电催化剂
电解质
催化作用
电流密度
化学
电流(流体)
标杆管理
交换电流密度
化学物理
生物系统
计算机科学
纳米技术
材料科学
热力学
电极
物理
电化学
物理化学
有机化学
量子力学
营销
生物
业务
塔菲尔方程
作者
Sengeni Anantharaj,Pitchiah Esakki Karthik,Suguru Noda
标识
DOI:10.1002/ange.202110352
摘要
Abstract For decades, turnover frequency (TOF) has served as an accurate descriptor of the intrinsic activity of a catalyst, including those in electrocatalytic reactions involving both fuel generation and fuel consumption. Unfortunately, in most of the recent reports in this area, TOF is often not properly reported or not reported at all, in contrast to the overpotentials at a benchmarking current density. The current density is significant in determining the apparent activity, but it is affected by catalyst‐centric parasitic reactions, electrolyte‐centric competing reactions, and capacitance. Luckily, a properly calculated TOF can precisely give the intrinsic activity free from these phenomena in electrocatalysis. In this Viewpoint we ask: 1) What makes the commonly used activity markers unsuitable for intrinsic activity determination? 2) How can TOF reflect the intrinsic activity? 3) Why is TOF still underused in electrocatalysis? 4) What methods are used in TOF determination? and 5) What is essential in the more accurate calculation of TOF? Finally, the significance of normalizing TOF by Faradaic efficiency (FE) is stressed and we give our views on the development of universal analytical tools to determine the exact number of active sites and real surface area for all kinds of materials.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI