损害赔偿
动作(物理)
立法
指令
法学
诉讼原因
不复苏命令
政治学
生命支持护理
订单(交换)
心理学
法律与经济学
医学
业务
社会学
医疗急救
最高法院
梅德林
程序设计语言
物理
量子力学
计算机科学
财务
作者
Nicole Marie Saitta,Samuel D. Hodge
出处
期刊:PubMed
日期:2013-12-01
卷期号:32 (4): 441-58
被引量:8
摘要
Does a valid cause of action exist against a health care provider who intentionally disregards a "do-not resuscitate order," prolonging a patient's life? Wrongful prolongation of life has not gained traction in the United States. Although the issue has garnered media attention and has raised awareness of advanced directives, physicians still may disregard a patient's last wishes for fear of legal reprisal or due to lack of communication. This article examines key cases and explains the differences between living wills, advanced directives and proxies. Claims have been advanced under theories of battery, Constitutional violations, breach of contract, infliction of emotional distress, and negligence, but no cause of action has allowed monetary damages. Courts maintain that it is not their place to judge an impaired life as being less valuable than no life. A state-by-state analysis of legislation concerning advanced directives follows along with a discussion of the Patient Self-Determination Act.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI