Patient-reported outcomes, weight loss, and remission of type 2 diabetes 3 years after gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy (Oseberg); a single-centre, randomised controlled trial

医学 袖状胃切除术 2型糖尿病 减肥 糖尿病 外科 人口 随机对照试验 糖化血红素 随机化 内科学 胃旁路手术 肥胖 胃分流术 环境卫生 内分泌学
作者
Marius Svanevik,Jolanta Lorentzen,Heidi Borgeraas,Rune Sandbu,Birgitte Seip,Asle W. Medhus,Jens Kristoffer Hertel,Ronette L. Kolotkin,Milada Cvancarova Småstuen,Dag Hofsø,Jøran Hjelmesæth
出处
期刊:The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology [Elsevier]
卷期号:11 (8): 555-566 被引量:19
标识
DOI:10.1016/s2213-8587(23)00127-4
摘要

Little is known about the comparative effects of various bariatric procedures on patient-reported outcomes. We aimed to compare 3-year effects of gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy on patient-reported outcome measures in patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes.The Oseberg trial was a single-centre, parallel-group, randomised trial at Vestfold Hospital Trust, a public tertiary obesity centre in Tønsberg, Norway. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with previously verified BMI 35·0 kg/m2 or greater. Diabetes was diagnosed if glycated haemoglobin was at least 6·5% (48 mmol/mol) or by their use of anti-diabetic medications with glycated haemoglobin at least 6·1% (43 mmol/mol). Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy. All patients received identical preoperative and postoperative treatment. Randomisation was done with a computerised random number generator and a block size of ten. Study personnel, patients, and the primary outcome assessor were blinded to allocations for 1 year. The prespecified secondary outcomes reported here were 3-year changes in several clinically important patient-reported outcomes, weight loss, and diabetes remission. Analyses were done in the intention to treat population. This trial is ongoing, closed to recruitment and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01778738.Between Oct 15, 2012 and Sept 1, 2017, 319 consecutive patients with type 2 diabetes scheduled for bariatric surgery were assessed for eligibility. 101 patients were not eligible (29 did not have type 2 diabetes according to inclusion criteria and 72 other exclusion criteria) and 93 declined to participate. 109 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to sleeve gastrectomy (n=55) or gastric bypass (n=54). 72 (66%) of 109 patients were female and 37 (34%) were male. 104 (95%) of patients were White. 16 patients were lost to follow up and 93 (85%) patients completed the 3-year follow-up. Three additional patients were contacted by phone for registration of comorbidities Compared with sleeve gastrectomy, gastric bypass was associated with a greater improvement in weight-related quality of life (between group difference 9·4, 95% CI 3·3 to 15·5), less reflux symptoms (0·54, 0·17 to -0·90), greater total bodyweight loss (8% difference, 25% vs 17%), and a higher probability of diabetes remission (67% vs 33%, risk ratio 2·00; 95% CI 1·27 to 3·14). Five patients reported postprandial hypoglycaemia in the third year after gastric bypass versus none after sleeve-gastrectomy (p=0·059). Symptoms of abdominal pain, indigestion, diarrhoea, dumping syndrome, depression, binge eating, and appetitive drive did not differ between groups.At 3 years, gastric bypass was superior to sleeve gastrectomy in patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity regarding weight related quality of life, reflux symptoms, weight loss, and remission of diabetes, while symptoms of abdominal pain, indigestion, diarrhoea, dumping, depression and binge eating did not differ between groups. This new patient-reported knowledge can be used in the shared decision-making process to inform patients about similarities and differences between expected outcomes after the two surgical procedures.Morbid Obesity Centre, Vestfold Hospital Trust.For the Norwegian translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
刚刚
微笑的白羊完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
包容凌翠发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
Yifan2024完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
汉堡包应助奎尼丁采纳,获得10
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
123完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
852应助瑶瑶瑶妹儿采纳,获得10
4秒前
星星发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
leezcc完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
TingWan发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
赵银志发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
小魔笛发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
倪倪梦懿完成签到,获得积分20
6秒前
蓝莲花完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
大大完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
小蘑菇应助月兮2013采纳,获得10
6秒前
坚强丹雪完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
益安完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
三里墩头完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
9秒前
9秒前
wang完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
TingWan完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
gaochunjing发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
彭于晏应助子枫采纳,获得10
12秒前
星星完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
cc发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
bmyy完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
minifox完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
丁老三完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
研友_LJeoa8发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
李爱国应助HOHO采纳,获得10
14秒前
CARL发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
高分求助中
Evolution 10000
Sustainability in Tides Chemistry 2800
юрские динозавры восточного забайкалья 800
English Wealden Fossils 700
A new species of Coccus (Homoptera: Coccoidea) from Malawi 500
A new species of Velataspis (Hemiptera Coccoidea Diaspididae) from tea in Assam 500
Diagnostic immunohistochemistry : theranostic and genomic applications 6th Edition 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3155375
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2806300
关于积分的说明 7869086
捐赠科研通 2464734
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1311923
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 629783
版权声明 601880