Authors reply: Time to initiation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation affects the patient survival prognosis

医学 体外膜肺氧合 心肺复苏术 体外心肺复苏 复苏 充氧 体外循环 重症监护医学 麻醉 心脏病学
作者
Sang-wook Lee,Ji‐Hoon Sim
出处
期刊:Journal of Internal Medicine [Wiley]
标识
DOI:10.1111/joim.20023
摘要

We appreciate the opportunity to respond to the three Letters to the Editor [1-3] commenting on our article [4], published in the Journal of Internal Medicine. We have carefully discussed them with the respective authors. We want to express our sincere gratitude for their interest in our work and for the valuable suggestions they have provided. First, we would like to address the concern raised in all three letters regarding the absence of clear exclusion criteria for comorbidities in our study group [4, 5]. We fully acknowledge and agree with the points raised by the authors of the letters. Although we share their concerns, our study was based on a retrospective data analysis. Consequently, we opted to address these effects by applying statistical corrections in a multivariate analysis rather than excluding them from our study altogether. We agree that in future prospective studies on this topic, it is indeed crucial to thoroughly consider and incorporate multiple factors that may influence patient outcomes into the exclusion criteria. Second, we would like to address their comments regarding the significant prehospital characteristics of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients highlighted in the study. We concur with the authors that there are numerous factors specific to OHCA patients, as opposed to in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) patients, that can influence outcomes [6]. Indeed, it may be more effective to analyse OHCA patients separately from IHCA patients to reach more definitive conclusions. OHCA patients often face more challenges that can delay extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) initiation, and in our data, these factors were associated with a poorer prognosis compared to IHCA patients. In future research, it would be advantageous to analyse OHCA patients separately from IHCA patients using a larger dataset to derive clearer insights on these issues. Third, we would like to comment on the issues raised by the authors regarding the specific details of post-cardiac arrest care. We agree that various post-cardiac arrest interventions—such as blood transfusions, ventilator settings, treatment of infectious complications, and therapeutic temperature management—as well as complications occurring during ECMO, such as insertion site bleeding, limb ischemia, and intracranial hemorrhage, are critical factors that impact the prognosis of cardiac arrest patients [7, 8]. Unfortunately, our study lacked sufficient data in this area to present detailed results. We recognize that detailed descriptions of these post-cardiac arrest treatments and complications may be crucial in understanding the prognosis of ECPR patients, and future studies should include these details and better assess their impact on outcomes. Finally, we would like to respond to the point raised by the authors regarding the insufficient evaluation of long-term outcomes beyond 6 months [6]. To include as many ECPR patients as possible in our study, we analysed data from patients who had recently undergone ECPR, resulting in a relatively short observation period of about 6 months. We agree that this short observation period may have limited our ability to assess long-term outcomes beyond 6 months. In future studies, we believe that it would be highly valuable to analyse patient outcomes over a longer follow-up period of 1 year or more. Despite the many limitations pointed out by the authors, we believe our study is significant in highlighting the importance of timely ECMO intervention in patients with cardiac arrest. We are confident that as more data on ECPR become available, higher quality analyses will help clarify some of the unknowns. Finally, we would like to express our deepest gratitude to the reviewers for their interest in our research and their valuable advice. Sang-Wook Lee: Writing—original draft; conceptualization; writing—review and editing; investigation. Ji-Hoon Sim: Writing—review and editing. The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
xyj6486发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
李BO完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
3秒前
SciGPT应助Xixicccccccc采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
heavenzzz发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
所所应助大反应釜采纳,获得10
4秒前
Orange应助吴所谓采纳,获得50
5秒前
5秒前
无知小白完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
moumou完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
李钧鹏完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
laber应助小诗人采纳,获得50
7秒前
有魅力的不评完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
麋鹿发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
9秒前
火星上含海完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
小马甲应助张雯思采纳,获得10
15秒前
41应助张雯思采纳,获得10
15秒前
李健的粉丝团团长应助123采纳,获得10
15秒前
孙燕应助张雯思采纳,获得10
15秒前
打打应助张雯思采纳,获得10
15秒前
情怀应助张雯思采纳,获得10
15秒前
孙燕应助张雯思采纳,获得10
15秒前
Hello应助张雯思采纳,获得10
15秒前
搜集达人应助张雯思采纳,获得10
15秒前
赘婿应助张雯思采纳,获得10
15秒前
今后应助张雯思采纳,获得10
15秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
麋鹿完成签到,获得积分20
16秒前
赵子完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
英姑应助会飞的鱼采纳,获得10
20秒前
23秒前
FashionBoy应助勤恳化蛹采纳,获得10
24秒前
26秒前
平淡小白菜完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
lzx发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
Jun发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
隐形曼青应助搞怪的紫易采纳,获得10
30秒前
高分求助中
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 12th edition 500
‘Unruly’ Children: Historical Fieldnotes and Learning Morality in a Taiwan Village (New Departures in Anthropology) 400
Indomethacinのヒトにおける経皮吸収 400
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 370
基于可调谐半导体激光吸收光谱技术泄漏气体检测系统的研究 350
Robot-supported joining of reinforcement textiles with one-sided sewing heads 320
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3989444
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3531531
关于积分的说明 11254250
捐赠科研通 3270191
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1804901
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 882105
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 809174