医学
逻辑回归
支持向量机
随机森林
人工神经网络
睡眠呼吸暂停
机器学习
内科学
接收机工作特性
人工智能
计算机科学
作者
Steven Holfinger,M. Melanie Lyons,Brendan T Keenan,Diego R. Mazzotti,Jesse Mindel,Greg Maislin,Peter A. Cistulli,Kate Sutherland,Nigel McArdle,Bhajan Singh,Ning‐Hung Chen,Þórarinn Gíslason,Thomas Penzel,Fang Han,Qing Yun Li,Richard J. Schwab,Allan I Pack,Ulysses J. Magalang
出处
期刊:Chest
[Elsevier]
日期:2022-03-01
卷期号:161 (3): 807-817
被引量:15
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2021.10.023
摘要
Prediction tools without patient-reported symptoms could facilitate widespread identification of OSA.What is the diagnostic performance of OSA prediction tools derived from machine learning using readily available data without patient responses to questionnaires? Also, how do they compare with STOP-BANG, an OSA prediction tool, in clinical and community-based samples?Logistic regression and machine learning techniques, including artificial neural network (ANN), random forests (RF), and kernel support vector machine, were used to determine the ability of age, sex, BMI, and race to predict OSA status. A retrospective cohort of 17,448 subjects from sleep clinics within the international Sleep Apnea Global Interdisciplinary Consortium (SAGIC) were randomly split into training (n = 10,469) and validation (n = 6,979) sets. Model comparisons were performed by using the area under the receiver-operating curve (AUC). Trained models were compared with the STOP-BANG questionnaire in two prospective testing datasets: an independent clinic-based sample from SAGIC (n = 1,613) and a community-based sample from the Sleep Heart Health Study (n = 5,599).The AUCs (95% CI) of the machine learning models were significantly higher than logistic regression (0.61 [0.60-0.62]) in both the training and validation datasets (ANN, 0.68 [0.66-0.69]; RF, 0.68 [0.67-0.70]; and kernel support vector machine, 0.66 [0.65-0.67]). In the SAGIC testing sample, the ANN (0.70 [0.68-0.72]) and RF (0.70 [0.68-0.73]) models had AUCs similar to those of the STOP-BANG (0.71 [0.68-0.72]). In the Sleep Heart Health Study testing sample, the ANN (0.72 [0.71-0.74]) had AUCs similar to those of STOP-BANG (0.72 [0.70-0.73]).OSA prediction tools using machine learning without patient-reported symptoms provide better diagnostic performance than logistic regression. In clinical and community-based samples, the symptomless ANN tool has diagnostic performance similar to that of a widely used prediction tool that includes patient symptoms. Machine learning-derived algorithms may have utility for widespread identification of OSA.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI