Three-dimensional theoretical model for effectively describing the effect of craniomaxillofacial structural factors on loading situation in the temporomandibular joint

Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) overloading is considered a primary cause of temporomandibular joint disorders (TMD). Accordingly, craniomaxillofacial structural parameters affect the loading situation in the TMJ. However, no effective method exists for quantitatively measuring the loading variation in human TMJs. Clinical statistics, which draws from general rules from large amounts of clinical data, cannot entry for exploring the underlying biomechanical mechanism in craniomaxillofacial system. The finite element method (FEM) is an effective tool for analyze the stress and load on TMJs for several cases in a short period of time; however, it is difficult to generalize general patterns through calculations between different cases due to the different geometric characteristics and occlusal contacts between each case.(1) This study included 88 subjects with 176 unilateral data to measure angle (α) of the distance to the plane of occlusion. The bone destruction score was evaluated for clinical statistics. To rule out effects of the potential factors and ensure the generality of the study, one participant with no obvious bone destruction was selected as the standard case for establishing the three-dimensional (3D) theoretical model and FEM. (2) Three groups of forces, including biting, muscles and joint reaction forces on mandible, were adopted to establish a 3D theoretical model. (3) By modifying the sagittal α and coronal three types of deviation angle (φ) of the original model, nine candidate models were obtained for the FEM studies.(1) The static equilibrium equations, were used to establish a 3D theoretical model for describing the loading of the TMJ. The theoretical model was validated by monotonously modifying the structural parameter in comparison to two-dimensional theoretical models reported previously; (2) The force on the TMJ gradually decreased with α, and this trend was validated by both clinic statistics and FEM results; (3) The effects of the three types of deviation angle were different. The results of the case where only rotating biting forces were considered was consistent with clinical statistics, indicating that the side with lower α experiences higher TMJ load. (4) Changing the unilateral proportionality coefficients of biting and muscle force produced opposite effects, wherein the effects of the muscle force were stronger than those of the biting forces.A negative correlation was observed between the joint load and α. Among the three types of asymmetric deformities, occlusal deviations were the primary factors leading to TMD. Unilateral occlusion can result in a greater load on the ipsilateral joint and should be avoided when using the side corresponding to the TMD. This study provides a theoretical basis for the biomechanical mechanism of TMD and also enables the targeted mitigation and treatment of TMD through structural modification.