Are all antidepressants the same? The consumer has a point

文拉法辛 舍曲林 安非他酮 西酞普兰 米氮平 心理学 5-羟色胺能 精神科 氟西汀 依西酞普兰 帕罗西汀 易怒 临床心理学 医学
作者
Sebastian Camino,Sergio Strejilevich,Antonella Godoy,Jose Smith,Alejandro Szmulewicz
出处
期刊:Psychological Medicine [Cambridge University Press]
卷期号:: 1-8
标识
DOI:10.1017/s0033291722000678
摘要

Abstract Background Although a large variety of antidepressants agents (AD) with different mechanisms of action are available, no significant differences in efficacy and safety have been shown. However, there have been few attempts to incorporate data on subjective experiences under different AD. Method We conducted a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the posts from the website www.askapatient.com from different AD. We reviewed a random sample of 1000 posts. Result After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, we included a final sample of 450 posts, 50 on each of the most used AD: sertraline, citalopram, paroxetine, escitalopram, fluoxetine, venlafaxine, duloxetine, mirtazapine, and bupropion. Bupropion, citalopram, and venlafaxine had the higher overall satisfaction ratings. Sertraline, paroxetine, and fluoxetine had high reports of emotional blunting, while bupropion very few. Overall satisfaction with AD treatment was inversely associated with the presence of the following side-effects: suicidality, irritability, emotional blunting, cognitive disturbances, and withdrawal symptoms. After adjusting for confounders, only emotional blunting was shown to be more frequently reported by users of serotonergic agents, as compared to non-serotoninergic agents. Conclusion This research points out that the subjective experience of patients under treatment should be taken into consideration when selecting an AD as differences between agents were evident. In contrast to the more frequent treatment decisions, users might prefer receiving a non-serotoninergic agent over a serotonergic one due to their lower propensity to produce emotional blunting.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
喜悦的水云完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
S欣完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
么一嗷喵完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
ZhouKL发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
abc123完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
暴躁的小懒猪完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
bluehand完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
清爽的冰凡完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
七七四十九完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
勤奋流沙完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
简单的尔风完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
12秒前
12秒前
科研通AI2S应助ZhouKL采纳,获得10
12秒前
14秒前
14秒前
称心冬云发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
坦率的惊蛰完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
zcg完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
11完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
20秒前
lefora完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
长欢发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
BOLIN完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
Anonymous完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
风趣谷秋完成签到,获得积分20
27秒前
maxyer完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
wisdom完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
29秒前
睡到人间煮饭时完成签到 ,获得积分10
29秒前
YJ完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
所所应助长欢采纳,获得30
30秒前
mkljl完成签到 ,获得积分10
31秒前
拓跋傲薇完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
32秒前
tuo zhang完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
liguanyu1078完成签到,获得积分10
33秒前
妍yan完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
高分求助中
Rechtsphilosophie 1000
Bayesian Models of Cognition:Reverse Engineering the Mind 800
Essentials of thematic analysis 700
A Dissection Guide & Atlas to the Rabbit 600
Very-high-order BVD Schemes Using β-variable THINC Method 568
Внешняя политика КНР: о сущности внешнеполитического курса современного китайского руководства 500
Revolution und Konterrevolution in China [by A. Losowsky] 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3121786
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2772143
关于积分的说明 7711360
捐赠科研通 2427548
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1289401
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 621451
版权声明 600169