The optimal healthy ranges of thyroid function defined by the risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality: systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis

Summary

Background

Reference intervals of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and free thyroxine (FT₄) are statistically defined by the 2·5–97·5th percentiles, without accounting for potential risk of clinical outcomes. We aimed to define the optimal healthy ranges of TSH and FT₄ based on the risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality.

Methods

This systematic review and individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis identified eligible prospective cohorts through the Thyroid Studies Collaboration, supplemented with a systematic search via Embase, MEDLINE (Ovid), Web of science, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar from Jan 1, 2011, to Feb 12, 2017 with an updated search to Oct 13, 2022 (cohorts found in the second search were not included in the IPD). We included cohorts that collected TSH or FT₄, and cardiovascular outcomes or mortality for adults (aged ≥18 years). We excluded cohorts that included solely pregnant women, individuals with overt thyroid diseases, and individuals with cardiovascular disease. We contacted the study investigators of eligible cohorts to provide IPD on demographics, TSH, FT₄, thyroid peroxidase antibodies, history of cardiovascular disease and risk factors, medication use, cardiovascular disease events, cardiovascular disease mortality, and all-cause mortality. The primary outcome was a composite outcome including cardiovascular disease events (coronary heart disease, stroke, and heart failure) and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were the separate assessment of cardiovascular disease events, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular disease mortality. We performed one-step (cohort-stratified Cox models) and two-step (random-effects models) meta-analyses adjusting for age, sex, smoking, systolic blood pressure, diabetes, and total cholesterol. The study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42017057576.

Findings

We identified 3935 studies, of which 53 cohorts fulfilled the inclusion criteria and 26 cohorts agreed to participate. We included IPD on 134 346 participants with a median age of 59 years (range 18–106) at baseline. There was a J-shaped association of FT₄ with the composite outcome and secondary outcomes, with the 20th (median 13·5 pmol/L [IQR 11·2–13·9]) to 40th percentiles (median 14·8 pmol/L [12·3–15·0]) conveying the lowest risk. Compared with the 20–40th percentiles, the age-adjusted and sex-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for FT₄ in the 80–100th percentiles was 1·20 (95% CI 1·11–1·31) for the composite outcome, 1·34 (1·20–1·49) for all-cause mortality, 1·57 (1·31–1·89) for cardiovascular disease mortality, and 1·22 (1·11–1·33) for cardiovascular disease events. In individuals aged 70 years and older, the 10-year absolute risk of composite outcome increased over 5% for women with FT₄ greater than the 85th percentile (median 17·6 pmol/L [IQR 15·0–18·3]), and men with FT₄ greater than the 75th percentile (16·7 pmol/L [14·0–17·4]). Non-linear associations were identified for TSH, with the 60th (median 1·90 mIU/L [IQR 1·68–2·25]) to 80th percentiles (2·90 mIU/L [2·41–3·32]) associated with the lowest risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality. Compared with the 60–80th percentiles, the age-adjusted and sex-adjusted HR of TSH in the 0–20th percentiles was 1·07 (95% CI 1·02–1·12) for the composite outcome, 1·09 (1·05–1·14) for all-cause mortality, and 1·07 (0·99–1·16) for cardiovascular disease mortality.

Interpretation

There was a J-shaped association of FT₄ with cardiovascular disease and mortality. Low concentrations of TSH were associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular disease mortality. The 20–40th percentiles of FT₄ and the 60–80th percentiles of TSH could represent the optimal healthy ranges of thyroid function based on the risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality, with more than 5% increase of 10-year composite risk identified for FT₄ greater than the 85th percentile in women and men older than 70 years. We propose a feasible approach to establish the optimal healthy ranges of thyroid function, allowing for better identification of individuals with a higher risk of thyroid-related outcomes.

Funding

None.