Barriers to Care Among American Indians in Public Health Care Programs

医疗保健 医学 逻辑回归 卫生公平 家庭医学 民族 非洲裔美国人 老年学 公共卫生 护理部 政治学 民族学 内科学 法学 历史
作者
Kathleen Thiede Call,Donna McAlpine,Pamela Jo Johnson,Timothy J. Beebe,James A. McRae,Xue Song
出处
期刊:Medical Care [Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
卷期号:44 (6): 595-600 被引量:132
标识
DOI:10.1097/01.mlr.0000215901.37144.94
摘要

Objective: We sought to examine the extent to which reported barriers to health care services differ between American Indians (AIs) and non-Hispanic Whites (Whites). Methods: A statewide stratified random sample of Minnesota health care program enrollees was surveyed. Responses from AI and White adult enrollees (n = 1281) and parents of child enrollees (n = 572) were analyzed using logistic regression models that account for the complex sample design. Barriers examined include: financial, access, and cultural barriers, confidence/trust in providers, and discrimination. Results: Both AIs and Whites report barriers to health care access. However, a greater proportion of AIs report barriers in most categories. Among adults, AIs are more likely to report racial discrimination, cultural misunderstandings, family/work responsibilities, and transportation difficulties, whereas Whites are more likely to report being unable to see their preferred doctor. A higher proportion of adult enrollees compared with parents of child enrollees report barriers in most categories; however, differences between parents of AIs and White children are more substantial. In addition to racial discrimination and cultural misunderstandings, parents of AI children are more likely than parents of White enrollees to report limited clinic hours, lack of respect for religious beliefs, and mistrust of their child's provider as barriers. Conclusions: Although individuals have enrolled in health care programs and have access to care, barriers to using these services remain. Significant differences between AIs and Whites involve issues of trust, respect, and discrimination. Providers must address barriers experienced by AIs to improve accessibility, acceptability, and quality of care for AI health care consumers.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
於茗发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
三生万物完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
小飞七应助jy采纳,获得10
3秒前
Chance发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
秀丽的香旋完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
小糯发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
强强发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
研友_r8YEP8完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
汉堡包应助跳跃的梦凡采纳,获得10
8秒前
ll应助在远方采纳,获得10
9秒前
儒雅的狼完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
仁者发布了新的文献求助30
10秒前
11秒前
liang405发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
研友_r8YEP8发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
zhuj11应助研友_nEoEy8采纳,获得10
14秒前
15秒前
YS完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
罗浩禹发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
英姑应助xyqy采纳,获得10
19秒前
20秒前
如意发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
gcc应助逃亡的小狗采纳,获得10
23秒前
23秒前
南方周末完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
26秒前
巧克力素完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
KevenDing完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
yq发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
简一发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
一个发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
30秒前
畅快的静芙完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
智者完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
愫浅完成签到 ,获得积分10
31秒前
深情安青应助SDS采纳,获得10
32秒前
高分求助中
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 3000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Mechanistic Modeling of Gas-Liquid Two-Phase Flow in Pipes 2500
Kelsen’s Legacy: Legal Normativity, International Law and Democracy 1000
Conference Record, IAS Annual Meeting 1977 610
Interest Rate Modeling. Volume 3: Products and Risk Management 600
Interest Rate Modeling. Volume 2: Term Structure Models 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 量子力学 光电子学 冶金
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3543968
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3121180
关于积分的说明 9345951
捐赠科研通 2819266
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1550071
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 722375
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 713169