Hearing loss and falls: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

听力损失 优势比 荟萃分析 医学 置信区间 可能性 系统回顾 毒物控制 梅德林 逻辑回归 听力学 急诊医学 内科学 政治学 法学
作者
Nicole T. Jiam,Carol Li,Yuri Agrawal
出处
期刊:Laryngoscope [Wiley]
卷期号:126 (11): 2587-2596 被引量:270
标识
DOI:10.1002/lary.25927
摘要

Background Falls are a devastating condition in older individuals. Identifying potentially modifiable risk factors such as hearing loss would provide a substantial public health benefit. Objective To evaluate the current evidence for an association between hearing loss and falls risk. Data Sources A systematic search of PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases was performed in July 2014. Study Eligibility Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were published in the peer‐reviewed literature. All studies used a predetermined definition of hearing loss. Main outcomes and measurements were fall hospitalization records or self‐reports of falls by structured interview or validated questionnaires. Study Appraisal and Synthesis Two investigators independently reviewed the literature related to hearing loss, falls, and older adults. We pooled effect sizes from across the studies and performed a meta‐analysis to compute an overall effect size. Results and Limitations Twelve eligible studies were identified. The odds of falling were 2.39 times greater among older adults with hearing loss than older adults with normal hearing (pooled odds ratio 2.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.11‐2.68). In sensitivity analyses, we restricted the meta‐analysis to studies where hearing loss was audiometrically defined (N = 6) and observed hearing loss to be associated with a 69% increase in the odds of falling (pooled odds ratio 1.69, 95% CI: 1.18‐2.19). When we further limited to studies that also performed multivariate regression analyses (N = 4), the overall effect size did not appreciably change (pooled odds ratio 1.72, 95% CI: 1.07‐2.37). We observed a potential positive publication bias in the literature. Limitations of the systematic review and meta‐analysis are the cross‐sectional designs of most studies and the heterogeneity across studies ( Q = 631, P < .05, I 2 = 98.1%). Conclusions and Relevance In the published literature, hearing loss is associated with a significantly increased odds of falling in older adults. These findings need to be interpreted in light of the potential for positive publication bias in the literature on this topic. Level of Evidence NA Laryngoscope , 126:2587–2596, 2016
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
algain完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
Wizzzzzzzy发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
necos发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
fmx完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
残剑月发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
weihongjuan发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
帅气的馒头应助酷炫初雪采纳,获得10
5秒前
janette完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
爆米花应助乌衣白马采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
财神爷心尖尖的宝儿完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
zyc发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
nn完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
阿屁屁猪完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
TearMarks完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
小白发布了新的文献求助200
9秒前
9秒前
酷波er应助baobaot采纳,获得10
10秒前
勿忘9451发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
研友_Z6G2D8完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
可爱的函函应助pjjpk01采纳,获得10
11秒前
贝尔摩德发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
CR完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
Liuya发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
13秒前
科目三应助辛勤面包采纳,获得10
13秒前
Mrlazy发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
小蘑菇应助马明旋采纳,获得10
13秒前
13秒前
14秒前
14秒前
紫丁香完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
16秒前
16秒前
陈BB发布了新的文献求助20
16秒前
ww完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Basic And Clinical Science Course 2025-2026 3000
Encyclopedia of Agriculture and Food Systems Third Edition 2000
人脑智能与人工智能 1000
花の香りの秘密―遺伝子情報から機能性まで 800
Principles of Plasma Discharges and Materials Processing, 3rd Edition 400
Pharmacology for Chemists: Drug Discovery in Context 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5608407
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4693040
关于积分的说明 14876313
捐赠科研通 4717445
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2544206
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1509230
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1472836