The association between objective and subjective socioeconomic status and subjective well-being: A meta-analytic review.

社会经济地位 荟萃分析 心理学 主观幸福感 联想(心理学) 幸福 幸福 医学 社会心理学 环境卫生 心理治疗师 人口 内科学
作者
Jacinth J. X. Tan,Michael W. Kraus,Nichelle C. Carpenter,Nancy E. Adler
出处
期刊:Psychological Bulletin [American Psychological Association]
卷期号:146 (11): 970-1020 被引量:426
标识
DOI:10.1037/bul0000258
摘要

This meta-analysis tested if the links between socioeconomic status (SES) and subjective well-being (SWB) differ by whether SES is assessed objectively or subjectively. The associations between measures of objective SES (i.e., income and educational attainment), subjective SES (i.e., the MacArthur ladder SES and perceived SES), and SWB (i.e., happiness and life satisfaction) were synthesized across 357 studies, totaling 2,352,095 participants. Overall, the objective SES and subjective SES measures were moderately associated (r = .32). The subjective SES-SWB association (r = .22) was larger than the objective SES-SWB association (r = .16). The income-SWB association (r = .23) was comparable with the ladder SES-SWB association (r = .22) but larger than the perceived SES-SWB association (r = .196). The education-SWB association (r = .12) was smaller than the associations with both measures of subjective SES. The subjective SES-SWB association was partially explained by common method variance. The subjective SES-SWB association, particularly with the ladder SES measure, also mediated the objective SES-SWB association. In moderation analyses, the objective SES-SWB associations strengthened as samples increased in wealth and population density. The subjective SES-SWB associations strengthened as samples increased in population density, decreased in income inequality, and decreased in relative social mobility. The role of common method variance, social comparisons, and other processes in explaining the SES-SWB links are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
ningjianing完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
melo完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
waitingfor完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
momo发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
ash发布了新的文献求助30
1秒前
英俊的铭应助大气的书包采纳,获得10
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
bkagyin应助爬不起来采纳,获得10
2秒前
贾珂盈发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
MING发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
明理完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
善学以致用应助呼啸37126采纳,获得10
3秒前
SciGPT应助90采纳,获得10
3秒前
4秒前
李爱国应助乔妍采纳,获得10
4秒前
风飞发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
5秒前
小马甲应助胡n采纳,获得10
5秒前
chi发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
香蕉八宝粥完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
柚子与桃发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
玲子7完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
冯a发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
无情白羊发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
十二发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
xiaoyao完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
科研通AI6应助宝乐日玛采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
汉堡包应助lzn666采纳,获得10
9秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助ye采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
aich完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Fermented Coffee Market 2000
PARLOC2001: The update of loss containment data for offshore pipelines 500
Critical Thinking: Tools for Taking Charge of Your Learning and Your Life 4th Edition 500
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 500
A Manual for the Identification of Plant Seeds and Fruits : Second revised edition 500
Vertebrate Palaeontology, 5th Edition 340
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 内科学 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 纳米技术 遗传学 基因 复合材料 化学工程 物理化学 病理 催化作用 免疫学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5257965
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4419974
关于积分的说明 13758480
捐赠科研通 4293444
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2355931
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1352389
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1313159