操作化
心理学
决策者
管理科学
决策辅助工具
应用心理学
社会心理学
建议(编程)
知识管理
计算机科学
认识论
医学
工程类
哲学
病理
程序设计语言
替代医学
作者
Silvia Bonaccio,Reeshad S. Dalal
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.07.001
摘要
This paper reviews the advice-giving and advice-taking literature. First, the central findings from this literature are catalogued. Topics include: advice utilization, confidence, decision accuracy, and differences between advisors and decision-makers. Next, the implications of several variations of the experimental design are discussed. These variations include: the presence/absence of a pre-advice decision, the number of advisors, the amount of interaction between the decision-maker and the advisor(s) and also among advisors themselves, whether the decision-maker can choose if and when to access advice, and the type of decision-task. Several ways of measuring advice utilization are subsequently contrasted, and the conventional operationalization of “advice” itself is questioned. Finally, ways in which the advice literature can inform selected topics in the organizational sciences are discussed.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI