Nonpharmacological interventions for cancer-related cognitive impairment in adult cancer patients: A network meta-analysis

心理干预 荟萃分析 随机对照试验 医学 物理疗法 认知 认知训练 精神科 内科学
作者
Yingchun Zeng,Juntao Dong,Meiling Huang,Jun Zhang,Xiaoming Zhang,Man Xie,Jeffrey S. Wefel
出处
期刊:International Journal of Nursing Studies [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:104: 103514-103514 被引量:55
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103514
摘要

Conventional meta-analyses can only provide direct comparison evidence, and the best options of nonpharmacological interventions for cancer-related cognitive impairment remain largely unknown. To evaluate the comparative effects of all known nonpharmacological interventions for cancer-related cognitive impairment, and to rank the best intervention options for adult non- central nervous system cancer patients with cancer-related cognitive impairment. Systematic review with a new analytic approach of network meta-analysis. Six electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials from January 2010 to July 2019. Literature screening, data extraction and quality appraisal was undertaken systematically by two independent reviewers. Quantitative network meta-analysis performed to analyze key study outcomes. The primary outcome was the effectiveness of interventions on subjective cognitive function, and the secondary outcome was the safety of nonpharmacological interventions for cancer-related cognitive impairment. There were 29 eligible randomized controlled trials searched, and a total of 10 interventions identified. All 29 randomized controlled trials that were included had no reported significant adverse events, therefore, these 10 nonpharmacological interventions are safe for cancer-related cognitive impairment management. In terms of effectiveness, the pooled overall effects were in favor of these 10 nonpharmacological interventions. The most effective interventions included meditation, cognitive training, cognitive rehabilitation, and exercise interventions, with a mean difference of effective size plus 95% confidence interval 10.26 (1.53, 19.00), 5.02 (1.41, 8.63), 4.88 (0.65, 9.11), and 3.82 (0.52, 7.13), respectively. Other treatment effects did not show statistically significant differences. This network meta-analysis found that meditation interventions, cognitive training, cognitive rehabilitation, and exercise were the most effective interventions for adult non-central nervous system cancer patients to manage cancer-related cognitive impairment. Results of this network meta-analysis contribute evidence-based data to inform medical decision-making.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
lqr发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
焱焱不忘完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
乐乐应助星河采纳,获得10
2秒前
早睡早起的安完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
英姑应助搞怪的世德采纳,获得10
2秒前
高越完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
科研通AI6.4应助商南风采纳,获得30
2秒前
青光发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
可爱的函函应助xuanxuan采纳,获得30
4秒前
善学以致用应助ibanya采纳,获得10
4秒前
5秒前
7秒前
喵喵喵完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
一二三发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
大力的灵雁应助DZ采纳,获得50
10秒前
隐形曼青应助lqr采纳,获得10
13秒前
星河发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
熹微发布了新的文献求助50
14秒前
大意的觅云完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
17秒前
英姑应助一二三采纳,获得10
18秒前
18秒前
zls发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
zybbb完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
21秒前
22秒前
22秒前
25秒前
26秒前
26秒前
DTS发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
wangzili87发布了新的文献求助20
27秒前
28秒前
28秒前
chenyu完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
南宫万仇应助潘则宇采纳,获得10
29秒前
31秒前
轻松雨寒完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
31秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
PowerCascade: A Synthetic Dataset for Cascading Failure Analysis in Power Systems 2000
Picture this! Including first nations fiction picture books in school library collections 1500
Instituting Science: The Cultural Production of Scientific Disciplines 666
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
The Organization of knowledge in modern America, 1860-1920 / 600
Unlocking Chemical Thinking: Reimagining Chemistry Teaching and Learning 555
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6360672
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8174755
关于积分的说明 17219039
捐赠科研通 5415740
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2866032
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1843284
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1691337