Hyaluronic Acid Versus Platelet-Rich Plasma: A Prospective, Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Clinical Outcomes and Effects on Intra-articular Biology for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis

医学 骨关节炎 富血小板血浆 沃马克 随机对照试验 透明质酸 可视模拟标度 滑液 临床试验 膝关节痛 内科学 外科 物理疗法 血小板 病理 替代医学 解剖
作者
Brian J. Cole,Vasili Karas,Kristen Hussey,David Merkow,Kyle Pilz,Lisa A. Fortier
出处
期刊:American Journal of Sports Medicine [SAGE Publishing]
卷期号:45 (2): 339-346 被引量:322
标识
DOI:10.1177/0363546516665809
摘要

Background: The use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) has demonstrated mixed clinical outcomes in randomized controlled trials when compared with hyaluronic acid (HA), an accepted nonsurgical treatment for symptomatic OA. Biological analysis of PRP has demonstrated an anti-inflammatory effect on the intra-articular environment. Purpose: To compare the clinical and biological effects of an intra-articular injection of PRP with those of an intra-articular injection of HA in patients with mild to moderate knee OA. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: A total of 111 patients with symptomatic unilateral knee OA received a series of either leukocyte-poor PRP or HA injections under ultrasound guidance. Clinical data were collected before treatment and at 4 time points across a 1-year period. Synovial fluid was also collected for analysis of proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory markers before treatment and at 12 and 24 weeks after treatment. Several measures were used to assess results: (1) Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale; (2) International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee evaluation, visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and Lysholm knee score; and (3) difference in intra-articular biochemical marker concentrations. Results: There were 49 patients randomized to treatment with PRP and 50 randomized to treatment with HA. No difference was seen between the groups in the primary outcome measure (WOMAC pain score). In the secondary outcome measure, linear contrasts identified a significantly higher IKDC score in the PRP group compared with the HA group at 24 weeks (mean ± standard error [SE], 65.5 ± 3.6 vs 55.8 ± 3.8, respectively; P = .013) and at final follow-up (52 weeks) (57.6 ± 3.37 vs 46.6 ± 3.76, respectively; P = .003). Linear contrasts also identified a statistically lower VAS score in the PRP group versus the HA group at 24 weeks (mean ± SE, 34.6 ± 3.24 vs 48.6 ± 3.7, respectively; P = .0096) and 52 weeks (44 ± 4.6 vs 57.3 ± 3.8, respectively; P = .0039). An examination of fixed effects showed that patients with mild OA and a lower body mass index had a statistically significant improvement in outcomes. In the biochemical analysis, differences between groups approached significance for interleukin-1β (mean ± SE, 0.14 ± 0.05 pg/mL [PRP] vs 0.34 ± 0.16 pg/mL [HA]; P = .06) and tumor necrosis factor α (0.08 ± 0.01 pg/mL [PRP] vs 0.2 ± 0.18 pg/mL [HA]; P = .068) at 12-week follow-up. Conclusion: We found no difference between HA and PRP at any time point in the primary outcome measure: the patient-reported WOMAC pain score. Significant improvements were seen in other patient-reported outcome measures, with results favoring PRP over HA. Preceding a significant difference in subjective outcomes favoring PRP, there was a trend toward a decrease in 2 proinflammatory cytokines, which suggest that the anti-inflammatory properties of PRP may contribute to an improvement of symptoms. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT02588872).
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
赘婿应助失眠朋友采纳,获得10
刚刚
乐乐应助失眠朋友采纳,获得10
刚刚
鸡蛋黄发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
宋敬涛完成签到,获得积分20
2秒前
刘仁轨发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
热切菩萨应助欧维采纳,获得10
3秒前
黄青青完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
JamesPei应助曾经忘幽采纳,获得10
5秒前
小飞侠来咯完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
香蕉觅云应助Atom采纳,获得10
5秒前
shenkedesikao发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
zqx发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
Lucas应助肯瑞恩哭哭采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
小晓完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
Dky_安静的初夏完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
Sandy完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
bkagyin应助chang采纳,获得10
8秒前
9秒前
ghroth完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
朴实灵竹完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
彭于晏应助深呼吸采纳,获得10
9秒前
10秒前
洁净雨柏完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
12秒前
12秒前
King完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
怡然枫叶发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
13秒前
失眠朋友完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
鄂雪娇完成签到,获得积分20
14秒前
田様应助欢喜念双采纳,获得10
14秒前
刻苦大门发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
15秒前
港港完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
15秒前
范东辉完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
高分求助中
Picture Books with Same-sex Parented Families: Unintentional Censorship 700
ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 12th edition 500
Nucleophilic substitution in azasydnone-modified dinitroanisoles 500
不知道标题是什么 500
Indomethacinのヒトにおける経皮吸収 400
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 370
Effective Learning and Mental Wellbeing 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3974358
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3518706
关于积分的说明 11195521
捐赠科研通 3254897
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1797614
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 877011
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 806128