背景(考古学)
风险分析(工程)
药物开发
最佳实践
现代化理论
计算机科学
监管科学
业务
过程管理
医学
工程伦理学
工程类
药品
药理学
政治学
法学
古生物学
病理
生物
作者
Sarah A. Carratt,Christina L Zuch de Zafra,Elias M. Oziolor,Payal Rana,Nichole R. Vansell,Raja S. Mangipudy,Vishal S. Vaidya
标识
DOI:10.1093/toxsci/kfae122
摘要
Abstract Pharmaceutical developers are encouraged to adopt the best practices of being purposefully thoughtful about the use of animals, seeking alternatives wherever possible. They should engage with health authorities to increase their familiarity with the methods, study designs, data outputs and the context of use for new approach methodologies (NAMs). Although current state of technology does not yet provide adequate models to fully replace in vivo studies, many models are sufficiently good for an augmented approach that will enhance our understanding of in vitro to in vivo correlations and advance the long-term goal of reducing animal use through innovative NAMs. The goal of future nonclinical safety packages is to advance the utilization of such enabling technologies towards appropriate human risk characterization. Establishing confidence in NAMs is a critical first step. For example, sponsors may include both “traditional” and NAM-based nonclinical safety data in regulatory submissions to establish confidence with health authorities. In addition, regulators should create a “safe-harbor” for hybrid nonclinical data packages to facilitate iterative learning, refinement, and implementation of NAM-based safety assessment strategies. Sponsors are urged to contribute to NAMs evolution through consortia participation, peer-reviewed publications, and documenting animal reduction in studies/programs, accelerating the eventual elimination of animal use in pharmaceutical development, as envisioned in the FDA Modernization Act 3.0.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI