Efficacy and Safety of Biologics for Oral Corticosteroid–Dependent Asthma: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

医学 苯拉唑马布 杜皮鲁玛 美波利祖马布 哮喘 安慰剂 不利影响 内科学 随机对照试验 皮质类固醇 嗜酸性粒细胞 病理 替代医学
作者
Phichayut Phinyo,Thanachit Krikeerati,Irin Vichara-Anont,Torpong Thongngarm
出处
期刊:The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:12 (2): 409-420 被引量:10
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jaip.2023.11.007
摘要

Background

A maintenance oral corticosteroid (OCS) in addition to high-dose inhaled corticosteroids plus long-acting β2-agonists in patients with severe asthma leads to long-term adverse events. Oral corticosteroid–sparing agents are of high priority.

Objective

This network meta-analysis assessed biologics' comparative efficacy and safety in OCS-dependent patients with asthma.

Methods

We performed a systematic search through PubMed, Scopus, Embase, the Cochrane Center of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar for randomized controlled trials that addressed the efficacy and safety of biologics compared with placebo in OCS-dependent patients with asthma from inception to July 2023. The primary outcome was an overall reduction in the OCS dose while asthma control was maintained.

Results

We included seven randomized controlled trials involving 1,052 OCS-dependent patients with asthma. Compared with placebo, benralizumab every 8 weeks, benralizumab every 4 weeks, dupilumab, and mepolizumab were efficacious in achieving a reduction in the OCS dose with low to moderate confidence (odds ratio [95% CI]: 4.12 [2.22-7.64]; 4.09 [2.22-7.55]; 3.25 [1.90-5.55]; and 2.39 [1.25-4.57], respectively) whereas tralokinumab, tezepelumab, and subcutaneous reslizumab were ineffective. An indirect comparison found no significant differences among benralizumab, dupilumab, and mepolizumab. Efficacy in reducing exacerbations was consistent with the primary analysis. High baseline blood eosinophil counts benefit from anti–IL-5 therapies, whereas high FeNO levels favor dupilumab regardless of blood eosinophil counts. Adverse events between biologics and placebo were comparable, except for eosinophilia with dupilumab.

Conclusions

In OCS-dependent patients with asthma, benralizumab, dupilumab, and mepolizumab were superior to placebo in reducing the OCS dose. Evaluating baseline biomarkers helps in choosing the proper biologics to maximize treatment effects.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
2秒前
无花果应助我的光采纳,获得10
2秒前
思源应助和和采纳,获得10
6秒前
任性雁风发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
9秒前
9秒前
CodeCraft应助伶俐的书白采纳,获得10
11秒前
跳跳虎完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
13秒前
coini发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
zhangyu6160发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
Lesley完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
jingzhang发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
19秒前
哦哦哦完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
liaodongjun应助qiao采纳,获得30
22秒前
zhang值完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
蓝桉发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
休眠补正完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
sybil完成签到,获得积分20
25秒前
sht发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
Ava应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
26秒前
英姑应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
27秒前
wysy应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
27秒前
田様应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
27秒前
happyAlice应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
27秒前
情怀应助科研通管家采纳,获得50
27秒前
彭于晏应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
27秒前
陌疑应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
27秒前
ED应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
27秒前
所所应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
27秒前
将将将应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
27秒前
星辰大海应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
27秒前
慕青应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
27秒前
lll应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
27秒前
27秒前
27秒前
NexusExplorer应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
27秒前
典雅的夜梦完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
高分求助中
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind 1000
Technical Brochure TB 814: LPIT applications in HV gas insulated switchgear 1000
Immigrant Incorporation in East Asian Democracies 500
Nucleophilic substitution in azasydnone-modified dinitroanisoles 500
不知道标题是什么 500
A Preliminary Study on Correlation Between Independent Components of Facial Thermal Images and Subjective Assessment of Chronic Stress 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3966344
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3511753
关于积分的说明 11159558
捐赠科研通 3246341
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1793389
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 874417
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 804361