Accumulated Hard Tissue Debris and Root Canal Shaping Profiles Following Instrumentation with Gentlefile, One Curve, and Reciproc Blue

This laboratory study aimed to evaluate the accumulated hard tissue debris (AHTD) and shaping performance following root canal instrumentation with a novel stainless steel rotary system (Gentlefile; MedicNRG, Kibbutz Afikim, Israel) compared with two single-file nickel-titanium instruments of different kinematics through micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) analysis.Thirty isthmus-containing mesial roots of human mandibular molars with a curvature of 15°-35° were scanned with micro-CT at an isotropic resolution of 12 μm and randomly assigned to three groups (n = 10) according to the instruments used for canal preparation: Gentlefile (GF; #23/.04), One Curve (OC; #25/.06; Micro-Mega, Besancon, France), and Reciproc Blue R25 (RB; #25/.08; VDW, Munich, Germany). The AHTD, unprepared canal surface area, volume changes, surface area changes, and transportation were evaluated by comparing preoperative and postoperative micro-CT images. In addition, the time required for canal preparation was recorded. Data were statistically analyzed using the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test or the Kruskal-Wallis test at a significance level of 5%.No significant differences were observed in the percentage of AHTD or in the unprepared canal surface area between the three groups (P > .05). The RB group demonstrated a significantly greater percentage increase in volume and surface area than the GF group (P < .05). The GF and OC groups showed significantly less transportation at 3 mm from the apex than the RB group (P < .001). The OC group required significantly less time for instrumentation than the RB and GF groups (P < .05).Instrumentation with GF (#23/.04), OC, and RB yielded similar levels of AHTD and unprepared surface area in isthmus-containing curved canals. GF achieved this with less dentin removal and apical transportation, at the expense of a longer preparation time.