A “Clear” Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Diagnosis on Ultrasound Examination Does Not Predict Improved Outcomes When Compared With a “Borderline” Diagnosis

腕管综合征 医学 正中神经 腕管 支持带 SSS公司* 超声波 体格检查 神经传导研究 手腕 外科 神经传导 物理疗法 放射科 内科学
作者
Robert C Vernick,John R. Fowler
出处
期刊:Hand [SAGE]
卷期号:19 (6): 912-916 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1177/15589447231154026
摘要

Background: Nerve conduction studies (NCS) and ultrasound (US) remain imperfect compared with clinical diagnosis and/or diagnostic tools such as carpal tunnel syndrome-6 (CTS-6) for diagnosis of carpal tunne syndrome (CTS). One potential reason for the discrepancy between clinical diagnosis and testing is “borderline” case inclusion. This study aims to compare clinical outcomes after carpal tunnel release (CTR) between “borderline” and “clear” patients with CTS determined by NCS and US. Methods: This was a retrospective review of patients who underwent CTR. We collected NCS and US measurements of the median nerve cross-sectional area (MNCSA) at the carpal tunnel inlet, and the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) scores comprised of the Symptom Severity Scale (SSS) and the Functional Status Scale (FSS). Ultrasound measurements defined patients as having “borderline” (MNCSA < 13 mm 2 ) or “clear” (MNCSA ≥ 13 mm 2 ) CTS. Results: The study included 94 unilateral patients with CTS. “Borderline” CTS was diagnosed in 58 patients (62%), and “clear” CTS was diagnosed in 36 patients (38%). No significant differences in BCTQ scores were found between groups. At greater than 6-month follow-up, the mean FSS was 1.44 and 1.45 for clear and borderline groups, respectively ( P = .97) and the mean SSS was 1.47 and 1.51, respectively ( P = .84). However, a significant difference between groups when comparing distal motor latency (DML) and distal sensory latency (DSL) existed. The mean DSL was 3.71 and 4.44 for the clear and borderline groups, respectively ( P = .02). The mean DML was 4.59 and 5.36 ( P = .048). Conclusion: Categorizing CTS diagnosis into “borderline” and “clear” based on preoperative US and NCS testing did not correlate with BCTQ changes after CTR. It remains unclear whether the BCTQ is a valid postoperative assessment tool, despite its frequent use in literature.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI

祝大家在新的一年里科研腾飞
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
接点私活完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
1秒前
wanci应助ly采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
无限子轩发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
NexusExplorer应助马也君采纳,获得10
3秒前
khurram发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
完美世界应助GYPP采纳,获得10
3秒前
initial完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
滴答滴发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
闪闪蜜粉完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
所所应助野性的大山采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
Winreinln发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
缓慢洋葱完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
魈玖发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
zryyy发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
biubiu完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
三分发布了新的文献求助30
9秒前
miaomiao完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
顾矜应助研量采纳,获得10
10秒前
xh完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
xeason完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
魈玖完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
Lucas应助对科研祛魅的small采纳,获得10
12秒前
952414发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
英姑应助dudu5509采纳,获得10
15秒前
畅快焦发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
思源应助鸽子采纳,获得10
16秒前
Zw关注了科研通微信公众号
16秒前
淡定小白菜完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
stayloy完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
陆东发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
慕青应助小白采纳,获得10
19秒前
共享精神应助slempanda采纳,获得50
20秒前
SciGPT应助pp猪猪采纳,获得10
20秒前
ly完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
高分求助中
Востребованный временем 2500
Les Mantodea de Guyane 1000
Very-high-order BVD Schemes Using β-variable THINC Method 950
Field Guide to Insects of South Africa 660
The Three Stars Each: The Astrolabes and Related Texts 500
The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham: Rights, Representation, and Reform: Nonsense upon Stilts and Other Writings on the French Revolution 320
Machine Learning in Chemistry 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 细胞生物学 免疫学 冶金
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3386569
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2999668
关于积分的说明 8786168
捐赠科研通 2685344
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1470946
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 680031
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 672656