Prostate cancer screening using a combination of risk-prediction, MRI, and targeted prostate biopsies (STHLM3-MRI): a prospective, population-based, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial

医学 前列腺癌 前列腺 人口 前列腺活检 前列腺癌筛查 活检 禁忌症 前列腺特异性抗原 前瞻性队列研究 肿瘤科 癌症 内科学 随机对照试验 妇科 病理 替代医学 环境卫生
作者
Tobias Nordström,Andrea Discacciati,Martin Bergman,Mark Clements,Markus Aly,Magnus Annerstedt,Axel Glaessgen,Stefan Carlsson,Fredrik Jäderling,Martin Eklund,Henrik Grönberg,Carin Cavalli-Björkman,Astrid Björklund,Britt-Marie Hune,Mark Clements,Shuang Hao,Andrea Discacciati,Henrik Grönberg,Martin Eklund,Tobias Nordström
出处
期刊:Lancet Oncology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:22 (9): 1240-1249 被引量:150
标识
DOI:10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00348-x
摘要

Screening for prostate cancer using prostate-specific antigen (PSA) reduces prostate cancer mortality but can lead to adverse outcomes. We aimed to compare a traditional screening approach with a diagnostic strategy of blood-based risk prediction combined with MRI-targeted biopsies.We did a prospective, population-based, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial (STHLM3-MRI) in Stockholm county, Sweden. Men aged 50-74 years were randomly selected by Statistics Sweden and invited by mail to participate in screening; those with an elevated risk of prostate cancer, defined as either a PSA of 3 ng/mL or higher or a Stockholm3 score of 0·11 or higher were eligible for randomisation. Men with a previous prostate cancer diagnosis, who had undergone a prostate biopsy within 60 days before the invitation to participate, with a contraindication for MRI, or with severe illness were excluded. Eligible participants were randomly assigned (2:3) using computer-generated blocks of five, stratified by clinically significant prostate cancer risk, to receive either systematic prostate biopsies (standard group) or biparametric MRI followed by MRI-targeted and systematic biopsy in MRI-positive participants (experimental group). The primary outcome was the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer at prostate biopsy, defined as a Gleason score of 3 + 4 or higher. We used a margin of 0·78 to assess non-inferiority for the primary outcome. Key secondary outcome measures included the proportion of men with clinically insignificant prostate cancer (defined as a Gleason score of 3 + 3), and the number of any prostate MRI and biopsy procedures done. We did two comparisons: Stockholm3 (using scores of 0·11 and 0·15 as cutoffs) versus PSA in the experimental group (paired analyses) and PSA plus standard biopsy versus Stockholm3 plus MRI-targeted and systematic biopsy (unpaired, randomised analyses). All analyses were intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03377881.Between Feb 5, 2018, and March 4, 2020, 49 118 men were invited to participate, of whom 12 750 were enrolled and provided blood specimens, and 2293 with elevated risk were randomly assigned to the experimental group (n=1372) or the standard group (n=921). The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer was 0·76 (95% CI 0·72-0·80) for Stockholm3 and 0·60 (0·54-0·65) for PSA. In the experimental group, a Stockholm3 of 0·11 or higher was non-inferior to a PSA of 3 ng/mL or higher for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (227 vs 192; relative proportion [RP] 1·18 [95% CI 1·09-1·28], p<0·0001 for non-inferiority), and also detected a similar number of low-grade prostate cancers (50 vs 41; 1·22 [0·96-1·55], p=0·053 for superiority) and was associated with more MRIs and biopsies. Compared with PSA of 3 ng/mL or higher, a Stockholm3 of 0·15 or higher provided identical sensitivity to detect clinically significant cancer, and led to fewer MRI procedures (545 vs 846; 0·64 [0·55-0·82]) and fewer biopsy procedures (311 vs 338; 0·92 (0·86-1·03). Compared with screening using PSA and systematic biopsies, a Stockholm3 of 0·11 or higher combined with MRI-targeted and systematic biopsies was associated with higher detection of clinically significant cancers (227 [3·0%] men tested vs 106 [2·1%] men tested; RP 1·44 [95% CI 1·15-1·81]), lower detection of low-grade cancers (50 [0·7%] vs 73 [1·4%]; 0·46 [0·32-0·66]), and led to fewer biopsy procedures. Patients randomly assigned to the experimental group had a lower incidence of prescription of antibiotics for infection (25 [1·8%] of 1372 vs 41 [4·4%] of 921; p=0·0002) and a lower incidence of admission to hospital (16 [1·2%] vs 31 [3·4%]; p=0·0003) than those in the standard group.The Stockholm3 test can inform risk stratification before MRI and targeted biopsies in prostate cancer screening. Combining the Stockholm3 test with an MRI-targeted biopsy approach for prostate cancer screening decreases overdetection while maintaining the ability to detect clinically significant cancer.The Swedish Cancer Society, the Swedish Research Council, and Stockholm City Council.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Akim应助YHDing采纳,获得10
刚刚
策策发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
biubiu完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
非234完成签到,获得积分20
刚刚
酷炫甜瓜发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
muyixiao完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
赘婿应助wisliudj采纳,获得10
3秒前
xf应助犹豫觅露采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
Llawite发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
酷波er应助那都通采纳,获得10
8秒前
fgfghijn完成签到,获得积分20
9秒前
9秒前
equalone完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
健忘白易应助白子双采纳,获得10
9秒前
策策完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
10秒前
苏苏完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
paws发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
结实烧鹅发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
12秒前
哈哈完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
14秒前
taoduan2800发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
威威发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
15秒前
YHDing发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
Dr_Sean发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
17秒前
17秒前
阿泽完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
解放军总医院眼科医学部病例精解 1000
温州医科大学附属眼视光医院斜弱视与双眼视病例精解 1000
Zur lokalen Geoidbestimmung aus terrestrischen Messungen vertikaler Schweregradienten 1000
translating meaning 500
Storie e culture della televisione 500
Selected research on camelid physiology and nutrition 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 内科学 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 纳米技术 遗传学 基因 复合材料 化学工程 物理化学 病理 催化作用 免疫学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4896145
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4177840
关于积分的说明 12969394
捐赠科研通 3941069
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2162084
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1180518
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1086076