清晨好,您是今天最早来到科研通的研友!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您科研之路漫漫前行!

Subcutaneously administered tirzepatide vs semaglutide for adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

赛马鲁肽 医学 荟萃分析 安慰剂 内科学 2型糖尿病 随机对照试验 置信区间 不利影响 糖尿病 内分泌学 利拉鲁肽 病理 替代医学
作者
Thomas Karagiannis,Konstantinos Malandris,Ioannis Avgerinos,Athina Stamati,Panagiota Kakotrichi,Aris Liakos,Despoina Vasilakou,Nikolaos Kakaletsis,Απόστολος Τσάπας,Eleni Bekiari
出处
期刊:Diabetologia [Springer Science+Business Media]
卷期号:67 (7): 1206-1222 被引量:60
标识
DOI:10.1007/s00125-024-06144-1
摘要

Abstract Aims/hypothesis We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of s.c. administered tirzepatide vs s.c. administered semaglutide for adults of both sexes with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods We searched PubMed and Cochrane up to 11 November 2023 for RCTs with an intervention duration of at least 12 weeks assessing s.c. tirzepatide at maintenance doses of 5 mg, 10 mg or 15 mg once weekly, or s.c. semaglutide at maintenance doses of 0.5 mg, 1.0 mg or 2.0 mg once weekly, in adults with type 2 diabetes, regardless of background glucose-lowering treatment. Eligible trials compared any of the specified doses of tirzepatide and semaglutide against each other, placebo or other glucose-lowering drugs. Primary outcomes were changes in HbA 1c and body weight from baseline. Secondary outcomes were achievement of HbA 1c target of ≤48 mmol/mol (≤6.5%) or <53 mmol/mol (<7.0%), body weight loss of at least 10%, and safety outcomes including gastrointestinal adverse events and severe hypoglycaemia. We used version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (ROB 2) to assess the risk of bias, conducted frequentist random-effects network meta-analyses and evaluated confidence in effect estimates utilising the Confidence In Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) framework. Results A total of 28 trials with 23,622 participants (44.2% female) were included. Compared with placebo, tirzepatide 15 mg was the most efficacious treatment in reducing HbA 1c (mean difference −21.61 mmol/mol [−1.96%]) followed by tirzepatide 10 mg (−20.19 mmol/mol [−1.84%]), semaglutide 2.0 mg (−17.74 mmol/mol [−1.59%]), tirzepatide 5 mg (−17.60 mmol/mol [−1.60%]), semaglutide 1.0 mg (−15.25 mmol/mol [−1.39%]) and semaglutide 0.5 mg (−12.00 mmol/mol [−1.09%]). In between-drug comparisons, all tirzepatide doses were comparable with semaglutide 2.0 mg and superior to semaglutide 1.0 mg and 0.5 mg. Compared with placebo, tirzepatide was more efficacious than semaglutide for reducing body weight, with reductions ranging from 9.57 kg (tirzepatide 15 mg) to 5.27 kg (tirzepatide 5 mg). Semaglutide had a less pronounced effect, with reductions ranging from 4.97 kg (semaglutide 2.0 mg) to 2.52 kg (semaglutide 0.5 mg). In between-drug comparisons, tirzepatide 15 mg, 10 mg and 5 mg demonstrated greater efficacy than semaglutide 2.0 mg, 1.0 mg and 0.5 mg, respectively. Both drugs increased incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events compared with placebo, while neither tirzepatide nor semaglutide increased the risk of serious adverse events or severe hypoglycaemia. Conclusions/interpretation Our data show that s.c. tirzepatide had a more pronounced effect on HbA 1c and weight reduction compared with s.c. semaglutide in people with type 2 diabetes. Both drugs, particularly higher doses of tirzepatide, increased gastrointestinal adverse events. Registration PROSPERO registration no. CRD42022382594 Graphical Abstract
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
JavedAli发布了新的文献求助200
7秒前
TOUHOUU完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
充电宝应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
35秒前
FashionBoy应助科研通管家采纳,获得150
35秒前
juan完成签到 ,获得积分0
45秒前
方白秋完成签到,获得积分0
1分钟前
以七完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
以七关注了科研通微信公众号
2分钟前
Rayyu_0905完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
kbcbwb2002完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
朴实的小萱完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
任性翠安完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
浮游应助Said1223采纳,获得10
3分钟前
无花果应助达西苏采纳,获得10
3分钟前
达西苏给达西苏的求助进行了留言
4分钟前
bellapp完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
GingerF应助科研通管家采纳,获得150
4分钟前
al完成签到 ,获得积分0
4分钟前
4分钟前
5分钟前
深情安青应助十点差一分采纳,获得10
5分钟前
十点差一分完成签到,获得积分10
5分钟前
月半完成签到,获得积分10
5分钟前
达西苏关注了科研通微信公众号
6分钟前
hugeyoung完成签到,获得积分10
7分钟前
7分钟前
达西苏发布了新的文献求助10
7分钟前
heisa完成签到,获得积分10
8分钟前
Otter完成签到,获得积分0
8分钟前
gmc完成签到 ,获得积分10
8分钟前
9分钟前
11分钟前
鲤鱼山人完成签到 ,获得积分10
11分钟前
博ge完成签到 ,获得积分10
12分钟前
yyds给张景赛的求助进行了留言
12分钟前
13分钟前
科研通AI2S应助guan采纳,获得10
13分钟前
学习使勇哥进步完成签到,获得积分10
14分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Kolmogorov, A. N. Qualitative study of mathematical models of populations. Problems of Cybernetics, 1972, 25, 100-106 800
Vertébrés continentaux du Crétacé supérieur de Provence (Sud-Est de la France) 600
A complete Carnosaur Skeleton From Zigong, Sichuan- Yangchuanosaurus Hepingensis 四川自贡一完整肉食龙化石-和平永川龙 600
FUNDAMENTAL STUDY OF ADAPTIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS 500
微纳米加工技术及其应用 500
Nanoelectronics and Information Technology: Advanced Electronic Materials and Novel Devices 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 遗传学 催化作用 冶金 量子力学 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5303142
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4450073
关于积分的说明 13848990
捐赠科研通 4336590
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2381008
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1375962
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1342508