亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整的填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Comparison of ChatGPT–3.5, ChatGPT-4, and Orthopaedic Resident Performance on Orthopaedic Assessment Examinations

医学 骨科手术 子群分析 口译(哲学) 医学物理学 外科 内科学 荟萃分析 语言学 哲学
作者
Patrick A. Massey,Carver Montgomery,Andrew S. Zhang
标识
DOI:10.5435/jaaos-d-23-00396
摘要

Introduction: Artificial intelligence (AI) programs have the ability to answer complex queries including medical profession examination questions. The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of orthopaedic residents (ortho residents) against Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT)-3.5 and GPT-4 on orthopaedic assessment examinations. A secondary objective was to perform a subgroup analysis comparing the performance of each group on questions that included image interpretation versus text-only questions. Methods: The ResStudy orthopaedic examination question bank was used as the primary source of questions. One hundred eighty questions and answer choices from nine different orthopaedic subspecialties were directly input into ChatGPT-3.5 and then GPT-4. ChatGPT did not have consistently available image interpretation, so no images were directly provided to either AI format. Answers were recorded as correct versus incorrect by the chatbot, and resident performance was recorded based on user data provided by ResStudy. Results: Overall, ChatGPT-3.5, GPT-4, and ortho residents scored 29.4%, 47.2%, and 74.2%, respectively. There was a difference among the three groups in testing success, with ortho residents scoring higher than ChatGPT-3.5 and GPT-4 ( P < 0.001 and P < 0.001). GPT-4 scored higher than ChatGPT-3.5 ( P = 0.002). A subgroup analysis was performed by dividing questions into question stems without images and question stems with images. ChatGPT-3.5 was more correct (37.8% vs. 22.4%, respectively, OR = 2.1, P = 0.033) and ChatGPT-4 was also more correct (61.0% vs. 35.7%, OR = 2.8, P < 0.001), when comparing text-only questions versus questions with images. Residents were 72.6% versus 75.5% correct with text-only questions versus questions with images, with no significant difference ( P = 0.302). Conclusion: Orthopaedic residents were able to answer more questions accurately than ChatGPT-3.5 and GPT-4 on orthopaedic assessment examinations. GPT-4 is superior to ChatGPT-3.5 for answering orthopaedic resident assessment examination questions. Both ChatGPT-3.5 and GPT-4 performed better on text-only questions than questions with images. It is unlikely that GPT-4 or ChatGPT-3.5 would pass the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery written examination.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
2秒前
小蘑菇应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
科目三应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
YangSihan发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
坦率耳机应助YangSihan采纳,获得20
21秒前
十七完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
搜集达人应助wjadejing采纳,获得10
36秒前
YangSihan完成签到,获得积分10
44秒前
44秒前
wjadejing发布了新的文献求助10
48秒前
wjadejing完成签到,获得积分20
54秒前
57秒前
59秒前
gy完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
852应助田柾国采纳,获得10
1分钟前
二十又澪完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
酷波er应助老白非采纳,获得10
1分钟前
科研通AI2S应助oleskarabach采纳,获得10
1分钟前
二十又澪发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
田柾国发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
千纸鹤完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
Ava应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2分钟前
2分钟前
笙璃完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
songsssssj完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
非洲大象发布了新的文献求助50
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
复杂问筠完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
老白非发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
背后寻真完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
上官若男应助明理的晓绿采纳,获得10
3分钟前
高分求助中
Evolution 10000
ISSN 2159-8274 EISSN 2159-8290 1000
Becoming: An Introduction to Jung's Concept of Individuation 600
Ore genesis in the Zambian Copperbelt with particular reference to the northern sector of the Chambishi basin 500
A new species of Coccus (Homoptera: Coccoidea) from Malawi 500
A new species of Velataspis (Hemiptera Coccoidea Diaspididae) from tea in Assam 500
PraxisRatgeber: Mantiden: Faszinierende Lauerjäger 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3162300
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2813328
关于积分的说明 7899645
捐赠科研通 2472759
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1316517
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 631365
版权声明 602142