The Comprehensive Complication Index

医学 随机对照试验 临床终点 样本量测定 并发症 外科 代理终结点 内科学 数学 统计
作者
Ksenija Slankamenac,Nina Nederlof,Patrick Pessaux,Jeroen de Jonge,Bas P. L. Wijnhoven,Stefan Breitenstein,Christian E. Oberkofler,Rolf Graf,Milo A. Puhan,Pierre-Alain Clavien
出处
期刊:Annals of Surgery [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:260 (5): 757-763 被引量:308
标识
DOI:10.1097/sla.0000000000000948
摘要

In Brief Objective: To test whether the newly developed comprehensive complication index (CCI) is more sensitive than traditional endpoints for detecting between-group differences in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Background: A major challenge in RCTs is the choice of optimal endpoints to detect treatment effects. Mortality is no longer a sufficient marker in studies, and morbidity is often poorly defined. The CCI, integrating all complications including their severity in a linear scale ranging from 0 (no complication) to 100 (death), is a new tool, which may be more sensitive than other traditional endpoints to detect treatment effects on postoperative morbidity. Methods: The CCI was tested in 3 published RCTs from European centers evaluating pancreas, esophageal and colon resections. To compare the sensitivity of the CCI with traditional morbidity endpoints, for example, presence of any (yes/no) or only the most severe complications, all postoperative events were assessed, and the CCI calculated. Treatment effects and sample size calculations were compared using the CCI and traditional endpoints. Results: Although RCTs failed to show between-group differences using any or most severe complications, the CCI revealed significant differences between treatment groups in 2 RCTs—after pancreas (P = 0.009) and esophageal surgery (P = 0.014). The CCI in the RCT on colon resections confirmed the absence of between-group differences (P = 0.39). The required sample sizes in trials are up to 9 times lower for the CCI than for traditional morbidity endpoints. Conclusions: This study demonstrates superiority of the CCI to traditional endpoints. The CCI may serve as an appealing endpoint for future RCTs and may reduce the sample size. This study demonstrates superiority of the new comprehensive complication index (CCI) over traditional endpoints in detecting between-group differences in randomized control trials. The CCI may therefore serve as preferred endpoint in future RCTs and may help in designing RCTs with smaller sample sizes.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
是R同学哦关注了科研通微信公众号
刚刚
传奇3应助小小采纳,获得10
刚刚
xy发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
1秒前
飘逸蜡烛发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
无极微光应助zj采纳,获得20
1秒前
大大完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
无花果应助忐忑的远山采纳,获得10
2秒前
大圣发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
嘿哈发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
叶破茧完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
小y的芋圆丸子完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
达不溜完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
Akim应助Yff采纳,获得10
3秒前
无糖零脂完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
张文康完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
蓬蓬完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
bkagyin应助大海采纳,获得10
3秒前
yhbk完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
11发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
Owen应助成就的德地采纳,获得10
5秒前
锦心发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
慕青应助蓉城采纳,获得10
5秒前
hsw发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
充电宝应助sfsghjy采纳,获得10
5秒前
科研通AI6.1应助牛角包采纳,获得10
5秒前
高兴的羊完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
威武寒珊完成签到,获得积分20
6秒前
星辰大海应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
cdercder应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
GraveDiggaz完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
於傲松发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
young发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
高分求助中
Ideology and Meaning-Making under the Putin Regime 750
Introduction to Industrial/Organizational Psychology 600
Prompt Engineering for Clinicians: Harnessing AI in Everyday Medical Practice 600
Handbook of Luminescence Dating 500
Safety Pharmacology 500
《KNN基无铅压电陶瓷电学性能优化与物理机理研究》 500
Isomerism In Coordination Compounds 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 计算机科学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 遗传学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6934438
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8621494
关于积分的说明 18286119
捐赠科研通 6361168
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3074890
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2112110
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2052383