Hearing loss and falls: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

听力损失 优势比 荟萃分析 医学 置信区间 可能性 系统回顾 毒物控制 梅德林 逻辑回归 听力学 急诊医学 内科学 政治学 法学
作者
Nicole T. Jiam,Carol Li,Yuri Agrawal
出处
期刊:Laryngoscope [Wiley]
卷期号:126 (11): 2587-2596 被引量:229
标识
DOI:10.1002/lary.25927
摘要

Background Falls are a devastating condition in older individuals. Identifying potentially modifiable risk factors such as hearing loss would provide a substantial public health benefit. Objective To evaluate the current evidence for an association between hearing loss and falls risk. Data Sources A systematic search of PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases was performed in July 2014. Study Eligibility Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were published in the peer‐reviewed literature. All studies used a predetermined definition of hearing loss. Main outcomes and measurements were fall hospitalization records or self‐reports of falls by structured interview or validated questionnaires. Study Appraisal and Synthesis Two investigators independently reviewed the literature related to hearing loss, falls, and older adults. We pooled effect sizes from across the studies and performed a meta‐analysis to compute an overall effect size. Results and Limitations Twelve eligible studies were identified. The odds of falling were 2.39 times greater among older adults with hearing loss than older adults with normal hearing (pooled odds ratio 2.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.11‐2.68). In sensitivity analyses, we restricted the meta‐analysis to studies where hearing loss was audiometrically defined (N = 6) and observed hearing loss to be associated with a 69% increase in the odds of falling (pooled odds ratio 1.69, 95% CI: 1.18‐2.19). When we further limited to studies that also performed multivariate regression analyses (N = 4), the overall effect size did not appreciably change (pooled odds ratio 1.72, 95% CI: 1.07‐2.37). We observed a potential positive publication bias in the literature. Limitations of the systematic review and meta‐analysis are the cross‐sectional designs of most studies and the heterogeneity across studies ( Q = 631, P < .05, I 2 = 98.1%). Conclusions and Relevance In the published literature, hearing loss is associated with a significantly increased odds of falling in older adults. These findings need to be interpreted in light of the potential for positive publication bias in the literature on this topic. Level of Evidence NA Laryngoscope , 126:2587–2596, 2016
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
大大怪发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
顾涵山发布了新的文献求助20
1秒前
1秒前
李十七完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
zzzkyt发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
李十七发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
彭于晏应助七曜采纳,获得10
4秒前
肖雪依发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
温暖雨灵发布了新的文献求助30
7秒前
小二郎应助逸晨采纳,获得10
7秒前
乐乐应助火柴盒采纳,获得10
8秒前
hahaha完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
可爱番茄完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
11秒前
13秒前
14秒前
dhu_johnny完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
16秒前
李十七发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
16秒前
16秒前
17秒前
汉堡包应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
17秒前
小马甲应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
17秒前
aldehyde应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
17秒前
17秒前
17秒前
柯一一应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
17秒前
科研通AI5应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
18秒前
18秒前
帅男发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
提拉米草完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
19秒前
七曜发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
Muhammad发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
奥特超曼应助飞飞飞采纳,获得10
20秒前
dhu_johnny发布了新的文献求助30
21秒前
高分求助中
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 12th edition 500
‘Unruly’ Children: Historical Fieldnotes and Learning Morality in a Taiwan Village (New Departures in Anthropology) 400
Indomethacinのヒトにおける経皮吸収 400
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 370
基于可调谐半导体激光吸收光谱技术泄漏气体检测系统的研究 350
Robot-supported joining of reinforcement textiles with one-sided sewing heads 320
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3989645
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3531805
关于积分的说明 11254983
捐赠科研通 3270372
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1804966
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 882136
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 809176