医学
米诺地尔
双盲
皮肤病科
等价(形式语言)
随机对照试验
传统医学
内科学
替代医学
病理
数学
纯数学
安慰剂
作者
Cheng Zhou,Weixin Fan,Jianfeng Zou,Jianglin Zhang,Hong Fang,Zhong‐Fa Lv,Dingquan Yang,Lai Wei,Xing‐Hua Gao,Qinping Yang,Aijun Chen,Jing Lou,Lili Zheng,Jianzhong Zhang
摘要
Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is a common cause of hair loss in adults. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of topical generic 5% new minoxidil foam (NMF) versus 5% minoxidil Rogaine ® foam in male patients with AGA. A randomized, double‐blind, controlled, phase III, equivalence trial in 10 centers in China between December 25, 2019, and June 28, 2021, was performed. In total, 417 men patients (≥18 years) with AGA were randomized to receive 5% NMF (211 patients) or 5% Rogaine ® foam (206 patients) 1 g two times daily for 24 weeks. The primary outcome was the changes in nonvellus target area hair counts (TAHC) from baseline to week 24. Equivalence was concluded if the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the treatment difference between the 5% NMF and Rogaine ® groups was within (−8.00, 8.00). After 24 weeks of treatment, the mean difference in the change of nonvellus TAHC between the 5% NMF group and the Rogaine ® group was −3.85 ± 1.62 hair/cm 2 in full‐analysis set (FAS) and −3.96 ± 1.68 hair/cm 2 in per‐protocol set (PPS), and the 95% CI of mean difference was (−7.03, −0.67) in FAS and (−7.26, −0.66) in PPS. No significant differences were found between the two groups in hair diameter, the ratio of terminal hair to vellus hair, the global photographic assessment by investigators, and adverse events (all P > 0.05). 5% NMF is as effective as Rogaine ® in increasing hair density and hair diameter in AGA patients and was found to be safe. This trial is registered with CTR20191708.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI