Are all antidepressants the same? The consumer has a point

文拉法辛 舍曲林 安非他酮 西酞普兰 米氮平 心理学 5-羟色胺能 精神科 氟西汀 依西酞普兰 帕罗西汀 易怒 临床心理学 医学
作者
Sebastian Camino,Sergio Strejilevich,Antonella Godoy,Jose Smith,Alejandro Szmulewicz
出处
期刊:Psychological Medicine [Cambridge University Press]
卷期号:: 1-8
标识
DOI:10.1017/s0033291722000678
摘要

Abstract Background Although a large variety of antidepressants agents (AD) with different mechanisms of action are available, no significant differences in efficacy and safety have been shown. However, there have been few attempts to incorporate data on subjective experiences under different AD. Method We conducted a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the posts from the website www.askapatient.com from different AD. We reviewed a random sample of 1000 posts. Result After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, we included a final sample of 450 posts, 50 on each of the most used AD: sertraline, citalopram, paroxetine, escitalopram, fluoxetine, venlafaxine, duloxetine, mirtazapine, and bupropion. Bupropion, citalopram, and venlafaxine had the higher overall satisfaction ratings. Sertraline, paroxetine, and fluoxetine had high reports of emotional blunting, while bupropion very few. Overall satisfaction with AD treatment was inversely associated with the presence of the following side-effects: suicidality, irritability, emotional blunting, cognitive disturbances, and withdrawal symptoms. After adjusting for confounders, only emotional blunting was shown to be more frequently reported by users of serotonergic agents, as compared to non-serotoninergic agents. Conclusion This research points out that the subjective experience of patients under treatment should be taken into consideration when selecting an AD as differences between agents were evident. In contrast to the more frequent treatment decisions, users might prefer receiving a non-serotoninergic agent over a serotonergic one due to their lower propensity to produce emotional blunting.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
安尔完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
英姑应助QQ采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
悠悠应助fallingstar采纳,获得30
1秒前
FashionBoy应助如风采纳,获得10
2秒前
3秒前
爆米花应助胖丁太甜了采纳,获得10
3秒前
快乐的睫毛完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
橙子完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
vicky完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
铅笔丶完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
7秒前
西西发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
悠悠悠幽谷完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
顾矜应助Singularity采纳,获得10
8秒前
susan完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
abocide完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
郭玉强完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
死侍完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
斯文败类应助呼叫554采纳,获得10
9秒前
10秒前
hyx完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
vicky发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
郭梦娇发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
七舟发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
大个应助乌拉拉采纳,获得10
13秒前
兰花二狗他爹完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
cuicui完成签到,获得积分20
13秒前
jinkk完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
东方元语应助无极微光采纳,获得20
14秒前
15秒前
15秒前
科研通AI2S应助fu采纳,获得30
15秒前
永吉发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
wxd发布了新的文献求助30
16秒前
CUI666完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
16秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
2025-2031全球及中国金刚石触媒粉行业研究及十五五规划分析报告 9000
Encyclopedia of the Human Brain Second Edition 8000
The Cambridge History of China: Volume 4, Sui and T'ang China, 589–906 AD, Part Two 1000
The Composition and Relative Chronology of Dynasties 16 and 17 in Egypt 1000
Translanguaging in Action in English-Medium Classrooms: A Resource Book for Teachers 700
Real World Research, 5th Edition 680
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5684323
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 5035995
关于积分的说明 15183907
捐赠科研通 4843598
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2596736
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1549447
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1507972