Exploring the Intersection of Artificial Intelligence and Neurosurgery: Let us be Cautious With ChatGPT

可读性 医学 段落 质量(理念) 网页 交叉口(航空) 点(几何) 资源(消歧) 情报检索 人工智能 万维网 计算机科学 数学 计算机网络 认识论 工程类 哲学 航空航天工程 程序设计语言 几何学
作者
Akash Mishra,Sabrina L. Begley,Adrian Chen,Moontahinaz Rob,Isabelle Pelcher,Max Ward,Michael Schulder
出处
期刊:Neurosurgery [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:93 (6): 1366-1373 被引量:12
标识
DOI:10.1227/neu.0000000000002598
摘要

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: ChatGPT is a novel natural language processing artificial intelligence (AI) module where users enter any question or command and receive a single text response within seconds. As AI becomes more accessible, patients may begin to use it as a resource for medical information and advice. This is the first study to assess the neurosurgical information that is provided by ChatGPT. METHODS: ChatGPT was accessed in January 2023, and prompts were created requesting treatment information for 40 common neurosurgical conditions. Quantitative characteristics were collected, and four independent reviewers evaluated the responses using the DISCERN tool. Prompts were compared against the American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS) “For Patients” webpages. RESULTS: ChatGPT returned text organized in paragraph and bullet-point lists. ChatGPT responses were shorter (mean 270.1 ± 41.9 words; AANS webpage 1634.5 ± 891.3 words) but more difficult to read (mean Flesch-Kincaid score 32.4 ± 6.7; AANS webpage 37.1 ± 7.0). ChatGPT output was found to be of “fair” quality (mean DISCERN score 44.2 ± 4.1) and significantly inferior to the “good” overall quality of the AANS patient website (57.7 ± 4.4). ChatGPT was poor in providing references/resources and describing treatment risks. ChatGPT provided 177 references, of which 68.9% were inaccurate and 33.9% were completely falsified. CONCLUSION: ChatGPT is an adaptive resource for neurosurgical information but has shortcomings that limit the quality of its responses, including poor readability, lack of references, and failure to fully describe treatment options. Hence, patients and providers should remain wary of the provided content. As ChatGPT or other AI search algorithms continue to improve, they may become a reliable alternative for medical information.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
咕咕咕完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
丁真先生完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
天天向上发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
风趣夜云完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
穆仰完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
温暖笑容完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
123完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
不爱干饭发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
yun完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
几时有发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
丘比特应助wangsikui采纳,获得10
17秒前
17秒前
222完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
19秒前
Lucas应助www采纳,获得10
19秒前
科研通AI2S应助温暖笑容采纳,获得10
19秒前
zzz发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
明理的幻悲完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
乐观发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
小妤丸子完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
易安发布了新的文献求助30
24秒前
26秒前
28秒前
你没放假完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
小象腿完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
29秒前
大梦完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
31秒前
莎莎薯条发布了新的文献求助10
32秒前
CodeCraft应助dd采纳,获得10
32秒前
星河鱼发布了新的文献求助30
33秒前
个性的紫菜应助几时有采纳,获得10
34秒前
丘比特应助乐观采纳,获得10
34秒前
叶sir发布了新的文献求助10
34秒前
领导范儿应助嗷卵犟采纳,获得30
35秒前
36秒前
谭显芝发布了新的文献求助10
36秒前
36秒前
高分求助中
The Oxford Handbook of Social Cognition (Second Edition, 2024) 1050
Kinetics of the Esterification Between 2-[(4-hydroxybutoxy)carbonyl] Benzoic Acid with 1,4-Butanediol: Tetrabutyl Orthotitanate as Catalyst 1000
The Young builders of New china : the visit of the delegation of the WFDY to the Chinese People's Republic 1000
юрские динозавры восточного забайкалья 800
English Wealden Fossils 700
Chen Hansheng: China’s Last Romantic Revolutionary 500
Mantiden: Faszinierende Lauerjäger Faszinierende Lauerjäger 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3140679
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2791473
关于积分的说明 7799108
捐赠科研通 2447844
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1302064
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 626434
版权声明 601194