美罗培南
粘菌素
肺炎克雷伯菌
创新者
微生物学
最小抑制浓度
医学
药理学
抗菌剂
生物
抗生素
抗生素耐药性
大肠杆菌
基因
生物化学
知识产权
计算机科学
操作系统
作者
Pierre Tattevin,Aurélien Dinh,Idir Ghout,William Mouton,Marie‐Clémence Verdier,Frédéric Laurent,Florian Lemaître,L. Gatin,Azzam Saleh-Mghir,A Crémieux
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106152
摘要
Guidelines for the management of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) infections recommend a combination of two active agents, including meropenem if the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) is ≤8 mg/L. The therapeutic equivalence of meropenem generics has been challenged. We compared the bactericidal activity of meropenem innovator (AstraZeneca) and four generic products (Actavis, Kabi, Mylan and Panpharma), both in vitro and in vivo, in association with colistin. In vitro time-kill studies were performed at 4 × MIC. An experimental model of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae osteomyelitis was induced in rabbits by tibial injection of a sclerosing agent followed by 2 × 108 CFU of K. pneumoniae KPC-99YC (meropenem MIC = 4 mg/L; colistin MIC = 1 mg/L). At 14 days after inoculation, treatment for 7 days started in seven groups of ≥10 rabbits, including a control group, a colistin group, and one group for each meropenem product (i.e. the innovator and four generics), in combination with colistin. In vitro, meropenem + colistin was bactericidal with no viable bacteria after 6 h, and this effect was similar with all meropenem products. In the osteomyelitis model, there was no significant difference between meropenem generics and the innovator when combined with colistin. Colistin-resistant strains were detected after treatment with colistin + meropenem innovator (n = 3) and generics (n = 3). The efficacy of four meropenem generics did not differ from the innovator in vitro and in an experimental rabbit model of KPC-producing K. pneumoniae osteomyelitis in terms of bactericidal activity and the emergence of resistance.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI