医学
药物警戒
相伴的
入射(几何)
混淆
内科学
人口
药理学
肿瘤科
不利影响
环境卫生
光学
物理
作者
Benjamin D Clarke,Mark Yates,Maryam Adas,Katie Bechman,James Galloway
出处
期刊:Rheumatology
[Oxford University Press]
日期:2021-01-04
卷期号:60 (Supplement_2): ii24-ii30
被引量:81
标识
DOI:10.1093/rheumatology/keaa895
摘要
As efficacy and safety data emerge, differences between JAK inhibitor subclasses are appearing. JAK1 selective drugs, upadacitinib and filgotinib, have broadly come with the same overarching safety recommendations as other immunosuppressive drugs for RA: caution is needed regarding infection risk; monitoring for laboratory abnormalities, including lipids and muscle enzymes, is indicated. A distinguishing feature of JAK inhibitors is a risk for zoster reactivation. Numerically, overall rates of serious infection are similar among JAK inhibitor classes. There are currently no signals for diverticular perforation. VTE incidence rates were similar across comparator groups for the JAK1 selective agents. These observations are not yet conclusive evidence for different safety profiles between JAK1 selective agents and other JAK inhibitors. Differences in study population, design, and concomitant steroid use are examples of potential confounders. It is too early to draw conclusions on long-term outcomes such as malignancy and cardiovascular risk. Post-marketing pharmacovigilance studies will be essential.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI