摘要
HomeCirculation: Cardiovascular InterventionsVol. 15, No. 6Intravascular Imaging to Guide Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Will Be Mandatory Soon No AccessEditorialRequest AccessFull TextAboutView Full TextView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toNo AccessEditorialRequest AccessFull TextIntravascular Imaging to Guide Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Will Be Mandatory Soon Akiko Maehara, MD Akiko MaeharaAkiko Maehara Correspondence to: Akiko Maehara, MD, Columbia University Medical Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, 1700 Broadway, New York, NY 10019. Email E-mail Address: [email protected] https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1910-8447 Clinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, NY. Division of Cardiology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Irving Medical Center. Search for more papers by this author Originally published11 May 2022https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.122.012120Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2022;15This article is a commentary on the followingPercutaneous Coronary Intervention With and Without Intravascular Ultrasound for Patients With Complex Lesions: Utilization, Mortality, and Target Vessel Revascularization"Intravascular Imaging to Guide Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Will Be Mandatory Soon." Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, 15(6), pp. e012120–FootnotesThe opinions expressed in this article are not necessarily those of the editors or of the American Heart Association.For Disclosures, see page 493.Correspondence to: Akiko Maehara, MD, Columbia University Medical Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, 1700 Broadway, New York, NY 10019. Email [email protected]orgReferences1. Maehara A, Matsumura M, Ali ZA, Mintz GS, Stone GW. IVUS-guided versus OCT-guided coronary stent implantation: a critical appraisal.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017; 10:1487–1503. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.09.008CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar2. Ali Z, Landmesser U, Karimi Galougahi K, Maehara A, Matsumura M, Shlofmitz RA, Guagliumi G, Price MJ, Hill JM, Akasaka Tet al. Optical coherence tomography-guided coronary stent implantation compared to angiography: a multicentre randomised trial in PCI - design and rationale of ILUMIEN IV: OPTIMAL PCI.EuroIntervention. 2021; 16:1092–1099. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00501CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar3. Shlofmitz E, Torguson R, Mintz GS, Zhang C, Sharp A, Hodgson JM, Shah B, Kumar G, Singh J, Inderbitzen Bet al. The impact on revascularization outcomes of intravascular ultrasound-guided treatment of complex lesions and economic impact (improve) trial: study design and rationale.Am Heart J. 2020; 228:65–71. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.08.002CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar4. Choi KH, Song YB, Lee JM, Lee SY, Park TK, Yang JH, Choi JH, Choi SH, Gwon HC, Hahn JY. Impact of intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention on long-term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing complex procedures.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019; 12:607–620. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.01.227CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar5. De Maria GL, Testa L, de la Torre Hernandez JM, Terentes-Printzios D, Emfietzoglou M, Scarsini R, Bedogni F, Spitzer E, Banning A. A multi-center, international, randomized, 2-year, parallel-group study to assess the superiority of IVUS-guided PCI versus qualitative angio-guided PCI in unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease: Study protocol for OPTIMAL trial.PLoS One. 2022; 17:e0260770. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260770CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar6. Hannan EL, Zhong Y, Reddy P, Jacobs AK, Ling FSK, King SB, Berger PB, Venditti FJ, Walford G, Tamis-Holland J. Percutaneous coronary intervention with and without intravascular ultrasound for patients with complex lesions: utilization, mortality, and target vessel revascularization.Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022; 15:e011687. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.121.011687LinkGoogle Scholar7. Mentias A, Sarrazin MV, Saad M, Panaich S, Kapadia S, Horwitz PA, Girotra S. Long-term outcomes of coronary stenting with and without use of intravascular ultrasound.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020; 13:1880–1890. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.04.052CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar8. Kinnaird T, Johnson T, Anderson R, Gallagher S, Sirker A, Ludman P, de Belder M, Copt S, Oldroyd K, Banning Aet al. Intravascular imaging and 12-month mortality after unprotected left main stem PCI: an analysis from the british cardiovascular intervention society database.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020; 13:346–357. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.10.007CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar9. Kim Y, Bae S, Johnson TW, Son NH, Sim DS, Hong YJ, Kim SW, Cho DK, Kim JS, Kim BK, et al; KAMIR‐NIH (Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry‐National Institutes of Health) Investigators [Link]. Role of intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in optimizing outcomes in acute myocardial infarction.J Am Heart Assoc. 2022; 11:e023481. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.023481LinkGoogle Scholar10. di Mario C, Koskinas KC, Räber L. Clinical benefit of IVUS guidance for coronary stenting: the ultimate step toward definitive evidence?J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018; 72:3138–3141. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.029CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Previous Back to top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsRelated articlesPercutaneous Coronary Intervention With and Without Intravascular Ultrasound for Patients With Complex Lesions: Utilization, Mortality, and Target Vessel RevascularizationEdward L. Hannan, et al. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2022;15 June 2022Vol 15, Issue 6 Advertisement Article InformationMetrics © 2022 American Heart Association, Inc.https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.122.012120PMID: 35543140 Originally publishedMay 11, 2022 Keywordsoptical coherence tomographyultrasoundEditorialsdissectioncoronary angiographymyocardial infarctionpercutaneous coronary interventionPDF download Advertisement SubjectsImagingOptical Coherence Tomography (OCT)Ultrasound