Hearing loss and falls: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

听力损失 优势比 荟萃分析 医学 置信区间 可能性 系统回顾 毒物控制 梅德林 逻辑回归 听力学 急诊医学 内科学 政治学 法学
作者
Nicole T. Jiam,Carol Li,Yuri Agrawal
出处
期刊:Laryngoscope [Wiley]
卷期号:126 (11): 2587-2596 被引量:270
标识
DOI:10.1002/lary.25927
摘要

Background Falls are a devastating condition in older individuals. Identifying potentially modifiable risk factors such as hearing loss would provide a substantial public health benefit. Objective To evaluate the current evidence for an association between hearing loss and falls risk. Data Sources A systematic search of PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases was performed in July 2014. Study Eligibility Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were published in the peer‐reviewed literature. All studies used a predetermined definition of hearing loss. Main outcomes and measurements were fall hospitalization records or self‐reports of falls by structured interview or validated questionnaires. Study Appraisal and Synthesis Two investigators independently reviewed the literature related to hearing loss, falls, and older adults. We pooled effect sizes from across the studies and performed a meta‐analysis to compute an overall effect size. Results and Limitations Twelve eligible studies were identified. The odds of falling were 2.39 times greater among older adults with hearing loss than older adults with normal hearing (pooled odds ratio 2.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.11‐2.68). In sensitivity analyses, we restricted the meta‐analysis to studies where hearing loss was audiometrically defined (N = 6) and observed hearing loss to be associated with a 69% increase in the odds of falling (pooled odds ratio 1.69, 95% CI: 1.18‐2.19). When we further limited to studies that also performed multivariate regression analyses (N = 4), the overall effect size did not appreciably change (pooled odds ratio 1.72, 95% CI: 1.07‐2.37). We observed a potential positive publication bias in the literature. Limitations of the systematic review and meta‐analysis are the cross‐sectional designs of most studies and the heterogeneity across studies ( Q = 631, P < .05, I 2 = 98.1%). Conclusions and Relevance In the published literature, hearing loss is associated with a significantly increased odds of falling in older adults. These findings need to be interpreted in light of the potential for positive publication bias in the literature on this topic. Level of Evidence NA Laryngoscope , 126:2587–2596, 2016
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
乐乐应助lin采纳,获得10
刚刚
勤恳平卉发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
MoChin完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
星随我动完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
ghtsmile完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
小宇发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
狂野紫丝应助半夏微凉采纳,获得10
4秒前
QiongYin_123完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
莫妮卡发布了新的文献求助20
5秒前
闪闪的采珊完成签到 ,获得积分20
5秒前
6秒前
6秒前
arniu2008应助彩虹采纳,获得40
6秒前
7秒前
amour发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
Trent完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
释然zc完成签到,获得积分20
9秒前
9秒前
发Sci1完成签到,获得积分20
9秒前
10秒前
arniu2008发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
李文秀发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
Ruogu发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
科研通AI6.4应助Fiee采纳,获得10
12秒前
怡然蘑菇完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
关中人发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
内向书瑶完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
烟花应助天真代云采纳,获得10
13秒前
碎觉觉发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
爆米花应助初景采纳,获得10
14秒前
脑洞疼应助章鱼采纳,获得10
15秒前
我是老大应助六一采纳,获得10
15秒前
15秒前
iamonline2026关注了科研通微信公众号
15秒前
次氯酸发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
CipherSage应助安静的水蜜桃采纳,获得10
16秒前
木木完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
17秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
HYDROLYSE ACIDE DE QUELQUES DIOXASPIROCYCLANES 1314
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 800
Navigating Normative Orders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives 800
1 Peter and Christ's Descent to the Dead in Its Early Christian Reception 700
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7745925
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9293769
关于积分的说明 20222118
捐赠科研通 7325542
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3307982
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2459950
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2319405