Tumor budding in breast carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

瘤芽 淋巴血管侵犯 肿瘤科 乳腺癌 医学 内科学 乳腺癌 荟萃分析 分级(工程) 转移 病理 淋巴结转移 癌症 生物 生态学
作者
Archana Buch,Uzair Khan,Hetal Rathod,Khushi Jain,Aryan Dwivedi,Arasi Rajesh
出处
期刊:Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics [BioMed Central]
卷期号:19 (7): 1697-1713 被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_188_22
摘要

ABSTRACT Tumor budding is gaining importance as a prognostic factor in various carcinomas due to its association with epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) and hence clinical outcome. Reporting tumor budding in breast cancer lacks homogeneity. We aim to systematically review the existing literature and conduct a meta-analysis to assess the prognostic implication of tumor budding in breast carcinoma. A systematic search was performed to identify studies that compared different prognostic variables between high- and low-grade tumor budding. Quality assessment was performed using a modified Newcastle Ottawa Scale. Dichotomous variables were pooled using the odds ratio using the Der–Simonian–Laird method. Meta-analysis was conducted to study the association between low/high-grade tumor budding and tumor grade, lymph node metastasis, lymphovascular invasion, ER, PR, HER2neu, KI67, and the molecular subtype triple-negative breast carcinoma. Thirteen studies with a total of 1763 patients were included. A moderate risk of bias was noted. The median bias scoring was 7 (6–9). High-grade tumor budding was significantly associated with lymph node metastasis (OR: 2.25, 95% CI: 1.52–3.34, P < 0.01) and lymphovascular invasion (OR: 3.14, 95% CI: 2.10–4.71, P < 0.01), and low-grade budding was significantly associated with triple-negative breast carcinoma (OR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.39–0.95, P = 0.03) There was significant heterogeneity in the assessment and grading of tumor budding; thus, a checklist of items was identified that lacked standardization. Our meta-analysis concluded that tumor budding can act as an independent prognostic marker for breast cancer.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
蜗牛应助CarolineOY采纳,获得10
刚刚
koxall完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
杨杨发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
嘿嘿应助张宁波采纳,获得10
2秒前
辣辣完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
草学研究完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
笨笨芝麻完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
小伍完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
炸炸桃完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
gao完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
lxb完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
夹谷蕈完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
俭朴的老黑完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
禾沐发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
科研小锄头完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
思源应助poppy采纳,获得10
7秒前
有点小卑鄙完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助LTB采纳,获得10
7秒前
3242晶发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
shelly完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
金金金完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
五五我发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
小桑桑完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
11秒前
LIUDAN发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
11秒前
Teirow完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
自由的山柏完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
二橦完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
高分求助中
Encyclopedia of Quaternary Science Third edition 2025 12000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The Social Work Ethics Casebook: Cases and Commentary (revised 2nd ed.). Frederic G. Reamer 800
Beyond the sentence : discourse and sentential form / edited by Jessica R. Wirth 600
Holistic Discourse Analysis 600
Vertébrés continentaux du Crétacé supérieur de Provence (Sud-Est de la France) 600
Vertebrate Palaeontology, 5th Edition 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 遗传学 催化作用 冶金 量子力学 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5337533
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4474745
关于积分的说明 13925710
捐赠科研通 4369749
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2400934
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1394041
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1365885