Does This Patient Have a Pleural Effusion?

医学 裂纹 置信区间 胸腔积液 背景(考古学) 诊断试验中的似然比 体格检查 前瞻性队列研究 放射科 物理疗法 外科 内科学 古生物学 生物
作者
Camilla L. Wong,Jayna Holroyd‐Leduc,Sharon E. Straus
出处
期刊:JAMA [American Medical Association]
卷期号:301 (3): 309-309 被引量:73
标识
DOI:10.1001/jama.2008.937
摘要

Context

Pleural effusion is a common finding among patients presenting with respiratory symptoms. The value of the bedside examination to detect pleural effusion is unclear.

Objective

To systematically review the evidence regarding the accuracy of the physical examination in assessing the probability of a pleural effusion.

Data Sources

We searched MEDLINE (1950-October 2008) and EMBASE (1980-October 2008) using Ovid to identify English-language studies conducted in a clinical setting. Additional studies were identified by searching the bibliographies of retrieved articles and contacting experts in the field.

Study Selection

We included prospective studies of diagnostic accuracy that compared at least 1 physical examination maneuver with radiographic confirmation of pleural effusion.

Data Extraction

Three authors independently appraised study quality and extracted relevant data. Data regarding participant recruitment, reference standard, diagnostic test(s), and test accuracy were extracted. Disagreements were resolved by consensus.

Data Synthesis

We identified 310 unique citations, but only 5 prospectively conducted studies met inclusion criteria (N = 934 patients). A random-effects model was used for quantitative synthesis. Of the 8 physical examination maneuvers evaluated in the included studies (conventional percussion, auscultatory percussion, breath sounds, chest expansion, tactile vocal fremitus, vocal resonance, crackles, and pleural friction rub), dullness to conventional percussion was most accurate for diagnosing pleural effusion (summary positive likelihood ratio, 8.7; 95% confidence interval, 2.2-33.8), while the absence of reduced tactile vocal fremitus made pleural effusion less likely (negative likelihood ratio, 0.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.12-0.37).

Conclusions

Based on the limited number of studies, dullness to percussion and tactile fremitus are the most useful findings for pleural effusion. Dull chest percussion makes the probability of a pleural effusion much more likely but requires a chest radiograph to confirm the diagnosis. When the pretest probability of pleural effusion is low, the absence of reduced tactile vocal fremitus makes pleural effusion less likely so that a chest radiograph might not be necessary depending on the overall clinical situation.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
1秒前
金色年华完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
丘比特应助daniel采纳,获得10
2秒前
我是老大应助szl采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
赤邪完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
小蘑菇应助复杂曼梅采纳,获得10
4秒前
5秒前
sexing完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
你好发布了新的文献求助150
6秒前
6秒前
BareBear应助wfc采纳,获得10
7秒前
Dsivan发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
可爱的函函应助赤邪采纳,获得10
8秒前
义气的傲松完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
张zi完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
wtg发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
法一完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
充电宝应助ysl采纳,获得30
10秒前
10秒前
诸葛语蝶完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
通~发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
xpp完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
dyh6802发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
12秒前
短腿小柯基完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
完美世界应助研一小刘采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
水萝卜完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
高高完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
甜甜晓露发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
ChiDaiOLD发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
16秒前
szl完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
17秒前
orixero应助跳跃的静曼采纳,获得10
17秒前
高分求助中
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 3000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Social media impact on athlete mental health: #RealityCheck 1020
Ensartinib (Ensacove) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer 1000
Unseen Mendieta: The Unpublished Works of Ana Mendieta 1000
Bacterial collagenases and their clinical applications 800
El viaje de una vida: Memorias de María Lecea 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 量子力学 光电子学 冶金
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3527928
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3108040
关于积分的说明 9287614
捐赠科研通 2805836
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1540070
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 716904
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 709808