Hearing loss and falls: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

听力损失 优势比 荟萃分析 医学 置信区间 可能性 系统回顾 毒物控制 梅德林 逻辑回归 听力学 急诊医学 内科学 政治学 法学
作者
Nicole T. Jiam,Carol Li,Yuri Agrawal
出处
期刊:Laryngoscope [Wiley]
卷期号:126 (11): 2587-2596 被引量:229
标识
DOI:10.1002/lary.25927
摘要

Background Falls are a devastating condition in older individuals. Identifying potentially modifiable risk factors such as hearing loss would provide a substantial public health benefit. Objective To evaluate the current evidence for an association between hearing loss and falls risk. Data Sources A systematic search of PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases was performed in July 2014. Study Eligibility Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were published in the peer‐reviewed literature. All studies used a predetermined definition of hearing loss. Main outcomes and measurements were fall hospitalization records or self‐reports of falls by structured interview or validated questionnaires. Study Appraisal and Synthesis Two investigators independently reviewed the literature related to hearing loss, falls, and older adults. We pooled effect sizes from across the studies and performed a meta‐analysis to compute an overall effect size. Results and Limitations Twelve eligible studies were identified. The odds of falling were 2.39 times greater among older adults with hearing loss than older adults with normal hearing (pooled odds ratio 2.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.11‐2.68). In sensitivity analyses, we restricted the meta‐analysis to studies where hearing loss was audiometrically defined (N = 6) and observed hearing loss to be associated with a 69% increase in the odds of falling (pooled odds ratio 1.69, 95% CI: 1.18‐2.19). When we further limited to studies that also performed multivariate regression analyses (N = 4), the overall effect size did not appreciably change (pooled odds ratio 1.72, 95% CI: 1.07‐2.37). We observed a potential positive publication bias in the literature. Limitations of the systematic review and meta‐analysis are the cross‐sectional designs of most studies and the heterogeneity across studies ( Q = 631, P < .05, I 2 = 98.1%). Conclusions and Relevance In the published literature, hearing loss is associated with a significantly increased odds of falling in older adults. These findings need to be interpreted in light of the potential for positive publication bias in the literature on this topic. Level of Evidence NA Laryngoscope , 126:2587–2596, 2016
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
2秒前
4秒前
科研通AI2S应助ccciii采纳,获得10
4秒前
Rencal完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
研友_X89o6n完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
雪山飞龙发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
小二郎应助之雄采纳,获得10
8秒前
cc完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
软萌甜心小可爱完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
深情安青应助太叔夜南采纳,获得10
9秒前
赘婿应助奥里给采纳,获得10
10秒前
SASA完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
Samar完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
14秒前
14秒前
我爱螺蛳粉完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
一只桃完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
SciGPT应助萧水白采纳,获得100
15秒前
Dskelf完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
杨耑耑完成签到,获得积分20
16秒前
万能图书馆应助gaobowang采纳,获得10
17秒前
17秒前
18秒前
2021完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
21秒前
小面包完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
22秒前
之雄发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
23秒前
风雪丽人给风雪丽人的求助进行了留言
23秒前
24秒前
LeuinPonsgi完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
TTTT发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
wwz应助快乐芷珊采纳,获得10
28秒前
马俣辰发布了新的文献求助20
28秒前
29秒前
gaobowang发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
33秒前
34秒前
gaobowang完成签到,获得积分10
34秒前
高分求助中
Evolution 10000
The Young builders of New china : the visit of the delegation of the WFDY to the Chinese People's Republic 1000
юрские динозавры восточного забайкалья 800
English Wealden Fossils 700
Foreign Policy of the French Second Empire: A Bibliography 500
Chen Hansheng: China’s Last Romantic Revolutionary 500
China's Relations With Japan 1945-83: The Role of Liao Chengzhi 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3148036
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2799034
关于积分的说明 7833337
捐赠科研通 2456217
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1307159
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 628077
版权声明 601620