The association between objective and subjective socioeconomic status and subjective well-being: A meta-analytic review.

社会经济地位 荟萃分析 心理学 主观幸福感 联想(心理学) 幸福 幸福 医学 社会心理学 环境卫生 心理治疗师 人口 内科学
作者
Jacinth J. X. Tan,Michael W. Kraus,Nichelle C. Carpenter,Nancy E. Adler
出处
期刊:Psychological Bulletin [American Psychological Association]
卷期号:146 (11): 970-1020 被引量:426
标识
DOI:10.1037/bul0000258
摘要

This meta-analysis tested if the links between socioeconomic status (SES) and subjective well-being (SWB) differ by whether SES is assessed objectively or subjectively. The associations between measures of objective SES (i.e., income and educational attainment), subjective SES (i.e., the MacArthur ladder SES and perceived SES), and SWB (i.e., happiness and life satisfaction) were synthesized across 357 studies, totaling 2,352,095 participants. Overall, the objective SES and subjective SES measures were moderately associated (r = .32). The subjective SES-SWB association (r = .22) was larger than the objective SES-SWB association (r = .16). The income-SWB association (r = .23) was comparable with the ladder SES-SWB association (r = .22) but larger than the perceived SES-SWB association (r = .196). The education-SWB association (r = .12) was smaller than the associations with both measures of subjective SES. The subjective SES-SWB association was partially explained by common method variance. The subjective SES-SWB association, particularly with the ladder SES measure, also mediated the objective SES-SWB association. In moderation analyses, the objective SES-SWB associations strengthened as samples increased in wealth and population density. The subjective SES-SWB associations strengthened as samples increased in population density, decreased in income inequality, and decreased in relative social mobility. The role of common method variance, social comparisons, and other processes in explaining the SES-SWB links are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
领导范儿应助Mine采纳,获得10
刚刚
刚刚
Stride完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
十一发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
反向大笨钟完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
莲意峨眉峰完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
CC完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
传奇3应助叶叶叶叶采纳,获得10
2秒前
3秒前
英姑应助dsv采纳,获得10
3秒前
千寒完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
斯文败类应助zss采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
4秒前
Future发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
谁家那小谁完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助专注易绿采纳,获得10
5秒前
woyaojiayou完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
闹心发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
活泼的鼠标完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
fang完成签到,获得积分20
6秒前
6秒前
桐桐应助RO采纳,获得10
6秒前
傅宛白发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
五分之三完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
灵犀完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
虎咪咪完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
weiliu完成签到,获得积分20
9秒前
陈晨发布了新的文献求助100
9秒前
9秒前
懵懂的凝丹完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
高分求助中
Comprehensive Toxicology Fourth Edition 2026 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Target genes for RNAi in pest control: A comprehensive overview 600
The Social Work Ethics Casebook(2nd,Frederic G. R) 600
Master Curve-Auswertungen und Untersuchung des Größeneffekts für C(T)-Proben - aktuelle Erkenntnisse zur Untersuchung des Master Curve Konzepts für ferritisches Gusseisen mit Kugelgraphit bei dynamischer Beanspruchung (Projekt MCGUSS) 500
Design and Development of A CMOS Integrated Multimodal Sensor System with Carbon Nano-electrodes for Biosensor Applications 500
A novel angiographic index for predicting the efficacy of drug-coated balloons in small vessels 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 内科学 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 纳米技术 遗传学 基因 复合材料 化学工程 物理化学 病理 催化作用 免疫学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5107908
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4317082
关于积分的说明 13449534
捐赠科研通 4146329
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2272097
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1274455
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1212408