The association between beta‐blockers use and prostate cancer mortality: A mini systematic review and meta‐analysis

荟萃分析 医学 前列腺癌 BETA(编程语言) 肿瘤科 内科学 前列腺 癌症 计算机科学 程序设计语言
作者
Alessandro Uleri,Michael Baboudjian,Alessandro Tedde,Paweł Rajwa,Benjamin Pradère,Andrea Gallioli,Alberto Breda,Guillaume Ploussard
出处
期刊:The Prostate [Wiley]
卷期号:84 (1): 3-7 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1002/pros.24623
摘要

Preclinical studies have shown that the sympathetic nervous system is involved in the development of metastases, suggesting a potential antitumor effect of beta-blockers. These findings sparked a controversy over the past decade regarding the direction of the association between beta-blocker use and prostate cancer (PCa) mortality. To investigate this association, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis.The review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines to identify eligible studies. The primary outcome was PCa mortality in beta-blocker users versus nonusers, and overall survival was studied as a secondary endpoint. We assessed heterogeneity using the Cochrane Q test and quantified it using I2 values. In the case of heterogeneity (Cochrane Q test p < 0.05 and I2 > 50%), random-effect models were used to determine the association between beta-blockers use and survival outcomes.Ten studies met our inclusion criteria and a total of 74,970 patients were included: 26,674 beta-blocker users and 48,326 nonusers. There was no statistically significant association between beta-blocker exposure and PCa mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87-1.09; p = 0.61). However, significant heterogeneity was found. Meta-regression analysis to explain heterogeneity showed no effect of any of the variables assessed (country, percentage of beta-blocker users, type of beta-blocker [selective and nonselective], study period, PCa stage and follow-up duration; all p > 0.05). We found similar results when we restricted the analysis to studies that include only patients with advanced PCa (HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.80-1.06; p = 0.24). Similarly, we found no association with overall survival (HR 1.02; 95% CI 0.94-1.10; p = 0.64). Meta-regression analysis was also performed, but none of the variables assessed explained the observed heterogeneity (all p > 0.05).We found no association between beta-blockers use and overall survival or PCa mortality. This meta-analysis, which includes a considerable population and the most recent literature, provides important data for routine clinical care and patient counseling.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
王先进完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
Hello应助王飞跃采纳,获得10
1秒前
sjx_13351766056完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
王先进发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
Kemmy完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
5秒前
JamesYang发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
心想事成发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
fengquan完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
peijiang发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
微笑的语芙完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
枫cxf163发布了新的文献求助200
9秒前
Clary发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
Yuanyuan发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
唠叨的白曼完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
RRR完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
river_121完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
Ava应助JamesYang采纳,获得10
14秒前
15秒前
hy完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
16秒前
九月完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
fxs666完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
卡卡西发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
Alice发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
17秒前
泪小桥发布了新的文献求助30
17秒前
20秒前
上官若男应助幸福采纳,获得10
20秒前
无花果应助cavi采纳,获得10
20秒前
20秒前
20秒前
Allure发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Introduction to strong mixing conditions volume 1-3 5000
Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, Multi-Volume, 5th Edition 2000
从k到英国情人 1500
Ägyptische Geschichte der 21.–30. Dynastie 1100
„Semitische Wissenschaften“? 1100
Russian Foreign Policy: Change and Continuity 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5729141
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 5316369
关于积分的说明 15315857
捐赠科研通 4876150
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2619263
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1568820
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1525317