Hearing loss and falls: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

听力损失 优势比 荟萃分析 医学 置信区间 可能性 系统回顾 毒物控制 梅德林 逻辑回归 听力学 急诊医学 内科学 政治学 法学
作者
Nicole T. Jiam,Carol Li,Yuri Agrawal
出处
期刊:Laryngoscope [Wiley]
卷期号:126 (11): 2587-2596 被引量:270
标识
DOI:10.1002/lary.25927
摘要

Background Falls are a devastating condition in older individuals. Identifying potentially modifiable risk factors such as hearing loss would provide a substantial public health benefit. Objective To evaluate the current evidence for an association between hearing loss and falls risk. Data Sources A systematic search of PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases was performed in July 2014. Study Eligibility Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were published in the peer‐reviewed literature. All studies used a predetermined definition of hearing loss. Main outcomes and measurements were fall hospitalization records or self‐reports of falls by structured interview or validated questionnaires. Study Appraisal and Synthesis Two investigators independently reviewed the literature related to hearing loss, falls, and older adults. We pooled effect sizes from across the studies and performed a meta‐analysis to compute an overall effect size. Results and Limitations Twelve eligible studies were identified. The odds of falling were 2.39 times greater among older adults with hearing loss than older adults with normal hearing (pooled odds ratio 2.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.11‐2.68). In sensitivity analyses, we restricted the meta‐analysis to studies where hearing loss was audiometrically defined (N = 6) and observed hearing loss to be associated with a 69% increase in the odds of falling (pooled odds ratio 1.69, 95% CI: 1.18‐2.19). When we further limited to studies that also performed multivariate regression analyses (N = 4), the overall effect size did not appreciably change (pooled odds ratio 1.72, 95% CI: 1.07‐2.37). We observed a potential positive publication bias in the literature. Limitations of the systematic review and meta‐analysis are the cross‐sectional designs of most studies and the heterogeneity across studies ( Q = 631, P < .05, I 2 = 98.1%). Conclusions and Relevance In the published literature, hearing loss is associated with a significantly increased odds of falling in older adults. These findings need to be interpreted in light of the potential for positive publication bias in the literature on this topic. Level of Evidence NA Laryngoscope , 126:2587–2596, 2016
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
SSY发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
丘比特应助687采纳,获得10
刚刚
lllym完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
阿华完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
wanci应助小叶轻舟采纳,获得10
3秒前
uzumay发布了新的文献求助50
4秒前
花花花完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
阿华发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
舒鑫发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
老张完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
小沫发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
ZS完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
evelynnni完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
JamesPei应助树雨采纳,获得10
11秒前
奔波霸发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
华仔应助想飞的兔子采纳,获得10
14秒前
15秒前
隐形曼青应助布丁圆团采纳,获得10
15秒前
15秒前
16秒前
忐忑的大白关注了科研通微信公众号
16秒前
MrPig完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
19秒前
秋秋发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
可爱的函函应助栖浔采纳,获得10
20秒前
20秒前
21秒前
sherry关注了科研通微信公众号
21秒前
21秒前
科研通AI6.4应助舒鑫采纳,获得10
22秒前
endlessloop发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
23秒前
沐曦完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
24秒前
24秒前
顾涵山发布了新的文献求助30
25秒前
黑米粥发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
咕咕呱呱关注了科研通微信公众号
25秒前
归海楷瑞完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
高分求助中
Principles of Economics, 11th Edition 10000
University Physics with Modern Physics, 16th edition 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis, 4th Edition 1000
Organic Reactions, Volume 116 1000
Current concepts in cutaneous toxicity : proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Cutaneous Toxicity, Washington, D.C., May 9-11, 1979 1000
The recovery-stress questionnaires : user manual 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7256539
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8878493
关于积分的说明 18752025
捐赠科研通 6936603
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3200872
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2375033
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2176529