焦虑
医院焦虑抑郁量表
医学
收敛有效性
萧条(经济学)
人口
验证性因素分析
临床心理学
随机对照试验
临床试验
物理疗法
精神科
作者
Dennis C. Turk,Robert H. Dworkin,Jeremiah J. Trudeau,Carmela Benson,David M. Biondi,Nathaniel P. Katz,Myoung Kim
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jpain.2015.07.001
摘要
Abstract The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a self-report instrument used to evaluate depression and anxiety in clinical research. The HADS has advantages over other assessments of anxiety and depression; it is efficient in assessing both anxiety and depression with a total of 14 items, and it was originally developed on a general medical rather than psychiatric sample. However, the HADS has not been evaluated specifically for use in clinical trials of acute pain. Validation analyses were conducted on data from a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study of tapentadol immediate release vs oxycodone immediate release for acute low back pain (N = 666). Analyses of psychometric properties, internal consistency, convergent validity, assessments of bias, and confirmatory factor analysis were conducted on pretreatment data. Additional analyses were performed to test the responsiveness and predictive validity of the HADS. Both the Anxiety and Depression subscales 1) showed good psychometric properties, 2) had high internal consistency, 3) displayed good convergent validity, 4) had no unexpected biases, 5) fit the a priori factor structure, and 6) were highly sensitive to changes as a result of analgesic treatment. We conclude that the HADS is a valid instrument for efficient, low-burden assessment of anxiety and depression in clinical trials with an acute low back pain population. Perspective Considered together with the results of other recent studies, the data suggest that the HADS can provide a valid, responsive, and efficient assessment of anxiety and depression in acute low back pain for clinical trials and other clinical research examining acute pain populations.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI