Occupational health risk assessment methods in China: A scoping review

斯科普斯 指南 风险评估 中国 基督教牧师 梅德林 医学 环境卫生 风险分析(工程) 计算机科学 政治学 计算机安全 病理 法学
作者
Lifang Zhou,Panqi Xue,Yixin Zhang,Fang Wei,Jiena Zhou,Shasha Wang,Yong Hu,Xiaoming Lou,Hua Zou
出处
期刊:Frontiers in Public Health [Frontiers Media SA]
卷期号:10 被引量:9
标识
DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2022.1035996
摘要

Background Over the decades, many assessment methods have been developed around the world and used for occupational health risk assessment (OHRA). This scoping review integrated the literature on methodological studies of OHRA in China and aimed to identifies the research hot-spots and methodological research perspectives on OHRA in China. Methods A scoping review of literature was undertaken to explore the research progress on OHRA methods in China. Focusing on OHRA methods, the authors systematically searched Chinese and English databases and relevant guideline websites from the date of establishment to June 30, 2022. Databases included Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, the China National Knowledge Internet, WanFang Database. Some other websites were also searched to obtain gray literature. The extracted information included the author, year, region of first author, the target industry, risk assessment model, study type, the main results and conclusions. Results Finally, 145 of 9,081 studies were included in this review. There were 108 applied studies, 30 comparative studies and 7 optimization studies on OHRA in China. The OHRA methods studied included: (1) qualitative methods such as Romanian model, Australian model, International Council on Mining and Metals model, and Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Essentials; (2) quantitative methods such as the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency inhalation risk assessment model, Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic, and Monte Carlo simulation; (3) semi-quantitative methods such as Singapore model, Fuzzy mathematical risk assessment model, Likelihood Exposure Consequence method and Occupational Hazard Risk Index assessment method; (4) comprehensive method (Chinese OHRA standard GBZ/T 298-2017). Each of the OHRA methods had its own strengths and limitations. In order to improve the applicability of OHRA methods, some of them have been optimized by researchers. Conclusions There is a wide range of OHRA methods studied in China, including applied, comparative, and optimization studies. Their applicability needs to be further tested through further application in different industries. Furthermore, quantitative comparative studies, optimization studies, and modeling studies are also needed.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
dd发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
Lumos完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
尊敬依珊完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
王孟玲完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
大海发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
crz完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
TheDing完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
qiuqiu发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
温婉的豪完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
荔枝完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
CodeCraft应助大胆的向松采纳,获得10
4秒前
lynn完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
坚定的道天完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
赘婿应助郭嘉仪采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
6秒前
我要发sci发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
122啊发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
列昂尼多夫娜完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
wannada发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
zyw完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
7秒前
堇言发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
无奈曼云发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
沉默天宇完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
摸鱼真君发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
好好学习完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
隐形曼青应助紧张的幻柏采纳,获得10
9秒前
月落完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Modern Epidemiology, Fourth Edition 5000
Kinesiophobia : a new view of chronic pain behavior 5000
Molecular Biology of Cancer: Mechanisms, Targets, and Therapeutics 3000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Propeller Design 2000
Weaponeering, Fourth Edition – Two Volume SET 2000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 纳米技术 化学工程 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 冶金 细胞生物学 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6013693
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7584806
关于积分的说明 16142587
捐赠科研通 5161165
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2763532
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1743689
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1634421