Hearing loss and falls: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

听力损失 优势比 荟萃分析 医学 置信区间 可能性 系统回顾 毒物控制 梅德林 逻辑回归 听力学 急诊医学 内科学 政治学 法学
作者
Nicole T. Jiam,Carol Li,Yuri Agrawal
出处
期刊:Laryngoscope [Wiley]
卷期号:126 (11): 2587-2596 被引量:270
标识
DOI:10.1002/lary.25927
摘要

Background Falls are a devastating condition in older individuals. Identifying potentially modifiable risk factors such as hearing loss would provide a substantial public health benefit. Objective To evaluate the current evidence for an association between hearing loss and falls risk. Data Sources A systematic search of PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases was performed in July 2014. Study Eligibility Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were published in the peer‐reviewed literature. All studies used a predetermined definition of hearing loss. Main outcomes and measurements were fall hospitalization records or self‐reports of falls by structured interview or validated questionnaires. Study Appraisal and Synthesis Two investigators independently reviewed the literature related to hearing loss, falls, and older adults. We pooled effect sizes from across the studies and performed a meta‐analysis to compute an overall effect size. Results and Limitations Twelve eligible studies were identified. The odds of falling were 2.39 times greater among older adults with hearing loss than older adults with normal hearing (pooled odds ratio 2.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.11‐2.68). In sensitivity analyses, we restricted the meta‐analysis to studies where hearing loss was audiometrically defined (N = 6) and observed hearing loss to be associated with a 69% increase in the odds of falling (pooled odds ratio 1.69, 95% CI: 1.18‐2.19). When we further limited to studies that also performed multivariate regression analyses (N = 4), the overall effect size did not appreciably change (pooled odds ratio 1.72, 95% CI: 1.07‐2.37). We observed a potential positive publication bias in the literature. Limitations of the systematic review and meta‐analysis are the cross‐sectional designs of most studies and the heterogeneity across studies ( Q = 631, P < .05, I 2 = 98.1%). Conclusions and Relevance In the published literature, hearing loss is associated with a significantly increased odds of falling in older adults. These findings need to be interpreted in light of the potential for positive publication bias in the literature on this topic. Level of Evidence NA Laryngoscope , 126:2587–2596, 2016
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
sleepy发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
香蕉不言发布了新的文献求助40
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
布谷鸟发布了新的文献求助20
3秒前
3秒前
科研girl完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
freistie发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
充电宝的应助被俏皮的姣采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
不白发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
杨树林完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
wanci的应助被winwin采纳,获得10
6秒前
阿威发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
Sjejj完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
Marjan发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
8秒前
www1发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
yiyiii发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
XuQing完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
12秒前
好运完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
Unlung发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
李绿菊发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
Owen的应助被香蕉不言采纳,获得20
13秒前
15秒前
丘比特的应助被木木采纳,获得10
15秒前
羽毛完成签到,获得积分20
15秒前
16秒前
AceeD发布了新的文献求助20
16秒前
wanci的应助被Marjan采纳,获得10
16秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Energie-Contracting 1500
Spec 401: Standards for Jet Fuel Facility and Equipment Commissioning and Flushing at Airports, 2026.1 (Original Issue) 1000
Spec 103: Standard for Jet Fuel Quality Control at Airports, Revision 2026.1 1000
Klimaschutzrecht durch den Energiesektor im Mehrebenensystem – Ein Rechtsvergleich 1000
二维钙钛矿人工光电突触的可塑性及应用的研究 500
Topological Photonics: Fundamentals and Applications 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 8095385
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9506797
关于积分的说明 21456568
捐赠科研通 7669253
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3406289
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2534320
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2445703