Hearing loss and falls: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

听力损失 优势比 荟萃分析 医学 置信区间 可能性 系统回顾 毒物控制 梅德林 逻辑回归 听力学 急诊医学 内科学 政治学 法学
作者
Nicole T. Jiam,Carol Li,Yuri Agrawal
出处
期刊:Laryngoscope [Wiley]
卷期号:126 (11): 2587-2596 被引量:270
标识
DOI:10.1002/lary.25927
摘要

Background Falls are a devastating condition in older individuals. Identifying potentially modifiable risk factors such as hearing loss would provide a substantial public health benefit. Objective To evaluate the current evidence for an association between hearing loss and falls risk. Data Sources A systematic search of PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases was performed in July 2014. Study Eligibility Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were published in the peer‐reviewed literature. All studies used a predetermined definition of hearing loss. Main outcomes and measurements were fall hospitalization records or self‐reports of falls by structured interview or validated questionnaires. Study Appraisal and Synthesis Two investigators independently reviewed the literature related to hearing loss, falls, and older adults. We pooled effect sizes from across the studies and performed a meta‐analysis to compute an overall effect size. Results and Limitations Twelve eligible studies were identified. The odds of falling were 2.39 times greater among older adults with hearing loss than older adults with normal hearing (pooled odds ratio 2.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.11‐2.68). In sensitivity analyses, we restricted the meta‐analysis to studies where hearing loss was audiometrically defined (N = 6) and observed hearing loss to be associated with a 69% increase in the odds of falling (pooled odds ratio 1.69, 95% CI: 1.18‐2.19). When we further limited to studies that also performed multivariate regression analyses (N = 4), the overall effect size did not appreciably change (pooled odds ratio 1.72, 95% CI: 1.07‐2.37). We observed a potential positive publication bias in the literature. Limitations of the systematic review and meta‐analysis are the cross‐sectional designs of most studies and the heterogeneity across studies ( Q = 631, P < .05, I 2 = 98.1%). Conclusions and Relevance In the published literature, hearing loss is associated with a significantly increased odds of falling in older adults. These findings need to be interpreted in light of the potential for positive publication bias in the literature on this topic. Level of Evidence NA Laryngoscope , 126:2587–2596, 2016
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
刚刚
chenfaju完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
张子陌完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
Lei发布了新的文献求助20
5秒前
22yh发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
学霸业应助卷心菜的菜采纳,获得10
6秒前
xinyi完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
9秒前
香蕉觅云应助二二春采纳,获得10
9秒前
Lei完成签到,获得积分20
10秒前
SHADIAO发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
和谐熠彤完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
刘峰完成签到,获得积分20
11秒前
充电宝应助Zeus采纳,获得10
12秒前
NexusExplorer应助阿涛采纳,获得30
12秒前
12秒前
何文鑫发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
天玄一刀完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
14秒前
所所应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
14秒前
14秒前
14秒前
丘比特应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
14秒前
彭于晏应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
14秒前
JamesPei应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
14秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
14秒前
吃花完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
赘婿应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
14秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助笑点低雨双采纳,获得10
14秒前
852应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
14秒前
科研通AI6.4应助和谐熠彤采纳,获得10
14秒前
Nole应助行行采纳,获得10
16秒前
昂帕帕斯完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
自由沂完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
Andy发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
19秒前
19秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
48V Low-voltage Power Distribution Network (PDN) Architecture Industry Report, 2024 800
Fundamentals of Pharmaceutical and Biologics Regulations: A Global Perspective, Second Edition 700
Direct and Iterative Linear System Solvers 500
Plato's Parmenides. A Constructive Reading 500
Vander's Renal Physiology第10版 500
Poetics of Cognition 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7303957
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8922042
关于积分的说明 18900159
捐赠科研通 6967475
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3212050
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2380835
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2189238