灵活性(工程)
多样性(控制论)
集合(抽象数据类型)
感觉
心理学
选择集
平面图(考古学)
社会心理学
目标追求
计算机科学
经济
人工智能
管理
考古
计量经济学
历史
程序设计语言
作者
Sydney Scott,Elanor F. Williams
标识
DOI:10.1177/00222437221143755
摘要
Consumers regularly attempt to improve themselves. This research examines how consumers think about flexibility during goal pursuit, for themselves and others. Flexibility involves leaving details of a plan, such as when to go to the gym or what to eat, open or easy to change, whereas rigid plans determine those details in advance. Here, several studies across a variety of goals show that people usually choose rigid plans for others. However, people are more likely to opt for some flexibility in their own plans. This occurs because many people believe flexible plans are less effective, but also more appealing (or less unpleasant), than rigid ones. Choosing for oneself, versus for someone else, increases the degree to which one follows one's heart (i.e., relies on feelings and desires), which makes people more likely to choose the more appealing option, flexibility. Asking people to “follow their heads” instead (i.e., rely on logic and reason) causes people to choose similar (rigid) plans for themselves and others. Finally, the authors use this framework to increase preferences for rigid fitness plans in a field experiment. This research provides insight into the psychology of flexibility and how to nudge consumers to set themselves up for success.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI