-cause mortality between NACT with primary cytoreductive surgery, NACT was associated with a higher hazard of death (HR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.04–1.23) after controlling for tumor characteristics, demographic factors, and the CCI. However, when controlling for the MCI instead of the CCI, there was no longer a significant difference (HR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.96–1.14). Conclusions The MCI outperformed the conventional CCI in predicting 1-year mortality, and reducing confounding due to differences in baseline health status in comparative effectiveness analysis of NACT versus primary surgery.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI