Hearing loss and falls: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

听力损失 优势比 荟萃分析 医学 置信区间 可能性 系统回顾 毒物控制 梅德林 逻辑回归 听力学 急诊医学 内科学 政治学 法学
作者
Nicole T. Jiam,Carol Li,Yuri Agrawal
出处
期刊:Laryngoscope [Wiley]
卷期号:126 (11): 2587-2596 被引量:270
标识
DOI:10.1002/lary.25927
摘要

Background Falls are a devastating condition in older individuals. Identifying potentially modifiable risk factors such as hearing loss would provide a substantial public health benefit. Objective To evaluate the current evidence for an association between hearing loss and falls risk. Data Sources A systematic search of PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases was performed in July 2014. Study Eligibility Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were published in the peer‐reviewed literature. All studies used a predetermined definition of hearing loss. Main outcomes and measurements were fall hospitalization records or self‐reports of falls by structured interview or validated questionnaires. Study Appraisal and Synthesis Two investigators independently reviewed the literature related to hearing loss, falls, and older adults. We pooled effect sizes from across the studies and performed a meta‐analysis to compute an overall effect size. Results and Limitations Twelve eligible studies were identified. The odds of falling were 2.39 times greater among older adults with hearing loss than older adults with normal hearing (pooled odds ratio 2.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.11‐2.68). In sensitivity analyses, we restricted the meta‐analysis to studies where hearing loss was audiometrically defined (N = 6) and observed hearing loss to be associated with a 69% increase in the odds of falling (pooled odds ratio 1.69, 95% CI: 1.18‐2.19). When we further limited to studies that also performed multivariate regression analyses (N = 4), the overall effect size did not appreciably change (pooled odds ratio 1.72, 95% CI: 1.07‐2.37). We observed a potential positive publication bias in the literature. Limitations of the systematic review and meta‐analysis are the cross‐sectional designs of most studies and the heterogeneity across studies ( Q = 631, P < .05, I 2 = 98.1%). Conclusions and Relevance In the published literature, hearing loss is associated with a significantly increased odds of falling in older adults. These findings need to be interpreted in light of the potential for positive publication bias in the literature on this topic. Level of Evidence NA Laryngoscope , 126:2587–2596, 2016
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
刚刚
刘富宇发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
顾矜应助过时的孤晴采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
无情的山雁完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
nvatk16发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
Captain发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
LILI完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
123发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
沉默豆芽完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
充电宝应助小李采纳,获得10
9秒前
耶斯发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
烧炭匠完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
Ava应助董雪采纳,获得10
11秒前
Muamuac完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
小可完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
14秒前
烟味完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
太阳阳发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
DuMeng发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
17秒前
18秒前
18秒前
胡萝卜z发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
科研通AI6.4应助nzy采纳,获得10
19秒前
耶斯完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
乐乐应助lemon采纳,获得10
19秒前
香蕉觅云应助linger采纳,获得10
21秒前
莫1031完成签到,获得积分20
21秒前
lifenghou完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
23秒前
完美世界应助加油采纳,获得10
23秒前
23秒前
24秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Cronologia da história de Macau 5000
Braunwald’s Heart Disease, 2 Vol Set A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine 13th Edition 1000
Petrology and Plate Tectonics 800
Prompt Engineering for Clinicians: Harnessing AI in Everyday Medical Practice 600
Electrode Potentials 550
Handbook Of Synthetic Methodologies And Protocols Of Nanomaterials 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6997020
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8672903
关于积分的说明 18390326
捐赠科研通 6471303
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3099198
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2162277
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2075590