Systematic review with network meta‐analysis: first‐ and second‐line pharmacotherapy for moderate‐severe ulcerative colitis

医学 维多利祖马布 英夫利昔单抗 托法替尼 溃疡性结肠炎 内科学 安慰剂 不利影响 随机对照试验 优势比 阿达木单抗 外科 病理 肿瘤坏死因子α 疾病 替代医学 类风湿性关节炎
作者
Siddharth Singh,Mathurin Fuméry,William J. Sandborn,M. Hassan Murad
出处
期刊:Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics [Wiley]
卷期号:47 (2): 162-175 被引量:184
标识
DOI:10.1111/apt.14422
摘要

Summary Background There are limited data to inform positioning of agents for treating moderate‐severe ulcerative colitis ( UC ). Aim To assess comparative efficacy and safety of different therapies as first‐line (biologic‐naïve) and second‐line (prior exposure to anti‐tumour necrosis factor( TNF )‐α) agents for moderate‐severe UC , through a systematic review and network meta‐analysis, and appraise quality of evidence (QoE) using grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluation ( GRADE ) approach. Methods We identified randomised controlled trials ( RCT s) in adults with moderate‐severe UC treated with anti‐ TNF agents, anti‐integrin agents and janus kinase ( JAK ) inhibitors, as first‐line or second‐line agents, and compared with placebo or another active agent. Efficacy outcomes were induction/maintenance of remission and mucosal healing; and safety outcomes were serious adverse events and infections. Network meta‐analyses were performed, and ranking was assessed using surface under the cumulative ranking ( SUCRA ) probabilities. Results In biologic‐naïve patients (12 trials, no head‐to‐head comparisons), infliximab and vedolizumab were ranked highest for induction of clinical remission (infliximab: odds ratio [ OR ], 4.10 [95% confidence intervals [ CI ], 2.58‐6.52]; SUCRA ,0.85; vedolizumab: SUCRA ,0.82) and mucosal healing (infliximab: SUCRA ,0.91; vedolizumab: SUCRA ,0.81) (moderate QoE). In patients with prior anti‐ TNF exposure (4 trials, no head‐to‐head comparisons), tofacitinib was ranked highest for induction of clinical remission ( OR , 11.88 [2.32‐60.89]; SUCRA , 0.96) and mucosal healing (moderate QoE). Differences in trial design limited comparability of trials of maintenance therapy for efficacy. Vedolizumab was ranked safest in terms of serious adverse events ( SUCRA , 0.91), and infection ( SUCRA , 0.75) in maintenance trials. Conclusions Infliximab and vedolizumab are ranked highest as first‐line agents, and tofacitinib is ranked highest as second‐line agent, for induction of remission and mucosal healing in patients with moderate‐severe UC , based on indirect comparisons. Head‐to‐head trials are warranted to inform clinical decision‐making with greater confidence.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
wtdd发布了新的文献求助20
1秒前
舞拽拽完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
小吴同学发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
zho发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
accept发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
天真夏山发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
魁梧的海秋完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
Lucas应助可言采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
香蕉觅云应助djbj2022采纳,获得10
8秒前
科研通AI5应助dodo采纳,获得10
9秒前
搜集达人应助hu采纳,获得10
10秒前
香蕉觅云应助sad采纳,获得10
10秒前
11秒前
奶姜发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
三时寒发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
陈陈快点去读书完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
乐乐应助淳于无施采纳,获得100
12秒前
Clark发布了新的文献求助30
12秒前
隐形曼青应助Carlos采纳,获得10
14秒前
14秒前
小蘑菇应助wtdd采纳,获得10
14秒前
annnnn完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
乐乐应助天真夏山采纳,获得10
15秒前
陈道哥发布了新的文献求助20
15秒前
无畏阿玲发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
18秒前
清泽有鱼发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
wanci应助annnnn采纳,获得10
19秒前
烟花应助安静的龙猫采纳,获得10
19秒前
SHzheng完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
高分求助中
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 3000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Mechanistic Modeling of Gas-Liquid Two-Phase Flow in Pipes 2500
Comprehensive Computational Chemistry 1000
Conference Record, IAS Annual Meeting 1977 610
Interest Rate Modeling. Volume 3: Products and Risk Management 600
Interest Rate Modeling. Volume 2: Term Structure Models 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 量子力学 光电子学 冶金
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3553933
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3129728
关于积分的说明 9384042
捐赠科研通 2828848
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1555246
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 725940
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 715331