Hearing loss and falls: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

听力损失 优势比 荟萃分析 医学 置信区间 可能性 系统回顾 毒物控制 梅德林 逻辑回归 听力学 急诊医学 内科学 政治学 法学
作者
Nicole T. Jiam,Carol Li,Yuri Agrawal
出处
期刊:Laryngoscope [Wiley]
卷期号:126 (11): 2587-2596 被引量:270
标识
DOI:10.1002/lary.25927
摘要

Background Falls are a devastating condition in older individuals. Identifying potentially modifiable risk factors such as hearing loss would provide a substantial public health benefit. Objective To evaluate the current evidence for an association between hearing loss and falls risk. Data Sources A systematic search of PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases was performed in July 2014. Study Eligibility Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were published in the peer‐reviewed literature. All studies used a predetermined definition of hearing loss. Main outcomes and measurements were fall hospitalization records or self‐reports of falls by structured interview or validated questionnaires. Study Appraisal and Synthesis Two investigators independently reviewed the literature related to hearing loss, falls, and older adults. We pooled effect sizes from across the studies and performed a meta‐analysis to compute an overall effect size. Results and Limitations Twelve eligible studies were identified. The odds of falling were 2.39 times greater among older adults with hearing loss than older adults with normal hearing (pooled odds ratio 2.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.11‐2.68). In sensitivity analyses, we restricted the meta‐analysis to studies where hearing loss was audiometrically defined (N = 6) and observed hearing loss to be associated with a 69% increase in the odds of falling (pooled odds ratio 1.69, 95% CI: 1.18‐2.19). When we further limited to studies that also performed multivariate regression analyses (N = 4), the overall effect size did not appreciably change (pooled odds ratio 1.72, 95% CI: 1.07‐2.37). We observed a potential positive publication bias in the literature. Limitations of the systematic review and meta‐analysis are the cross‐sectional designs of most studies and the heterogeneity across studies ( Q = 631, P < .05, I 2 = 98.1%). Conclusions and Relevance In the published literature, hearing loss is associated with a significantly increased odds of falling in older adults. These findings need to be interpreted in light of the potential for positive publication bias in the literature on this topic. Level of Evidence NA Laryngoscope , 126:2587–2596, 2016
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
冰冰完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
夙杨发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
oi完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
3秒前
HYQ发布了新的文献求助20
3秒前
哈哈完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
5秒前
2428完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
司空晋鹏完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
瞬光完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
科研通AI6.1应助粒粒采纳,获得10
7秒前
9秒前
9秒前
Jasper应助muyunshen采纳,获得10
9秒前
夙杨完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
10秒前
10秒前
江医森爱吃肉完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
完美世界应助狂野的妙海采纳,获得10
12秒前
我是老大应助大胆的西装采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
12秒前
12秒前
轻松的颦完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
w1kend发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
娜娜发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
14秒前
15秒前
15秒前
15秒前
Zx发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
搜集达人应助everyone_woo采纳,获得10
16秒前
MJJJ发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
潇洒访波完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
鱼与渔发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
小陈发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Introduction to Helicopter and Tiltrotor Flight Simulation, Second Edition 2500
卤化钙钛矿人工突触的研究 2000
History of U.S. Space Surveillance and Satellite Cataloging 1000
Malcolm Fraser : a biography 700
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Materials selection in mechanical design 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6505876
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8299747
关于积分的说明 17717395
捐赠科研通 5606101
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2920584
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1897730
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1759966