Deferred cord clamping, cord milking, and immediate cord clamping at preterm birth: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis

医学 荟萃分析 脐带 随机对照试验 线夹 怀孕 绳索 产科 儿科 外科 内科学 遗传学 生物 解剖
作者
Anna Lene Seidler,Mason Aberoumand,Kylie E Hunter,Angie Barba,Sol Libesman,Jonathan G. Williams,Nipun Shrestha,Jannik Aagerup,James X. Sotiropoulos,Alan Montgomery,Gillian ML Gyte,Lelia Duley,Lisa Askie,Anna Lene Seidler,Mason Aberoumand,Kylie E Hunter,Angie Barba,Sol Libesman,Jonathan G. Williams,Nipun Shrestha
出处
期刊:The Lancet [Elsevier]
卷期号:402 (10418): 2209-2222 被引量:47
标识
DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(23)02468-6
摘要

Background Umbilical cord clamping strategies at preterm birth have the potential to affect important health outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of deferred cord clamping, umbilical cord milking, and immediate cord clamping in reducing neonatal mortality and morbidity at preterm birth. Methods We conducted a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. We searched medical databases and trial registries (from database inception until Feb 24, 2022; updated June 6, 2023) for randomised controlled trials comparing deferred (also known as delayed) cord clamping, cord milking, and immediate cord clamping for preterm births (<37 weeks' gestation). Quasi-randomised or cluster-randomised trials were excluded. Authors of eligible studies were invited to join the iCOMP collaboration and share individual participant data. All data were checked, harmonised, re-coded, and assessed for risk of bias following prespecified criteria. The primary outcome was death before hospital discharge. We performed intention-to-treat one-stage individual participant data meta-analyses accounting for heterogeneity to examine treatment effects overall and in prespecified subgroup analyses. Certainty of evidence was assessed with Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42019136640. Findings We identified 2369 records, of which 48 randomised trials provided individual participant data and were eligible for our primary analysis. We included individual participant data on 6367 infants (3303 [55%] male, 2667 [45%] female, two intersex, and 395 missing data). Deferred cord clamping, compared with immediate cord clamping, reduced death before discharge (odds ratio [OR] 0·68 [95% CI 0·51–0·91], high-certainty evidence, 20 studies, n=3260, 232 deaths). For umbilical cord milking compared with immediate cord clamping, no clear evidence was found of a difference in death before discharge (OR 0·73 [0·44–1·20], low certainty, 18 studies, n=1561, 74 deaths). Similarly, for umbilical cord milking compared with deferred cord clamping, no clear evidence was found of a difference in death before discharge (0·95 [0·59–1·53], low certainty, 12 studies, n=1303, 93 deaths). We found no evidence of subgroup differences for the primary outcome, including by gestational age, type of delivery, multiple birth, study year, and perinatal mortality. Interpretation This study provides high-certainty evidence that deferred cord clamping, compared with immediate cord clamping, reduces death before discharge in preterm infants. This effect appears to be consistent across several participant-level and trial-level subgroups. These results will inform international treatment recommendations. Funding Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
上官若男应助123采纳,获得10
1秒前
你好发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
H6发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
范东乐发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
liuchzzyy发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
qin发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
星辰发布了新的文献求助30
3秒前
彩虹发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
bryan.yuan完成签到,获得积分0
4秒前
共享精神应助金2022采纳,获得10
6秒前
碧蓝青梦发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
卷卷发布了新的文献求助30
7秒前
Akim应助虚心的大雄采纳,获得10
7秒前
bcy发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
Miao发布了新的文献求助30
8秒前
思源应助棺姬采纳,获得10
8秒前
深情安青应助郑翠勤采纳,获得30
9秒前
11秒前
11秒前
WR发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
13秒前
田様应助紫杉罗罗采纳,获得10
14秒前
14秒前
14秒前
15秒前
15秒前
QOP应助555采纳,获得10
15秒前
雪白大象完成签到,获得积分20
16秒前
16秒前
17秒前
SBoot完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
共享精神应助星辰采纳,获得10
18秒前
李爱国应助wwzn采纳,获得10
18秒前
yanyan发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Research for Social Workers 1000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 510
Discrete-Time Signals and Systems 510
Kinesiophobia : a new view of chronic pain behavior 500
《The Emergency Nursing High-Yield Guide》 (或简称为 Emergency Nursing High-Yield Essentials) 500
The Dance of Butch/Femme: The Complementarity and Autonomy of Lesbian Gender Identity 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5889218
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 6653080
关于积分的说明 15712961
捐赠科研通 5010521
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2698871
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1643744
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1596403