奇纳
包裹体(矿物)
心理学
医学教育
介绍(产科)
任务(项目管理)
鉴定(生物学)
医学
护理部
心理干预
社会心理学
植物
生物
放射科
经济
管理
作者
Lisa Gonzalez,Ann Nielsen
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2023.106047
摘要
Historically, emphasis on task-completion and lack of intentional approaches that develop students' thinking skills have dominated clinical education. One contributing factor may be the limited literature about teaching to develop clinical reasoning and clinical judgment in the clinical environment. This integrative review accessed available literature to answer the question, What strategies are used to develop clinical judgment in the clinical education environment? The Whittemore and Knafl approach framed the integrative review. The framework includes the following steps 1) problem identification, 2) literature search, 3) data evaluation, 4) data analysis, and 5) presentation. The data bases CINAHL Plus with Full Text, OVID, and ProQuest were searched through the period of January 2000 through July of 2022. The PRISMA protocol informed review and screening of the literature. Authors assessed articles for eligibility via first screening by abstract review, followed by review of the full text. Both authors reviewed the articles, assessing qualification for inclusion and evaluating the content. Data from eligible articles were analyzed and synthesized to answer the research question. Of the initial 427 articles, a total of 20 articles met inclusion criteria for final analysis. Five general themes emerged for clinical judgment during clinical education. The findings identified the teaching strategies nurse educators use. Many of the teaching methods include deliberateness and intentionality in planning and implementing the strategies. In addition to evaluating clinical judgment, nurse educators guided and mentored student thinking. Finally, this review identified reported outcomes and results of the teaching strategies and methods. A limited number of articles describing teaching for clinical judgment in clinical environment were found. The articles analyzed found that nurse educators used a variety of teaching strategies for the purpose of developing students' clinical judgment. More research is needed to guide best-practices in clinical education. We must move the science forward to transform and leverage clinical education more deliberately to teach thinking in practice and decision-making about patient care.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI