The Comprehensive Complication Index

医学 随机对照试验 临床终点 样本量测定 并发症 外科 代理终结点 内科学 数学 统计
作者
Ksenija Slankamenac,Nina Nederlof,Patrick Pessaux,Jeroen de Jonge,Bas P. L. Wijnhoven,Stefan Breitenstein,Christian E. Oberkofler,Rolf Graf,Milo A. Puhan,Pierre-Alain Clavien
出处
期刊:Annals of Surgery [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:260 (5): 757-763 被引量:308
标识
DOI:10.1097/sla.0000000000000948
摘要

In Brief Objective: To test whether the newly developed comprehensive complication index (CCI) is more sensitive than traditional endpoints for detecting between-group differences in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Background: A major challenge in RCTs is the choice of optimal endpoints to detect treatment effects. Mortality is no longer a sufficient marker in studies, and morbidity is often poorly defined. The CCI, integrating all complications including their severity in a linear scale ranging from 0 (no complication) to 100 (death), is a new tool, which may be more sensitive than other traditional endpoints to detect treatment effects on postoperative morbidity. Methods: The CCI was tested in 3 published RCTs from European centers evaluating pancreas, esophageal and colon resections. To compare the sensitivity of the CCI with traditional morbidity endpoints, for example, presence of any (yes/no) or only the most severe complications, all postoperative events were assessed, and the CCI calculated. Treatment effects and sample size calculations were compared using the CCI and traditional endpoints. Results: Although RCTs failed to show between-group differences using any or most severe complications, the CCI revealed significant differences between treatment groups in 2 RCTs—after pancreas (P = 0.009) and esophageal surgery (P = 0.014). The CCI in the RCT on colon resections confirmed the absence of between-group differences (P = 0.39). The required sample sizes in trials are up to 9 times lower for the CCI than for traditional morbidity endpoints. Conclusions: This study demonstrates superiority of the CCI to traditional endpoints. The CCI may serve as an appealing endpoint for future RCTs and may reduce the sample size. This study demonstrates superiority of the new comprehensive complication index (CCI) over traditional endpoints in detecting between-group differences in randomized control trials. The CCI may therefore serve as preferred endpoint in future RCTs and may help in designing RCTs with smaller sample sizes.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
嘻嘻哈哈应助单剑VV采纳,获得10
刚刚
paggyfight发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
1秒前
包被坏蛋发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
小王梓发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
好好完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
ake完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
jackie发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
情怀应助张正采纳,获得10
6秒前
TRY发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
找文献完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
zbh发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
大个应助jackie采纳,获得10
8秒前
likewater发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
科研通AI6.3应助李悟尔采纳,获得10
9秒前
pluvia完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
yeyan发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
10秒前
11秒前
明捷完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
你好你好完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
HuWanting完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
科研通AI6.4应助鲤鱼听荷采纳,获得10
16秒前
顾君逸发布了新的文献求助50
16秒前
16秒前
bkagyin应助天天开心亞采纳,获得10
16秒前
悦耳忆曼完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
17秒前
18秒前
jackie完成签到,获得积分20
18秒前
Starwalker应助医路前行采纳,获得10
19秒前
小毛发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
22秒前
22秒前
李悟尔发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
云鹿发布了新的文献求助40
22秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Cronologia da história de Macau 5000
Braunwald’s Heart Disease, 2 Vol Set A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine 13th Edition 1000
Petrology and Plate Tectonics 800
Prompt Engineering for Clinicians: Harnessing AI in Everyday Medical Practice 600
Electrode Potentials 550
Handbook Of Synthetic Methodologies And Protocols Of Nanomaterials 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6997214
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8673101
关于积分的说明 18390640
捐赠科研通 6471617
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3099257
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2162477
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2075658