Pegcetacoplan versus eculizumab in patients with paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria (PEGASUS): 48-week follow-up of a randomised, open-label, phase 3, active-comparator, controlled trial

伊库利珠单抗 医学 内科学 临床终点 养生 随机对照试验 打开标签 临床试验 抗体 免疫学 补体系统
作者
Régis Peffault de Latour,Jeff Szer,Ilene C. Weitz,Alexander Röth,Britta Höchsmann,Jens Panse,Kensuke Usuki,Morag Griffin,Jean‐Jacques Kiladjian,Carlos M. de Castro,Hisakazu Nishimori,Temitayo Ajayi,Mohammed Al-Adhami,Pascal Deschatelets,Cedric Francois,F Grossi,Antonio M. Risitano,Peter Hillmen
出处
期刊:The Lancet Haematology [Elsevier]
卷期号:9 (9): e648-e659 被引量:32
标识
DOI:10.1016/s2352-3026(22)00210-1
摘要

Summary

Background

In the PEGASUS trial, the complement C3 inhibitor, pegcetacoplan, showed superiority to eculizumab in improving haematological outcomes in adult patients with paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria and suboptimal response to eculizumab at 16 weeks. The aim of the open-label period was to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of pegcetacoplan through to 48 weeks.

Methods

PEGASUS was a phase 3, randomised, open-label, active-comparator controlled trial conducted in 44 centres in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Japan, Russia, South Korea, Spain, the UK, and the USA. Eligible participants were aged 18 years or older, had paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria, and had a haemoglobin concentration of less than 10·50 g/dL after 3 months or longer of stable eculizumab treatment. After a 4-week run-in with eculizumab plus pegcetacoplan, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by interactive response technology to pegcetacoplan (1080 mg subcutaneously twice weekly) or eculizumab (according to their regimen at enrolment) for 16 weeks and could continue to the open-label period (32 weeks of pegcetacoplan monotherapy [pegcetacoplan-to-pegcetacoplan] or 28 weeks of pegcetacoplan monotherapy [eculizumab-to-pegcetacoplan]). Randomisation was stratified by platelet count and number of previous blood transfusions. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in haemoglobin at week 16, which has previously been reported. The outcomes of the open-label period (week 16 to week 48) are reported here. At 48 weeks, efficacy (including mean haemoglobin concentration and quality of life measured on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy [FACIT]-Fatigue scale) was assessed in the intention-to-treat population and safety was assessed per protocol. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03500549, and has been completed.

Findings

Between June 14, 2018, and Nov 14, 2019, 80 patients were randomly assigned to receive treatment with pegcetacoplan (41 patients) or eculizumab (39 patients). Most participants were women (49 [61%]) and 31 (39%) were men; 12 (15%) were Asian, two (3%) were Black, 49 (61%) were White, and 17 (21%) were another race or did not report their race. The open-label period had 77 participants (38 pegcetacoplan-to-pegcetacoplan, 39 eculizumab-to-pegcetacoplan). Patients in the pegcetacoplan-to-pegcetacoplan group maintained high mean haemoglobin concentrations between 16 weeks (11·54 g/dL [SD 1·96]) and 48 weeks (11·30 g/dL [1·77]; p=0·14). Patients in the eculizumab-to-pegcetacoplan group had significantly greater mean haemoglobin concentrations at 48 weeks (11·57 g/dL [2·21]) versus 16 weeks (8·58 g/dL [0·96]; p<0·0001). Clinically meaningful improvements in FACIT-Fatigue scores were observed at 48 weeks, with a mean change from baseline for all patients receiving pegcetacoplan monotherapy of 9·89 points (SD 9·63), for patients in the pegcetacoplan-to-pegcetacoplan group mean 10·14 points (9·06), and for patients in the eculizumab-to-pegcetacoplan group mean 9·62 points (10·34). During the entire study period, 13 (16%) of 80 patients discontinued treatment (three [7%] of 41 through to week 16 due to breakthrough haemolysis, and ten [13%] of 77 due to severe treatment-emergent adverse events) and 18 patients (eight pegcetacoplan-to-pegcetacoplan, ten eculizumab-to-pegcetacoplan) had at least one serious treatment-emergent adverse event during the open-label period, four were considered to be related to pegcetacoplan treatment. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (in ≥10% patients) among both pegcetacoplan-treated groups during the open-label period were injection site reactions (in 20 [26%] of 77 patients), haemolysis (15 [19%]), nasopharyngitis (12 [16%]), and diarrhoea (ten [13%]). No treatment-related deaths occurred throughout the duration of the study.

Interpretation

The durability of improved haematological outcomes and favourable safety profile over 48 weeks of treatment suggests that pegcetacoplan has the potential to improve treatment benefit and alter treatment goals in patients with paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria.

Funding

Apellis Pharmaceuticals.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
凌云客发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
kiterunner发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
迷你的怀莲完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
赘婿应助谦让月饼采纳,获得10
3秒前
YUE给YUE的求助进行了留言
3秒前
3秒前
小西贝发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
5秒前
6秒前
Echodeng完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
杨坤发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
wtc发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
Lx发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
13秒前
情怀应助xushanqi采纳,获得10
15秒前
科研通AI2S应助Chen采纳,获得30
16秒前
16秒前
18秒前
无响应完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
起点完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
君莫笑完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
充电宝应助王景采纳,获得10
23秒前
科目三应助坚强的茗茗采纳,获得10
23秒前
轻松刚发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
淡然立轩完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
儒雅谷云完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
bkagyin应助orange9采纳,获得10
24秒前
无花果应助野原向日葵采纳,获得10
24秒前
我是老大应助科科科研采纳,获得10
25秒前
26秒前
27秒前
29秒前
Orange应助z00277采纳,获得10
30秒前
思源应助虚幻羊采纳,获得10
30秒前
椰树椰汁完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
从容芮应助柯ke采纳,获得10
30秒前
高分求助中
Sustainability in Tides Chemistry 2000
Bayesian Models of Cognition:Reverse Engineering the Mind 888
Essentials of thematic analysis 700
A Dissection Guide & Atlas to the Rabbit 600
Very-high-order BVD Schemes Using β-variable THINC Method 568
Mantiden: Faszinierende Lauerjäger Faszinierende Lauerjäger 500
PraxisRatgeber: Mantiden: Faszinierende Lauerjäger 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3125620
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2775921
关于积分的说明 7728309
捐赠科研通 2431379
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1291979
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 622295
版权声明 600376