已入深夜,您辛苦了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!祝你早点完成任务,早点休息,好梦!

Subcutaneously administered tirzepatide vs semaglutide for adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

赛马鲁肽 医学 荟萃分析 安慰剂 内科学 2型糖尿病 随机对照试验 置信区间 不利影响 糖尿病 内分泌学 利拉鲁肽 替代医学 病理
作者
Thomas Karagiannis,Konstantinos Malandris,Ioannis Avgerinos,Athina Stamati,Panagiota Kakotrichi,Aris Liakos,Despoina Vasilakou,Nikolaos Kakaletsis,Απόστολος Τσάπας,Eleni Bekiari
出处
期刊:Diabetologia [Springer Nature]
卷期号:67 (7): 1206-1222 被引量:70
标识
DOI:10.1007/s00125-024-06144-1
摘要

Abstract Aims/hypothesis We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of s.c. administered tirzepatide vs s.c. administered semaglutide for adults of both sexes with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods We searched PubMed and Cochrane up to 11 November 2023 for RCTs with an intervention duration of at least 12 weeks assessing s.c. tirzepatide at maintenance doses of 5 mg, 10 mg or 15 mg once weekly, or s.c. semaglutide at maintenance doses of 0.5 mg, 1.0 mg or 2.0 mg once weekly, in adults with type 2 diabetes, regardless of background glucose-lowering treatment. Eligible trials compared any of the specified doses of tirzepatide and semaglutide against each other, placebo or other glucose-lowering drugs. Primary outcomes were changes in HbA 1c and body weight from baseline. Secondary outcomes were achievement of HbA 1c target of ≤48 mmol/mol (≤6.5%) or <53 mmol/mol (<7.0%), body weight loss of at least 10%, and safety outcomes including gastrointestinal adverse events and severe hypoglycaemia. We used version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (ROB 2) to assess the risk of bias, conducted frequentist random-effects network meta-analyses and evaluated confidence in effect estimates utilising the Confidence In Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) framework. Results A total of 28 trials with 23,622 participants (44.2% female) were included. Compared with placebo, tirzepatide 15 mg was the most efficacious treatment in reducing HbA 1c (mean difference −21.61 mmol/mol [−1.96%]) followed by tirzepatide 10 mg (−20.19 mmol/mol [−1.84%]), semaglutide 2.0 mg (−17.74 mmol/mol [−1.59%]), tirzepatide 5 mg (−17.60 mmol/mol [−1.60%]), semaglutide 1.0 mg (−15.25 mmol/mol [−1.39%]) and semaglutide 0.5 mg (−12.00 mmol/mol [−1.09%]). In between-drug comparisons, all tirzepatide doses were comparable with semaglutide 2.0 mg and superior to semaglutide 1.0 mg and 0.5 mg. Compared with placebo, tirzepatide was more efficacious than semaglutide for reducing body weight, with reductions ranging from 9.57 kg (tirzepatide 15 mg) to 5.27 kg (tirzepatide 5 mg). Semaglutide had a less pronounced effect, with reductions ranging from 4.97 kg (semaglutide 2.0 mg) to 2.52 kg (semaglutide 0.5 mg). In between-drug comparisons, tirzepatide 15 mg, 10 mg and 5 mg demonstrated greater efficacy than semaglutide 2.0 mg, 1.0 mg and 0.5 mg, respectively. Both drugs increased incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events compared with placebo, while neither tirzepatide nor semaglutide increased the risk of serious adverse events or severe hypoglycaemia. Conclusions/interpretation Our data show that s.c. tirzepatide had a more pronounced effect on HbA 1c and weight reduction compared with s.c. semaglutide in people with type 2 diabetes. Both drugs, particularly higher doses of tirzepatide, increased gastrointestinal adverse events. Registration PROSPERO registration no. CRD42022382594 Graphical Abstract
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
短短急个球完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
所所应助ceeray23采纳,获得20
1秒前
Noob_saibot发布了新的文献求助30
2秒前
趁热拿铁完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
张佳星完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
李健的粉丝团团长应助zgy采纳,获得10
6秒前
2025alex完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
小蘑菇应助pluviophile采纳,获得10
10秒前
两仪发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
13秒前
英勇可乐发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
牛八先生完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
22秒前
保奔完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
Simpson完成签到 ,获得积分0
23秒前
爱笑的绮露完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
骨科小李完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
tkx是流氓兔完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
mmy完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
保奔发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
26秒前
动听衬衫发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
无花果应助英勇可乐采纳,获得10
28秒前
潇湘完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
安静无招完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
何为完成签到 ,获得积分10
30秒前
30秒前
mmyhn发布了新的文献求助10
31秒前
着急的青枫应助Ttttsyu采纳,获得10
33秒前
两仪完成签到,获得积分10
34秒前
pjxxx完成签到 ,获得积分10
34秒前
35秒前
风筝鱼完成签到 ,获得积分10
36秒前
fsznc1完成签到 ,获得积分0
36秒前
sxmt123456789完成签到,获得积分10
37秒前
年少丶完成签到,获得积分10
39秒前
leslie发布了新的文献求助10
39秒前
27完成签到 ,获得积分10
39秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, Multi-Volume, 5th Edition 临床微生物学程序手册,多卷,第5版 2000
List of 1,091 Public Pension Profiles by Region 1621
Les Mantodea de Guyane: Insecta, Polyneoptera [The Mantids of French Guiana] | NHBS Field Guides & Natural History 1500
The Victim–Offender Overlap During the Global Pandemic: A Comparative Study Across Western and Non-Western Countries 1000
King Tyrant 720
T/CIET 1631—2025《构网型柔性直流输电技术应用指南》 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5590231
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4674624
关于积分的说明 14794913
捐赠科研通 4630761
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2532630
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1501218
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1468576