Methodological guidance for the conduct of mixed methods systematic reviews

系统回顾 多元方法论 管理科学 最佳实践 循证实践 医学 计算机科学 心理学 梅德林 政治学 工程类 替代医学 教育学 病理 法学
作者
Cindy Stern,Lucylynn Lizarondo,Judith Carrier,Christina Godfrey,Kendra L. Rieger,Susan Salmond,João Apóstolo,Pamela Kirkpatrick,Heather Loveday
出处
期刊:JBI evidence implementation 卷期号:19 (2): 120-129 被引量:98
标识
DOI:10.1097/xeb.0000000000000282
摘要

The objective of this paper is to outline the updated methodological approach for conducting a JBI mixed methods systematic review with a focus on data synthesis, specifically, methods related to how data are combined and the overall integration of the quantitative and qualitative evidence.Mixed methods systematic reviews provide a more complete basis for complex decision-making than that currently offered by single method reviews, thereby maximizing their usefulness to clinical and policy decision-makers. Although mixed methods systematic reviews are gaining traction, guidance regarding the methodology of combining quantitative and qualitative data is limited. In 2014, the JBI Mixed Methods Review Methodology Group developed guidance for mixed methods systematic reviews; however, since the introduction of this guidance, there have been significant developments in mixed methods synthesis. As such, the methodology group recognized the need to revise the guidance to align it with the current state of knowledge on evidence synthesis methodology.Between 2015 and 2019, the JBI Mixed Methods Review Methodology Group undertook an extensive review of the literature, held annual face-to-face meetings (which were supplemented by teleconferences and regular email correspondence), sought advice from experts in the field, and presented at scientific conferences. This process led to the development of guidance in the form of a chapter in the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis, the official guidance for conducting JBI systematic reviews. In 2019, the guidance was ratified by the JBI International Scientific Committee.The updated JBI methodological guidance for conducting a mixed methods systematic review recommends that reviewers take a convergent approach to synthesis and integration whereby the specific method utilized is dependent on the nature/type of questions that are posed in the systematic review. The JBI guidance is primarily based on Hong et al. and Sandelowski's typology on mixed methods systematic reviews. If the review question can be addressed by both quantitative and qualitative research designs, the convergent integrated approach should be followed, which involves data transformation and allows reviewers to combine quantitative and qualitative data. If the focus of the review is on different aspects or dimensions of a particular phenomenon of interest, the convergent segregated approach is undertaken, which involves independent synthesis of quantitative and qualitative data leading to the generation of quantitative and qualitative evidence, which are then integrated together.The updated guidance on JBI mixed methods systematic reviews provides foundational work to a rapidly evolving methodology and aligns with other seminal work undertaken in the field of mixed methods synthesis. Limitations to the current guidance are acknowledged, and a series of methodological projects identified by the JBI Mixed Methods Review Methodology Group to further refine the methodology are proposed. Mixed methods reviews offer an innovative framework for generating unique insights related to the complexities associated with health care quality and safety.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Microgan完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
fhw完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
Zhangfu完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
科研小郭完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
guo完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
Ying完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
小时不识月完成签到 ,获得积分10
34秒前
彭苗苗完成签到 ,获得积分10
34秒前
37秒前
笨笨的荧荧完成签到 ,获得积分10
41秒前
yi完成签到 ,获得积分10
48秒前
nt1119完成签到 ,获得积分10
56秒前
Hollow完成签到,获得积分10
56秒前
困困困完成签到 ,获得积分10
57秒前
孟寐以求完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
luffy完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
kiwi完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
was_3完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
leo完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
希望天下0贩的0应助Jim luo采纳,获得10
1分钟前
一针超人完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
MoodMeed完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
喏晨完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
Jim luo发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
霓娜酱完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
壮观傲霜完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
要笑cc完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
全智甜完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
宣宣宣0733完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
胡质斌完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
范白容完成签到 ,获得积分0
1分钟前
金007完成签到 ,获得积分20
1分钟前
Tinyel完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
小于完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
认真的珠完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
科研通AI2S应助认真的珠采纳,获得10
2分钟前
高分求助中
Licensing Deals in Pharmaceuticals 2019-2024 3000
Effect of reactor temperature on FCC yield 2000
Very-high-order BVD Schemes Using β-variable THINC Method 1020
PraxisRatgeber: Mantiden: Faszinierende Lauerjäger 800
Mission to Mao: Us Intelligence and the Chinese Communists in World War II 600
MATLAB在传热学例题中的应用 500
Geochemistry, 2nd Edition 地球化学经典教科书第二版,不要epub版本 431
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3303307
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2937611
关于积分的说明 8482699
捐赠科研通 2611556
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1426036
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 662524
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 647023