判别效度
克朗巴赫阿尔法
结构效度
收敛有效性
内容有效性
组内相关
表面有效性
临床心理学
物理疗法
医学
心理学
标准效度
可靠性(半导体)
心理测量学
内部一致性
功率(物理)
物理
量子力学
作者
Nazım Tolgahan Yıldız,Hikmet Kocaman,Hasan Bingöl
摘要
Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Oral Behavior Checklist (OBC‐TR). Materials and Methods The study included 223 patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) and 94 individuals without TMD. Face and content validity were analyzed. Structural (with confirmatory factor analysis [CFA]), convergent (with pain intensity, Fonseca Anamnestic Index [FAI], Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS], and Oral Health Impact Profile [OHIP‐14]), divergent (with active pain‐free maximum mouth opening [MMO]), and discriminant validity were investigated to evaluate the construct validity. Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for test–retest reliability were computed. Results Face and content validity were satisfactory. The CFA has verified the structural validity of the OBC‐TR. Strong associations between the OBC‐TR score and pain intensity ( r = 0.88), FAI ( r = 0.90), HADS ( r = 0.82–0.86), and OHIP‐14 ( r = 0.83) scores, and MMO ( r = −0.85) verified the convergent and divergent validity of the OBC‐TR. Concerning discriminant validity, the OBC‐TR discriminated between patients with TMD and individuals without TMD ( p < 0.05). Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.89) and test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.91) were satisfactory. Conclusion The OBC‐TR is a valid and reliable instrument to measure the frequency of oral parafunctional behaviors in Turkish‐speaking patients with TMD.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI