Machine learning does not outperform traditional statistical modelling for kidney allograft failure prediction

百分位 四分位数 支持向量机 医学 置信区间 队列 肾移植 内科学 比例危险模型 机器学习 梯度升压 肾移植 人工智能 随机森林 计算机科学 统计 移植 数学
作者
Agathe Truchot,Marc Raynaud,Nassim Kamar,Maarten Naesens,Christophe Legendre,Michel Delahousse,Olivier Thaunat,Matthias Büchler,Marta Crespo,Kamilla Linhares,Babak J. Orandi,Enver Akalin,Gervacio Soler Pujol,Hélio Tedesco‐Silva,Gaurav Gupta,Dorry L. Segev,Xavier Jouven,Andrew Bentall,Mark D. Stegall,Carmen Lefaucheur
出处
期刊:Kidney International [Elsevier]
卷期号:103 (5): 936-948 被引量:28
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.kint.2022.12.011
摘要

Machine learning (ML) models have recently shown potential for predicting kidney allograft outcomes. However, their ability to outperform traditional approaches remains poorly investigated. Therefore, using large cohorts of kidney transplant recipients from 14 centers worldwide, we developed ML-based prediction models for kidney allograft survival and compared their prediction performances to those achieved by a validated Cox-Based Prognostication System (CBPS). In a French derivation cohort of 4000 patients, candidate determinants of allograft failure including donor, recipient and transplant-related parameters were used as predictors to develop tree-based models (RSF, RSF-ERT, CIF), Support Vector Machine models (LK-SVM, AK-SVM) and a gradient boosting model (XGBoost). Models were externally validated with cohorts of 2214 patients from Europe, 1537 from North America, and 671 from South America. Among these 8422 kidney transplant recipients, 1081 (12.84%) lost their grafts after a median post-transplant follow-up time of 6.25 years (Inter Quartile Range 4.33-8.73). At seven years post-risk evaluation, the ML models achieved a C-index of 0.788 (95% bootstrap percentile confidence interval 0.736-0.833), 0.779 (0.724-0.825), 0.786 (0.735-0.832), 0.527 (0.456-0.602), 0.704 (0.648-0.759) and 0.767 (0.711-0.815) for RSF, RSF-ERT, CIF, LK-SVM, AK-SVM and XGBoost respectively, compared with 0.808 (0.792-0.829) for the CBPS. In validation cohorts, ML models' discrimination performances were in a similar range of those of the CBPS. Calibrations of the ML models were similar or less accurate than those of the CBPS. Thus, when using a transparent methodological pipeline in validated international cohorts, ML models, despite overall good performances, do not outperform a traditional CBPS in predicting kidney allograft failure. Hence, our current study supports the continued use of traditional statistical approaches for kidney graft prognostication.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
1秒前
小字发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
我是老大应助风车采纳,获得10
1秒前
小树完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
DDDD发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
华仔应助jevon采纳,获得10
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
hehehe发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
Steven24go发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
西园寺鹿旎完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
我是老大应助一直以来采纳,获得10
4秒前
年刺猬发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
wh1t3zZ完成签到,获得积分20
4秒前
赵佳霓发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
hetao286发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
科研通AI6.1应助张福豪采纳,获得10
4秒前
xxxl发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
斯文败类应助二硫碘化钾采纳,获得10
5秒前
zz发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
欣喜觅风完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
Gao完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
星辰大海应助淡定的萝莉采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
GCXH完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
llll完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
wb发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
巴啦啦完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
蕾蕾蕾发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
8秒前
8秒前
欧小仙发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, Ninth edition 5000
Aerospace Standards Index - 2026 ASIN2026 3000
Terrorism and Power in Russia: The Empire of (In)security and the Remaking of Politics 1000
Polymorphism and polytypism in crystals 1000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Discrete-Time Signals and Systems 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 冶金 遗传学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6046008
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7820575
关于积分的说明 16250791
捐赠科研通 5191472
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2778006
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1761168
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1644145