Nonpharmacological interventions for cancer-related cognitive impairment in adult cancer patients: A network meta-analysis

心理干预 荟萃分析 随机对照试验 医学 物理疗法 认知 认知训练 精神科 内科学
作者
Yingchun Zeng,Juntao Dong,Meiling Huang,Jun Zhang,Xiaoming Zhang,Man Xie,Jeffrey S. Wefel
出处
期刊:International Journal of Nursing Studies [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:104: 103514-103514 被引量:55
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103514
摘要

Conventional meta-analyses can only provide direct comparison evidence, and the best options of nonpharmacological interventions for cancer-related cognitive impairment remain largely unknown. To evaluate the comparative effects of all known nonpharmacological interventions for cancer-related cognitive impairment, and to rank the best intervention options for adult non- central nervous system cancer patients with cancer-related cognitive impairment. Systematic review with a new analytic approach of network meta-analysis. Six electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials from January 2010 to July 2019. Literature screening, data extraction and quality appraisal was undertaken systematically by two independent reviewers. Quantitative network meta-analysis performed to analyze key study outcomes. The primary outcome was the effectiveness of interventions on subjective cognitive function, and the secondary outcome was the safety of nonpharmacological interventions for cancer-related cognitive impairment. There were 29 eligible randomized controlled trials searched, and a total of 10 interventions identified. All 29 randomized controlled trials that were included had no reported significant adverse events, therefore, these 10 nonpharmacological interventions are safe for cancer-related cognitive impairment management. In terms of effectiveness, the pooled overall effects were in favor of these 10 nonpharmacological interventions. The most effective interventions included meditation, cognitive training, cognitive rehabilitation, and exercise interventions, with a mean difference of effective size plus 95% confidence interval 10.26 (1.53, 19.00), 5.02 (1.41, 8.63), 4.88 (0.65, 9.11), and 3.82 (0.52, 7.13), respectively. Other treatment effects did not show statistically significant differences. This network meta-analysis found that meditation interventions, cognitive training, cognitive rehabilitation, and exercise were the most effective interventions for adult non-central nervous system cancer patients to manage cancer-related cognitive impairment. Results of this network meta-analysis contribute evidence-based data to inform medical decision-making.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
在水一方应助yuan采纳,获得10
1秒前
阿玖发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
剁椒鱼头完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
chandangfo应助Albee0907采纳,获得50
3秒前
知晏发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
anyelengxin完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
冻干粉发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
asdfqwer发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
SciGPT应助zzz采纳,获得10
6秒前
8秒前
铁板发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
9秒前
chen发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
顺利白竹发布了新的文献求助30
13秒前
张aa发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
烟花应助黄芩采纳,获得10
14秒前
执着幻桃发布了新的文献求助30
14秒前
15秒前
16秒前
科研通AI6.3应助碧蓝铁身采纳,获得10
16秒前
科研人发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
小方完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
Jh发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
Chloe发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
19秒前
Stuart完成签到,获得积分20
19秒前
吸氧羊发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
晨晨发布了新的社区帖子
21秒前
留胡子的之云完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
HaroldNguyen完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
汉堡包应助Wesley采纳,获得10
23秒前
alatus发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
知晏完成签到,获得积分20
24秒前
张aa完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
26秒前
28秒前
28秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
晶种分解过程与铝酸钠溶液混合强度关系的探讨 8888
Les Mantodea de Guyane Insecta, Polyneoptera 2000
Leading Academic-Practice Partnerships in Nursing and Healthcare: A Paradigm for Change 800
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
The Sage Handbook of Digital Labour 600
The formation of Australian attitudes towards China, 1918-1941 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6416763
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8235894
关于积分的说明 17493618
捐赠科研通 5469616
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2889606
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1866587
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1703745