Hearing loss and falls: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

听力损失 优势比 荟萃分析 医学 置信区间 可能性 系统回顾 毒物控制 梅德林 逻辑回归 听力学 急诊医学 内科学 政治学 法学
作者
Nicole T. Jiam,Carol Li,Yuri Agrawal
出处
期刊:Laryngoscope [Wiley]
卷期号:126 (11): 2587-2596 被引量:270
标识
DOI:10.1002/lary.25927
摘要

Background Falls are a devastating condition in older individuals. Identifying potentially modifiable risk factors such as hearing loss would provide a substantial public health benefit. Objective To evaluate the current evidence for an association between hearing loss and falls risk. Data Sources A systematic search of PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases was performed in July 2014. Study Eligibility Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were published in the peer‐reviewed literature. All studies used a predetermined definition of hearing loss. Main outcomes and measurements were fall hospitalization records or self‐reports of falls by structured interview or validated questionnaires. Study Appraisal and Synthesis Two investigators independently reviewed the literature related to hearing loss, falls, and older adults. We pooled effect sizes from across the studies and performed a meta‐analysis to compute an overall effect size. Results and Limitations Twelve eligible studies were identified. The odds of falling were 2.39 times greater among older adults with hearing loss than older adults with normal hearing (pooled odds ratio 2.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.11‐2.68). In sensitivity analyses, we restricted the meta‐analysis to studies where hearing loss was audiometrically defined (N = 6) and observed hearing loss to be associated with a 69% increase in the odds of falling (pooled odds ratio 1.69, 95% CI: 1.18‐2.19). When we further limited to studies that also performed multivariate regression analyses (N = 4), the overall effect size did not appreciably change (pooled odds ratio 1.72, 95% CI: 1.07‐2.37). We observed a potential positive publication bias in the literature. Limitations of the systematic review and meta‐analysis are the cross‐sectional designs of most studies and the heterogeneity across studies ( Q = 631, P < .05, I 2 = 98.1%). Conclusions and Relevance In the published literature, hearing loss is associated with a significantly increased odds of falling in older adults. These findings need to be interpreted in light of the potential for positive publication bias in the literature on this topic. Level of Evidence NA Laryngoscope , 126:2587–2596, 2016
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
chengzugen发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
Altria完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
赖炫芬发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
隐形曼青应助peppa采纳,获得10
5秒前
shiyaouao发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
HMSCC完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
毛驴发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
徐亚楠发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
ding应助FunF采纳,获得10
10秒前
12秒前
科研通AI6.4应助暮叆采纳,获得10
12秒前
科研通AI6.3应助暮叆采纳,获得10
12秒前
科研通AI6.4应助暮叆采纳,获得10
12秒前
香蕉觅云应助暮叆采纳,获得10
12秒前
科研通AI6.3应助暮叆采纳,获得10
12秒前
英吉利25发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
搜集达人应助暮叆采纳,获得10
13秒前
汉堡包应助暮叆采纳,获得10
13秒前
无花果应助Luo采纳,获得30
13秒前
科研通AI6.3应助暮叆采纳,获得10
13秒前
酷波er应助暮叆采纳,获得10
13秒前
14秒前
chengzugen完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
香蕉觅云应助Lulu采纳,获得10
22秒前
oaker2021完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
科研通AI6.3应助健忘涟妖采纳,获得10
23秒前
26秒前
zzzzzz完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
29秒前
Silverexile发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
CodeCraft应助白白采纳,获得10
30秒前
ding应助英勇的天蓉采纳,获得10
30秒前
lll完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
31秒前
32秒前
小美完成签到,获得积分10
33秒前
zzzzzz发布了新的文献求助10
34秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Nondestructive Testing Handbook: Vol. 4, Thermal and Infrared Testing (IR), 4th ed 800
作者名:Kristopher P. Plain,悉尼大学的,目前只能查到其四篇论文,想找到其博士论文 590
Évora na Idade Média 555
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
Radical Reactions 500
Stratospheric Ozone: A Textbook 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7353868
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8964879
关于积分的说明 19046738
捐赠科研通 7002243
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3221808
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2386204
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2202542