胸部理疗
医学
囊性纤维化
肺功能测试
生活质量(医疗保健)
气道
支气管扩张
物理疗法
重症监护医学
肺
内科学
麻醉
护理部
出处
期刊:The Cochrane library
[Elsevier]
日期:2023-05-05
卷期号:2023 (5): CD002011-CD002011
被引量:45
标识
DOI:10.1002/14651858.cd002011.pub3
摘要
We are uncertain whether CCPT has a more positive impact on respiratory function, respiratory exacerbations, individual preference, adherence, quality of life, exercise capacity and other outcomes when compared to alternative ACTs as the certainty of the evidence is very low. There was no advantage in respiratory function of CCPT over alternative ACTs, but this may reflect insufficient evidence rather than real equivalence. Narrative reports indicated that participants prefer self-administered ACTs. This review is limited by a paucity of well-designed, adequately powered, long-term studies. This review cannot yet recommend any single ACT above others; physiotherapists and people with CF may wish to try different ACTs until they find an ACT that suits them best.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI