Outcomes After Endoscopic Evacuation Versus Evacuation Using Craniotomy or Stereotactic Aspiration for Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Analysis Using a Japanese Nationwide Database

医学 开颅术 脑出血 优势比 改良兰金量表 倾向得分匹配 置信区间 外科 自发性脑出血 子群分析 麻醉 格拉斯哥昏迷指数 内科学 缺血性中风 缺血
作者
Shigeyuki Tahara,Yujiro Hattori,Shotaro Aso,Kazuaki Uda,Ryosuke Kumazawa,Hiroki Matsui,Kiyohide Fushimi,Hideo Yasunaga,Akio Morita
出处
期刊:Neurocritical Care [Springer Science+Business Media]
卷期号:38 (3): 667-675 被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1007/s12028-022-01634-9
摘要

Various surgical methods are available for managing large intracerebral hemorrhage. This study compared the prognosis of patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage who underwent endoscopic evacuation, stereotactic aspiration, and craniotomy by using a nationwide inpatient database in Japan. Using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database, we identified patients who underwent surgery for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage within 48 h after admission between April 2014 and March 2018. Eligible patients were classified into three groups according to the type of surgery (endoscopic surgery, stereotactic surgery, and craniotomy). Propensity score matching weight analysis was conducted to compare poor modified Rankin Scale score at discharge (severe disability or death) and hospitalization cost among the groups. Among 17,860 eligible patients, craniotomy, stereotactic surgery, and endoscopic surgery were performed in 14,354, 474, and 3,032 patients, respectively. In the matching weight analysis, all covariates were well balanced. Compared with the endoscopic surgery group, the proportion of poor prognosis (modified Rankin Scale score at discharge of 5 or 6) was significantly higher in craniotomy groups (odds ratio 2.51, 95% confidence interval 1.11–5.68; p = 0.028). Subgroup analysis based on hemorrhage location and consciousness level at the time of admission showed no significant difference between the surgical procedures. Hospitalization costs were significantly higher in the craniotomy group than in the endoscopic surgery group (difference US $9,724, 95% confidence interval 2,169–17,259; p = 0.011). Endoscopic surgery for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage was associated with improved prognosis compared with craniotomy at the hospital discharge. Future large-scale clinical trials are needed to evaluate the optimal surgical techniques for intracerebral hemorrhage.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
肆_完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
cwp发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
加油完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
彗星入梦完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
Panini完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
薛乎虚完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
chen完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
222完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
TKTKW发布了新的文献求助30
8秒前
9秒前
swy完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
Yuuuu完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
自然的小熊猫完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
11秒前
孙燕应助完犊子采纳,获得10
12秒前
浩浩完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
迷路凌柏完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
现代风格完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
学术菜鸡123完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
画风湖湘卷完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
LUNWENREQUEST发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
wanci应助a1313采纳,获得10
19秒前
Muccio完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
葛藟萦藤完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
七QI完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
橘生淮南完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
感性的神级完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
不想太多完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
26秒前
cwp完成签到,获得积分20
26秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
fd163c应助开心人达采纳,获得10
27秒前
jixuzhuixun完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
gzf213完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
YJ完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
少吃顿饭并不难完成签到 ,获得积分10
30秒前
31秒前
娅娃儿完成签到 ,获得积分10
31秒前
高分求助中
The Mother of All Tableaux: Order, Equivalence, and Geometry in the Large-scale Structure of Optimality Theory 3000
Social Research Methods (4th Edition) by Maggie Walter (2019) 2390
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
北师大毕业论文 基于可调谐半导体激光吸收光谱技术泄漏气体检测系统的研究 390
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 370
Robot-supported joining of reinforcement textiles with one-sided sewing heads 360
Atlas of Interventional Pain Management 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4008834
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3548485
关于积分的说明 11298899
捐赠科研通 3283114
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1810290
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 886000
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 811220