Hearing loss and falls: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

听力损失 优势比 荟萃分析 医学 置信区间 可能性 系统回顾 毒物控制 梅德林 逻辑回归 听力学 急诊医学 内科学 政治学 法学
作者
Nicole T. Jiam,Carol Li,Yuri Agrawal
出处
期刊:Laryngoscope [Wiley]
卷期号:126 (11): 2587-2596 被引量:270
标识
DOI:10.1002/lary.25927
摘要

Background Falls are a devastating condition in older individuals. Identifying potentially modifiable risk factors such as hearing loss would provide a substantial public health benefit. Objective To evaluate the current evidence for an association between hearing loss and falls risk. Data Sources A systematic search of PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases was performed in July 2014. Study Eligibility Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were published in the peer‐reviewed literature. All studies used a predetermined definition of hearing loss. Main outcomes and measurements were fall hospitalization records or self‐reports of falls by structured interview or validated questionnaires. Study Appraisal and Synthesis Two investigators independently reviewed the literature related to hearing loss, falls, and older adults. We pooled effect sizes from across the studies and performed a meta‐analysis to compute an overall effect size. Results and Limitations Twelve eligible studies were identified. The odds of falling were 2.39 times greater among older adults with hearing loss than older adults with normal hearing (pooled odds ratio 2.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.11‐2.68). In sensitivity analyses, we restricted the meta‐analysis to studies where hearing loss was audiometrically defined (N = 6) and observed hearing loss to be associated with a 69% increase in the odds of falling (pooled odds ratio 1.69, 95% CI: 1.18‐2.19). When we further limited to studies that also performed multivariate regression analyses (N = 4), the overall effect size did not appreciably change (pooled odds ratio 1.72, 95% CI: 1.07‐2.37). We observed a potential positive publication bias in the literature. Limitations of the systematic review and meta‐analysis are the cross‐sectional designs of most studies and the heterogeneity across studies ( Q = 631, P < .05, I 2 = 98.1%). Conclusions and Relevance In the published literature, hearing loss is associated with a significantly increased odds of falling in older adults. These findings need to be interpreted in light of the potential for positive publication bias in the literature on this topic. Level of Evidence NA Laryngoscope , 126:2587–2596, 2016
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
NexusExplorer的应助被HJJHJH采纳,获得30
刚刚
二开完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
现代的雯发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
共享精神的应助被lushiyang采纳,获得10
3秒前
kk的应助被TRBly采纳,获得50
3秒前
大个的应助被cai采纳,获得10
3秒前
4秒前
6秒前
Overlap完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
zxc发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
Ava的应助被六十变九十采纳,获得10
7秒前
曾经电源发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
8秒前
年华的应助被heqizheng采纳,获得10
9秒前
10秒前
Sabrina发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
金木研发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
12秒前
14秒前
刘宁发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
lcj1014发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
15秒前
zhp完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
李俊博发布了新的文献求助30
15秒前
16秒前
李爱国的应助被yeeun采纳,获得10
16秒前
乐乐的应助被刚刚好采纳,获得10
16秒前
17秒前
小马甲的应助被Brilliant采纳,获得10
17秒前
17秒前
秦霄贤老婆完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
18秒前
李健的小迷弟的应助被黑魔仙采纳,获得10
19秒前
19秒前
19秒前
zzzzzry发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Aspects of Post-SPE Phonology 2000
Nanocomposite Removal of Pesticides from Wastewater 1000
Performance standards for antimicrobial disk and dilution susceptibility tests for bacteria isolated from animals 888
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 800
Holistic Discourse Analysis, Second Edition by Robert E. Longacre (2012-09-10) 666
Final Report for the 2-D Test of Model 901 Rotor and Wing Airfoils (BSWT 592) 528
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 计算机科学 工程类 纳米技术 物理 有机化学 化学工程 内科学 生物化学 复合材料 催化作用 心理学 细胞生物学 无机化学 电极 光电子学 人工智能
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7891954
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9402982
关于积分的说明 20854283
捐赠科研通 7495228
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3358414
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2496686
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2387330