医学
乳腺摄影术
乳腺癌
乳腺癌筛查
优势比
癌症
妇科
癌症筛查
产科
肿瘤科
内科学
作者
Brian L. Sprague,Laura Ichikawa,Joanna Eavey,Kathryn P. Lowry,Garth H. Rauscher,Ellen S. O’Meara,Diana L. Miglioretti,Shuai Chen,Janie M. Lee,Natasha K. Stout,Jeanne S. Mandelblatt,Nila Alsheik,Sally D. Herschorn,Hannah Perry,Donald L. Weaver,Karla Kerlikowske
出处
期刊:Cancer
[Wiley]
日期:2023-06-12
卷期号:129 (16): 2456-2468
被引量:4
摘要
Abstract Background There are no consensus guidelines for supplemental breast cancer screening with whole‐breast ultrasound. However, criteria for women at high risk of mammography screening failures (interval invasive cancer or advanced cancer) have been identified. Mammography screening failure risk was evaluated among women undergoing supplemental ultrasound screening in clinical practice compared with women undergoing mammography alone. Methods A total of 38,166 screening ultrasounds and 825,360 screening mammograms without supplemental screening were identified during 2014–2020 within three Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC) registries. Risk of interval invasive cancer and advanced cancer were determined using BCSC prediction models. High interval invasive breast cancer risk was defined as heterogeneously dense breasts and BCSC 5‐year breast cancer risk ≥2.5% or extremely dense breasts and BCSC 5‐year breast cancer risk ≥1.67%. Intermediate/high advanced cancer risk was defined as BCSC 6‐year advanced breast cancer risk ≥0.38%. Results A total of 95.3% of 38,166 ultrasounds were among women with heterogeneously or extremely dense breasts, compared with 41.8% of 825,360 screening mammograms without supplemental screening ( p < .0001). Among women with dense breasts, high interval invasive breast cancer risk was prevalent in 23.7% of screening ultrasounds compared with 18.5% of screening mammograms without supplemental imaging (adjusted odds ratio, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.30–1.39); intermediate/high advanced cancer risk was prevalent in 32.0% of screening ultrasounds versus 30.5% of screening mammograms without supplemental screening (adjusted odds ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.89–0.94). Conclusions Ultrasound screening was highly targeted to women with dense breasts, but only a modest proportion were at high mammography screening failure risk. A clinically significant proportion of women undergoing mammography screening alone were at high mammography screening failure risk.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI