亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

The Comprehensive Complication Index

医学 随机对照试验 临床终点 样本量测定 并发症 外科 代理终结点 内科学 数学 统计
作者
Ksenija Slankamenac,Nina Nederlof,Patrick Pessaux,Jeroen de Jonge,Bas P. L. Wijnhoven,Stefan Breitenstein,Christian E. Oberkofler,Rolf Graf,Milo A. Puhan,Pierre-Alain Clavien
出处
期刊:Annals of Surgery [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:260 (5): 757-763 被引量:308
标识
DOI:10.1097/sla.0000000000000948
摘要

In Brief Objective: To test whether the newly developed comprehensive complication index (CCI) is more sensitive than traditional endpoints for detecting between-group differences in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Background: A major challenge in RCTs is the choice of optimal endpoints to detect treatment effects. Mortality is no longer a sufficient marker in studies, and morbidity is often poorly defined. The CCI, integrating all complications including their severity in a linear scale ranging from 0 (no complication) to 100 (death), is a new tool, which may be more sensitive than other traditional endpoints to detect treatment effects on postoperative morbidity. Methods: The CCI was tested in 3 published RCTs from European centers evaluating pancreas, esophageal and colon resections. To compare the sensitivity of the CCI with traditional morbidity endpoints, for example, presence of any (yes/no) or only the most severe complications, all postoperative events were assessed, and the CCI calculated. Treatment effects and sample size calculations were compared using the CCI and traditional endpoints. Results: Although RCTs failed to show between-group differences using any or most severe complications, the CCI revealed significant differences between treatment groups in 2 RCTs—after pancreas (P = 0.009) and esophageal surgery (P = 0.014). The CCI in the RCT on colon resections confirmed the absence of between-group differences (P = 0.39). The required sample sizes in trials are up to 9 times lower for the CCI than for traditional morbidity endpoints. Conclusions: This study demonstrates superiority of the CCI to traditional endpoints. The CCI may serve as an appealing endpoint for future RCTs and may reduce the sample size. This study demonstrates superiority of the new comprehensive complication index (CCI) over traditional endpoints in detecting between-group differences in randomized control trials. The CCI may therefore serve as preferred endpoint in future RCTs and may help in designing RCTs with smaller sample sizes.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
HFH给Brian的求助进行了留言
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
6秒前
酷波er应助平淡的河马采纳,获得10
6秒前
8秒前
霸气明雪发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
9秒前
奋斗邑完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
英俊的铭应助顺利的皮皮采纳,获得10
15秒前
潇洒的惋清应助Rita采纳,获得10
16秒前
16秒前
19秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
20秒前
20秒前
脑洞疼应助zLin采纳,获得10
20秒前
22秒前
26秒前
小白完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
29秒前
30秒前
学海无涯苦作舟完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
32秒前
33秒前
zLin发布了新的文献求助10
36秒前
舒心糖豆发布了新的文献求助10
38秒前
38秒前
省级中药饮片完成签到 ,获得积分10
39秒前
43秒前
44秒前
Percy完成签到 ,获得积分10
46秒前
科研通AI2S应助诚心的大侠采纳,获得10
48秒前
调皮的代双完成签到 ,获得积分10
51秒前
54秒前
拉长的迎曼完成签到 ,获得积分10
55秒前
努力搞科研完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
QingCress77完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
活力金毛发布了新的文献求助30
1分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The Graphene Handbook (2019 Edition) 800
Adhesion Science: Principles & Practice 800
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
IEST-RP-CC018: Cleanroom Cleaning and Sanitization: Operating and Monitoring Procedures 600
Fundamentals of Pharmaceutical and Biologics Regulations: A Global Perspective, Second Edition 600
久松真一著作集〈第5巻〉禅と芸術 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6534557
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8327828
关于积分的说明 17839546
捐赠科研通 5636148
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2934380
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1910712
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1769161