Correlation of EUS-guided portal pressure gradient measurements with hepatic venous pressure gradient: a prospective study

Background and Aims: Hepatic Venous Portal Gradient (HVPG) measurement remains the gold standard for estimating portal pressure gradient (PPG). Aim: To evaluate the correlation between EUS-guided portal pressure gradient (EUS-PPG) and HVPG in patients with chronic portal hypertension. Patients and Methods: Patients with chronic portal hypertension in whom HVPG assessment was clinically indicated were invited to undergo transjugular HVPG and EUS-PPG with a 22G needle in separate sessions for comparison. Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), and Bland-Altman method were used to evaluate the agreement between techniques. Results: 33 patients were included. No significant differences in technical success were observed: EUS-PPG (31/33, 93.9%) vs. HVPG (31/33, 93.9%). Thirty patients who underwent successful EUS-PPG and HVPG were analysed. Correlation between the two techniques showed an ICC: 0.82(0.65-0.91). Four patients had major discrepancies (≥ 5 mmHg) between HVPG and EUS-PPG. No significant differences in adverse events were observed. Conclusions: The correlation between EUS-PPG and HVPG was almost perfect. EUS-PPG could be a safe and reliable method for direct PPG measurement in cirrhotic patients and a valid alternative to HVPG. NCT05689268