Pegcetacoplan versus eculizumab in patients with paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria (PEGASUS): 48-week follow-up of a randomised, open-label, phase 3, active-comparator, controlled trial

伊库利珠单抗 医学 内科学 临床终点 养生 随机对照试验 打开标签 临床试验 抗体 免疫学 补体系统
作者
Régis Peffault de Latour,Jeff Szer,Ilene C. Weitz,Alexander Röth,Britta Höchsmann,Jens Panse,Kensuke Usuki,Morag Griffin,Jean‐Jacques Kiladjian,Carlos M. de Castro,Hisakazu Nishimori,Temitayo Ajayi,Mohammed Al-Adhami,Pascal Deschatelets,Cedric Francois,F Grossi,Antonio M. Risitano,Peter Hillmen
出处
期刊:The Lancet Haematology [Elsevier]
卷期号:9 (9): e648-e659 被引量:53
标识
DOI:10.1016/s2352-3026(22)00210-1
摘要

Summary

Background

In the PEGASUS trial, the complement C3 inhibitor, pegcetacoplan, showed superiority to eculizumab in improving haematological outcomes in adult patients with paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria and suboptimal response to eculizumab at 16 weeks. The aim of the open-label period was to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of pegcetacoplan through to 48 weeks.

Methods

PEGASUS was a phase 3, randomised, open-label, active-comparator controlled trial conducted in 44 centres in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Japan, Russia, South Korea, Spain, the UK, and the USA. Eligible participants were aged 18 years or older, had paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria, and had a haemoglobin concentration of less than 10·50 g/dL after 3 months or longer of stable eculizumab treatment. After a 4-week run-in with eculizumab plus pegcetacoplan, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by interactive response technology to pegcetacoplan (1080 mg subcutaneously twice weekly) or eculizumab (according to their regimen at enrolment) for 16 weeks and could continue to the open-label period (32 weeks of pegcetacoplan monotherapy [pegcetacoplan-to-pegcetacoplan] or 28 weeks of pegcetacoplan monotherapy [eculizumab-to-pegcetacoplan]). Randomisation was stratified by platelet count and number of previous blood transfusions. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in haemoglobin at week 16, which has previously been reported. The outcomes of the open-label period (week 16 to week 48) are reported here. At 48 weeks, efficacy (including mean haemoglobin concentration and quality of life measured on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy [FACIT]-Fatigue scale) was assessed in the intention-to-treat population and safety was assessed per protocol. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03500549, and has been completed.

Findings

Between June 14, 2018, and Nov 14, 2019, 80 patients were randomly assigned to receive treatment with pegcetacoplan (41 patients) or eculizumab (39 patients). Most participants were women (49 [61%]) and 31 (39%) were men; 12 (15%) were Asian, two (3%) were Black, 49 (61%) were White, and 17 (21%) were another race or did not report their race. The open-label period had 77 participants (38 pegcetacoplan-to-pegcetacoplan, 39 eculizumab-to-pegcetacoplan). Patients in the pegcetacoplan-to-pegcetacoplan group maintained high mean haemoglobin concentrations between 16 weeks (11·54 g/dL [SD 1·96]) and 48 weeks (11·30 g/dL [1·77]; p=0·14). Patients in the eculizumab-to-pegcetacoplan group had significantly greater mean haemoglobin concentrations at 48 weeks (11·57 g/dL [2·21]) versus 16 weeks (8·58 g/dL [0·96]; p<0·0001). Clinically meaningful improvements in FACIT-Fatigue scores were observed at 48 weeks, with a mean change from baseline for all patients receiving pegcetacoplan monotherapy of 9·89 points (SD 9·63), for patients in the pegcetacoplan-to-pegcetacoplan group mean 10·14 points (9·06), and for patients in the eculizumab-to-pegcetacoplan group mean 9·62 points (10·34). During the entire study period, 13 (16%) of 80 patients discontinued treatment (three [7%] of 41 through to week 16 due to breakthrough haemolysis, and ten [13%] of 77 due to severe treatment-emergent adverse events) and 18 patients (eight pegcetacoplan-to-pegcetacoplan, ten eculizumab-to-pegcetacoplan) had at least one serious treatment-emergent adverse event during the open-label period, four were considered to be related to pegcetacoplan treatment. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (in ≥10% patients) among both pegcetacoplan-treated groups during the open-label period were injection site reactions (in 20 [26%] of 77 patients), haemolysis (15 [19%]), nasopharyngitis (12 [16%]), and diarrhoea (ten [13%]). No treatment-related deaths occurred throughout the duration of the study.

Interpretation

The durability of improved haematological outcomes and favourable safety profile over 48 weeks of treatment suggests that pegcetacoplan has the potential to improve treatment benefit and alter treatment goals in patients with paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria.

Funding

Apellis Pharmaceuticals.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
1秒前
木木酱完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
晓凡完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
科研通AI6.3应助yingji采纳,获得30
3秒前
4秒前
5秒前
科研通AI6.2应助饶天源采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
杨玉轩完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
背后竺发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
虚心向上完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
WHW完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
xu完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
肖肖肖完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
9秒前
ZOE应助leah采纳,获得80
9秒前
9秒前
ST发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
cmy发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
珍珠火龙果完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
chelly发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
allen发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
Aurora发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
一见你就笑完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
田様应助潮哈哈耶采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
jelly完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
Matt发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
书雪发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
小纪发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
偷得浮生半日闲完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
yinghan完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
xx关闭了xx文献求助
16秒前
完美世界应助haibao采纳,获得10
16秒前
兴奋孤丝发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
小木虫完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Modern Epidemiology, Fourth Edition 5000
Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, Ninth edition 5000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Weaponeering, Fourth Edition – Two Volume SET 2000
Polymorphism and polytypism in crystals 1000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 生物化学 化学工程 物理 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 冶金 基因 遗传学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6022788
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7644468
关于积分的说明 16170630
捐赠科研通 5171139
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2766992
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1750381
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1636980