Hearing loss and falls: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

听力损失 优势比 荟萃分析 医学 置信区间 可能性 系统回顾 毒物控制 梅德林 逻辑回归 听力学 急诊医学 内科学 政治学 法学
作者
Nicole T. Jiam,Carol Li,Yuri Agrawal
出处
期刊:Laryngoscope [Wiley]
卷期号:126 (11): 2587-2596 被引量:270
标识
DOI:10.1002/lary.25927
摘要

Background Falls are a devastating condition in older individuals. Identifying potentially modifiable risk factors such as hearing loss would provide a substantial public health benefit. Objective To evaluate the current evidence for an association between hearing loss and falls risk. Data Sources A systematic search of PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases was performed in July 2014. Study Eligibility Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were published in the peer‐reviewed literature. All studies used a predetermined definition of hearing loss. Main outcomes and measurements were fall hospitalization records or self‐reports of falls by structured interview or validated questionnaires. Study Appraisal and Synthesis Two investigators independently reviewed the literature related to hearing loss, falls, and older adults. We pooled effect sizes from across the studies and performed a meta‐analysis to compute an overall effect size. Results and Limitations Twelve eligible studies were identified. The odds of falling were 2.39 times greater among older adults with hearing loss than older adults with normal hearing (pooled odds ratio 2.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.11‐2.68). In sensitivity analyses, we restricted the meta‐analysis to studies where hearing loss was audiometrically defined (N = 6) and observed hearing loss to be associated with a 69% increase in the odds of falling (pooled odds ratio 1.69, 95% CI: 1.18‐2.19). When we further limited to studies that also performed multivariate regression analyses (N = 4), the overall effect size did not appreciably change (pooled odds ratio 1.72, 95% CI: 1.07‐2.37). We observed a potential positive publication bias in the literature. Limitations of the systematic review and meta‐analysis are the cross‐sectional designs of most studies and the heterogeneity across studies ( Q = 631, P < .05, I 2 = 98.1%). Conclusions and Relevance In the published literature, hearing loss is associated with a significantly increased odds of falling in older adults. These findings need to be interpreted in light of the potential for positive publication bias in the literature on this topic. Level of Evidence NA Laryngoscope , 126:2587–2596, 2016
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
ding的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
刚刚
刚刚
刚刚
爆米花的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
刚刚
刚刚
Hello的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
刚刚
1秒前
共享精神的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
Hello的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
Lucas的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
田様的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
丘比特的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
小蘑菇的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
糖醋里脊加醋完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
共享精神的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
酷波er的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
wy.he的应助被寒冷的霆采纳,获得10
2秒前
Jasper的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
wanci的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
华仔的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
打打的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
脑洞疼的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
Orange的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
慕青的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
chen完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
英姑的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
脑洞疼的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
小米渣发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
酷波er的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得20
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
研友_VZG7GZ的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
搜集达人的应助被lihaoran采纳,获得10
5秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
自動車の空力技術 800
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 800
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
Issues in Task-Based Language Teaching 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 工程类 有机化学 物理 复合材料 生物化学 内科学 细胞生物学 基因 遗传学 免疫学 冶金 光电子学 癌症研究
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7783663
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9322944
关于积分的说明 20392450
捐赠科研通 7372325
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3320727
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2468747
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2336971