Machine learning does not outperform traditional statistical modelling for kidney allograft failure prediction

百分位 四分位数 支持向量机 医学 置信区间 队列 肾移植 内科学 比例危险模型 机器学习 梯度升压 肾移植 人工智能 随机森林 计算机科学 统计 移植 数学
作者
Agathe Truchot,Marc Raynaud,Nassim Kamar,Maarten Naesens,Christophe Legendre,Michel Delahousse,Olivier Thaunat,Matthias Büchler,Marta Crespo,Kamilla Linhares,Babak J. Orandi,Enver Akalin,Gervacio Soler Pujol,Hélio Tedesco‐Silva,Gaurav Gupta,Dorry L. Segev,Xavier Jouven,Andrew Bentall,Mark D. Stegall,Carmen Lefaucheur
出处
期刊:Kidney International [Elsevier]
卷期号:103 (5): 936-948 被引量:28
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.kint.2022.12.011
摘要

Machine learning (ML) models have recently shown potential for predicting kidney allograft outcomes. However, their ability to outperform traditional approaches remains poorly investigated. Therefore, using large cohorts of kidney transplant recipients from 14 centers worldwide, we developed ML-based prediction models for kidney allograft survival and compared their prediction performances to those achieved by a validated Cox-Based Prognostication System (CBPS). In a French derivation cohort of 4000 patients, candidate determinants of allograft failure including donor, recipient and transplant-related parameters were used as predictors to develop tree-based models (RSF, RSF-ERT, CIF), Support Vector Machine models (LK-SVM, AK-SVM) and a gradient boosting model (XGBoost). Models were externally validated with cohorts of 2214 patients from Europe, 1537 from North America, and 671 from South America. Among these 8422 kidney transplant recipients, 1081 (12.84%) lost their grafts after a median post-transplant follow-up time of 6.25 years (Inter Quartile Range 4.33-8.73). At seven years post-risk evaluation, the ML models achieved a C-index of 0.788 (95% bootstrap percentile confidence interval 0.736-0.833), 0.779 (0.724-0.825), 0.786 (0.735-0.832), 0.527 (0.456-0.602), 0.704 (0.648-0.759) and 0.767 (0.711-0.815) for RSF, RSF-ERT, CIF, LK-SVM, AK-SVM and XGBoost respectively, compared with 0.808 (0.792-0.829) for the CBPS. In validation cohorts, ML models' discrimination performances were in a similar range of those of the CBPS. Calibrations of the ML models were similar or less accurate than those of the CBPS. Thus, when using a transparent methodological pipeline in validated international cohorts, ML models, despite overall good performances, do not outperform a traditional CBPS in predicting kidney allograft failure. Hence, our current study supports the continued use of traditional statistical approaches for kidney graft prognostication.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Tsuki应助明芬采纳,获得10
刚刚
halsuen完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
刚刚
1秒前
Bdcy完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
zhongxia完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
鱼山完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
沙漠完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
大模型应助宣以晴采纳,获得10
2秒前
机智的早晨完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
爆米花应助科研鸟采纳,获得10
3秒前
milagu发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
杭雨雪完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
Duke完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
cmccs发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
jou完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
zhang005on完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
bo应助缥缈伟祺采纳,获得10
5秒前
ruoyu111完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
海滨之鹅完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
Jiang完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
zh5841314525完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
鱼乐乐完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
网络药理学完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
从容向真完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
wonderting完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
临河盗龙完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
玫瑰西高地完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
科研通AI6.1应助Margo采纳,获得10
9秒前
顺其自然完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
粱乘风完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
小柯完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
内向乾完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
gelinhao完成签到,获得积分0
9秒前
曾经如冬完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
画风湖湘卷完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
吴皮皮鲁完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, Ninth edition 5000
Aerospace Standards Index - 2026 ASIN2026 3000
Polymorphism and polytypism in crystals 1000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Discrete-Time Signals and Systems 610
T/SNFSOC 0002—2025 独居石精矿碱法冶炼工艺技术标准 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 冶金 遗传学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6043378
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7805546
关于积分的说明 16239516
捐赠科研通 5189024
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2776772
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1759833
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1643349