亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Subcutaneously administered tirzepatide vs semaglutide for adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

赛马鲁肽 医学 荟萃分析 安慰剂 内科学 2型糖尿病 随机对照试验 置信区间 不利影响 糖尿病 内分泌学 利拉鲁肽 病理 替代医学
作者
Thomas Karagiannis,Konstantinos Malandris,Ioannis Avgerinos,Athina Stamati,Panagiota Kakotrichi,Aris Liakos,Despoina Vasilakou,Nikolaos Kakaletsis,Απόστολος Τσάπας,Eleni Bekiari
出处
期刊:Diabetologia [Springer Science+Business Media]
卷期号:67 (7): 1206-1222 被引量:49
标识
DOI:10.1007/s00125-024-06144-1
摘要

Abstract Aims/hypothesis We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of s.c. administered tirzepatide vs s.c. administered semaglutide for adults of both sexes with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods We searched PubMed and Cochrane up to 11 November 2023 for RCTs with an intervention duration of at least 12 weeks assessing s.c. tirzepatide at maintenance doses of 5 mg, 10 mg or 15 mg once weekly, or s.c. semaglutide at maintenance doses of 0.5 mg, 1.0 mg or 2.0 mg once weekly, in adults with type 2 diabetes, regardless of background glucose-lowering treatment. Eligible trials compared any of the specified doses of tirzepatide and semaglutide against each other, placebo or other glucose-lowering drugs. Primary outcomes were changes in HbA 1c and body weight from baseline. Secondary outcomes were achievement of HbA 1c target of ≤48 mmol/mol (≤6.5%) or <53 mmol/mol (<7.0%), body weight loss of at least 10%, and safety outcomes including gastrointestinal adverse events and severe hypoglycaemia. We used version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (ROB 2) to assess the risk of bias, conducted frequentist random-effects network meta-analyses and evaluated confidence in effect estimates utilising the Confidence In Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) framework. Results A total of 28 trials with 23,622 participants (44.2% female) were included. Compared with placebo, tirzepatide 15 mg was the most efficacious treatment in reducing HbA 1c (mean difference −21.61 mmol/mol [−1.96%]) followed by tirzepatide 10 mg (−20.19 mmol/mol [−1.84%]), semaglutide 2.0 mg (−17.74 mmol/mol [−1.59%]), tirzepatide 5 mg (−17.60 mmol/mol [−1.60%]), semaglutide 1.0 mg (−15.25 mmol/mol [−1.39%]) and semaglutide 0.5 mg (−12.00 mmol/mol [−1.09%]). In between-drug comparisons, all tirzepatide doses were comparable with semaglutide 2.0 mg and superior to semaglutide 1.0 mg and 0.5 mg. Compared with placebo, tirzepatide was more efficacious than semaglutide for reducing body weight, with reductions ranging from 9.57 kg (tirzepatide 15 mg) to 5.27 kg (tirzepatide 5 mg). Semaglutide had a less pronounced effect, with reductions ranging from 4.97 kg (semaglutide 2.0 mg) to 2.52 kg (semaglutide 0.5 mg). In between-drug comparisons, tirzepatide 15 mg, 10 mg and 5 mg demonstrated greater efficacy than semaglutide 2.0 mg, 1.0 mg and 0.5 mg, respectively. Both drugs increased incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events compared with placebo, while neither tirzepatide nor semaglutide increased the risk of serious adverse events or severe hypoglycaemia. Conclusions/interpretation Our data show that s.c. tirzepatide had a more pronounced effect on HbA 1c and weight reduction compared with s.c. semaglutide in people with type 2 diabetes. Both drugs, particularly higher doses of tirzepatide, increased gastrointestinal adverse events. Registration PROSPERO registration no. CRD42022382594 Graphical Abstract
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
DPH完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
10秒前
11秒前
博ge发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
大胆楷瑞完成签到,获得积分20
13秒前
14秒前
16秒前
大胆楷瑞发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
Unicorn完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
23秒前
青柠完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
共享精神应助大胆楷瑞采纳,获得10
27秒前
38秒前
梦鱼完成签到,获得积分10
39秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
41秒前
木有完成签到 ,获得积分10
46秒前
46秒前
追风少年完成签到 ,获得积分10
48秒前
52秒前
56秒前
不羁完成签到,获得积分10
57秒前
queen发布了新的文献求助30
59秒前
优秀发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
打工dog完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
饱满的映天完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
null应助YCYycy采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
甜甜的以筠完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
moiaoh完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
充电宝应助八爪鱼采纳,获得10
1分钟前
哈哈哈哈完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
谷雨完成签到 ,获得积分20
1分钟前
许多多完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
jyy完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
汪鸡毛完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
2分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
计划经济时代的工厂管理与工人状况(1949-1966)——以郑州市国营工厂为例 500
Comparison of spinal anesthesia and general anesthesia in total hip and total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review 500
INQUIRY-BASED PEDAGOGY TO SUPPORT STEM LEARNING AND 21ST CENTURY SKILLS: PREPARING NEW TEACHERS TO IMPLEMENT PROJECT AND PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING 500
Modern Britain, 1750 to the Present (第2版) 300
Writing to the Rhythm of Labor Cultural Politics of the Chinese Revolution, 1942–1976 300
Lightning Wires: The Telegraph and China's Technological Modernization, 1860-1890 250
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 催化作用 遗传学 冶金 电极 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4594910
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4007539
关于积分的说明 12408163
捐赠科研通 3685935
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2031557
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1064815
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 950145