Deprescribing Medications Among Older Adults From End of Hospitalization Through Postacute Care

折旧 医学 多药 干预(咨询) 随机对照试验 心理干预 药剂师 急诊医学 药店 重症监护医学 家庭医学 护理部 内科学
作者
Eduard E. Vasilevskis,Avantika Saraf Shah,Emily Hollingsworth,Matthew S. Shotwell,Sunil Kripalani,Amanda S. Mixon,Sandra F. Simmons
出处
期刊:JAMA Internal Medicine [American Medical Association]
卷期号:183 (3): 223-223 被引量:36
标识
DOI:10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.6545
摘要

Importance Deprescribing is a promising approach to addressing the burden of polypharmacy. Few studies have initiated comprehensive deprescribing in the hospital setting among older patients requiring ongoing care in a postacute care (PAC) facility. Objective To evaluate the efficacy of a patient-centered deprescribing intervention among hospitalized older adults transitioning or being discharged to a PAC facility. Design, Setting, and Participants This randomized clinical trial of the Shed-MEDS (Best Possible Medication History, Evaluate, Deprescribing Recommendations, and Synthesis) deprescribing intervention was conducted between March 2016 and October 2020. Patients who were admitted to an academic medical center and discharged to 1 of 22 PAC facilities affiliated with the medical center were recruited. Patients who were 50 years or older and had 5 or more prehospital medications were enrolled and randomized 1:1 to the intervention group or control group. Patients who were non–English speaking, were unhoused, were long-stay residents of nursing homes, or had less than 6 months of life expectancy were excluded. An intention-to-treat approach was used. Interventions The intervention group received the Shed-MEDS intervention, which consisted of a pharmacist- or nurse practitioner–led comprehensive medication review, patient or surrogate-approved deprescribing recommendations, and deprescribing actions that were initiated in the hospital and continued throughout the PAC facility stay. The control group received usual care at the hospital and PAC facility. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was the total medication count at hospital discharge and PAC facility discharge, with follow-up assessments during the 90-day period after PAC facility discharge. Secondary outcomes included the total number of potentially inappropriate medications at each time point, the Drug Burden Index, and adverse events. Results A total of 372 participants (mean [SD] age, 76.2 [10.7] years; 229 females [62%]) were randomized to the intervention or control groups. Of these participants, 284 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (142 in the intervention group and 142 in the control group). Overall, there was a statistically significant treatment effect, with patients in the intervention group taking a mean of 14% fewer medications at PAC facility discharge (mean ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.80-0.93; P < .001) and 15% fewer medications at the 90-day follow-up (mean ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.78-0.92; P < .001) compared with the control group. The intervention additionally reduced patient exposure to potentially inappropriate medications and Drug Burden Index. Adverse drug event rates were similar between the intervention and control groups (hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.52-1.30). Conclusions and Relevance Results of this trial showed that the Shed-MEDS patient-centered deprescribing intervention was safe and effective in reducing the total medication burden at PAC facility discharge and 90 days after discharge. Future studies are needed to examine the effect of this intervention on patient-reported and long-term clinical outcomes. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02979353

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
所所应助7U采纳,获得10
刚刚
刚刚
无花果应助潘杰采纳,获得10
刚刚
nekobeing发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
win完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
bkagyin应助yuxiao采纳,获得10
3秒前
玉七发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
科研通AI6应助77采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
我是老大应助凌雪采纳,获得10
4秒前
元秋发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
Gandiva发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
默问应助自觉从筠采纳,获得20
5秒前
6秒前
宸昶完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
sean完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
wzgkeyantong完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
慕青应助犹豫的君浩采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
方华完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
研友_89eBO8完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
syz完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
研友_LwlAgn完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
Harden发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
kd7发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
浮游应助张淼采纳,获得10
9秒前
wjx发布了新的文献求助50
11秒前
电池博士发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
阿飞发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
善学以致用应助温暖白容采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
Or1ll完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Encyclopedia of Reproduction Third Edition 3000
《药学类医疗服务价格项目立项指南(征求意见稿)》 1000
花の香りの秘密―遺伝子情報から機能性まで 800
1st Edition Sports Rehabilitation and Training Multidisciplinary Perspectives By Richard Moss, Adam Gledhill 600
nephSAP® Nephrology Self-Assessment Program - Hypertension The American Society of Nephrology 500
Digital and Social Media Marketing 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5625544
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4711411
关于积分的说明 14955483
捐赠科研通 4779507
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2553786
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1515698
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1475905