Does voluntary assisted dying impact quality palliative care? A retrospective mixed-method study

缓和医疗 自治 医学 焦虑 立法 护理部 家庭医学 心理学 精神科 政治学 法学
作者
Natasha Michael,David Albert Jones,Lucy Kernick,David W. Kissane
出处
期刊:BMJ supportive & palliative care [BMJ]
卷期号:: spcare-004946
标识
DOI:10.1136/spcare-2024-004946
摘要

Objectives We aimed to explore the relationship between the pursuit of voluntary assisted dying (VAD) and the delivery of quality palliative care in an Australian state where VAD was newly available Methods We adopted a retrospective convergent mixed-methods design to gather and interpret data from records of 141 patients who expressed an interest in and did or did not pursue VAD over 2 years. Findings were correlated against quality domains. Results The mean patient age was 72.4 years, with the majority male, married/partnered, with a cancer diagnosis and identifying with no religion. One-third had depression, anxiety or such symptoms, half were in the deteriorating phase, two-thirds required help with self-care and 83.7% reported moderate/severe symptoms. Patients sought VAD because of a desire for autonomy (68.1%), actual suffering (57.4%), fear of future suffering (51.1%) and social concerns (22.0%). VAD enquiries impacted multiple quality domains, both enhancing or impeding whole person care, family caregiving and the palliative care team. Open communication promoted adherence to therapeutic options and whole person care and allowed for timely access to palliative care. Patients sought VAD over palliative care as a solution to suffering, with the withholding of information impacting relationships. Significance of results As legislation is expanded across jurisdictions, palliative care is challenged to accompany patients on their chosen path. Studies are necessary to explore how to ensure the quality of palliative care remains enhanced in those who pursue VAD and support continues for caregivers and staff in their accompaniment of patients.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
teborlee发布了新的文献求助50
2秒前
奋斗的小王医生完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
宇文沛岚发布了新的文献求助20
2秒前
3秒前
桐桐应助dddu采纳,获得10
3秒前
Lucas应助scimaker采纳,获得10
3秒前
yy完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
薛硕关注了科研通微信公众号
4秒前
4秒前
xzy998发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
一直完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
tangxinhebaodan完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
哟呵发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
三片叶子1453完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
cccccjw完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
小时发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
9秒前
好嘞完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
dddddarkton发布了新的文献求助30
10秒前
诚心宛秋完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
空白格完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
蓝莓橘子酱应助zhang采纳,获得10
14秒前
111完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
小马甲应助踏实的盼秋采纳,获得10
15秒前
宇文沛岚完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
今后应助TheVivid采纳,获得20
16秒前
16秒前
白露完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
OLDBLOW完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
cbyyy发布了新的文献求助20
19秒前
桥墩墩完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
PLA完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
Hey完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
果汁橡皮糖完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
Jasper应助阳光铭媚采纳,获得10
21秒前
薛硕发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Modern Epidemiology, Fourth Edition 5000
Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, Ninth edition 5000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Weaponeering, Fourth Edition – Two Volume SET 2000
Social Cognition: Understanding People and Events 1000
Polymorphism and polytypism in crystals 1000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 冶金 遗传学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6029099
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7697622
关于积分的说明 16189004
捐赠科研通 5176274
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2770004
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1753368
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1639089