磷酸铁锂
泥浆
阳极
锂(药物)
电极
阴极
材料科学
石墨
电池(电)
化学工程
普鲁士蓝
磷酸铁
离子
锂离子电池
钠
磷酸盐
复合材料
化学
电化学
冶金
医学
功率(物理)
物理
有机化学
物理化学
量子力学
工程类
内分泌学
作者
Julian Klemens,Ann‐Kathrin Wurba,David Burger,Marcus Müller,Werner Bauer,Sebastian Büchele,Olatz Leonet,J. Alberto Blázquez,Iker Boyano,Elixabete Ayerbe,Helmut Ehrenberg,Jürgen Fleischer,Anna Smith,Philip Scharfer,Wilhelm Schabel
标识
DOI:10.1002/batt.202300291
摘要
Abstract Sodium‐ion batteries are an emerging technology that is still at an early stage of development. The electrode processing for anode and cathode is expected to be similar to lithium‐ion batteries (drop‐in technology), yet a detailed comparison is not published. There are ongoing questions about the influence of the active materials on processing parameters such as slurry viscosity, coating thicknesses, drying times, and behavior during fast drying. Herein, the expected drying time for the same areal capacity of anodes (graphite vs. hard carbon) and cathodes (lithium iron phosphate vs. Prussian blue analogs) are compared based on respective specific capacities reported in the literature. Estimates are made for the materials’ impact on production speed or dryer length. Within the experimental part, water‐based slurries of the same composition are mixed using different active materials according to identical procedure and the viscosity is compared. When drying at a constant drying rate (0.75 g m −2 s −1 ), lithium iron phosphate electrodes with different areal capacities (1–3 mAh cm −2 ) are shown to have the highest adhesion. For high drying rates (3 g m −2 s −1 ) at constant areal capacity, especially the investigated electrodes based on hard carbon show that no binder migration occurs.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI